Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gee Wilbur, You sound like an obnoxious crabby old SOB that hates women. And
you accuse women of reacting with emotion. I posed the question because the group was asked to support a bill with out any link to the bill. If someone is asking for my support then *they* should privide all of the facts. I sure hope for women everywhere that you are gay. Cindy "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message anews.com... "Cindy" wrote in message . .. Support it??? I am unsure what the bill is about. Is it engine emmissions? Or is it waste (holding Tank) dumping? Why would I support a bill that allows boaters (recreational or otherwise) to dump their turds into the waterways that our children swin in and we fish for our dinner in?? With the number of recreational boaters on our waterways... disgusting. Perhaps one should post the bill, in it's entirity, before asking for support. Cindy Stop being just another an ignorant twit, Cindy. Certainly YOU are capable of finding and reading the legislation of concern on-line. But, since you women are consistently inept when it comes to this sort of thing and you tend to react with emotions rather than logic mostly because logic is a foreign concept to most women, I shall render a concise summary for your benefit. The legislation (that all recreational boaters should support) excludes recreational boaters from draconian discharge legislation already in place whereby some law makers wish to include all recreational boats but has as its original intent to regulate discharge from shipping where there is a valid reason for such legislation. Due to the language of the requirements for shipping, recreational boaters would not be allowed to discharge ANYTHING into the surrounding waters. In other words you could not discharge water you used to wash your deck, or dishes, or your body. You could not throw food scraps into the water to feed the fishes. NOTHING could be allowed to come from your boat - even clean bilge water and be allowed to go into the surrounding water. You would have to have a holding tank for everything. The sewage issue is already covered and enforced by other existing state and federal legislation. This potential new legislation is another layer on top of that. And for this stupidity you would be required to buy and display a sticker that would cost you around 100 to 150 dollars a year. If you did not buy and display the sticker you could be subject to large fines or have your boat confiscated.Just another tax! Just more Big Brother tactics. And another law that could not be enforced and would not be enforced due to lack of manpower but a good way to raise revenue to fatten the paychecks of the bureaucrats. Does this help your fluff-headed understanding of the situation? If not consider you might have a small recreational skiff of say 18 feet in length. You enjoy going out fishing or just cruising around seeing the sights or sunbathing and having a beer or two and some barbeque. You anchor and go swimming. But you won't be allowed to stand on the transom and wash your hair or your body because some soap or shampoo would end up in the water. You would not be able to toss any food scraps to the fish or seagulls. You would not be able to pump your bilge or empty the water from your live well tanks. You would not be able to wash the suntan oil off the deck even with biodegradable soap. You would not be able to discharge anything from your skill. And for this idiocy you would be paying big bucks for a sticker that is nothing more than a tax. Now, run along and do your nails or something . . . Wilbur Hubbard |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So this is 2008... | General | |||
Hillary In 2008 | ASA | |||
2008 | General |