then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?

I probably spend more time as
radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year.

indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with
radar, as witness your statement below:

nor
uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running,

Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick
up added sea return in a specific area

ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your
intelligence or reading comprehension.

JAXAshby wrote:
then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?

LOL


I probably spend more time as
radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year.


indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with
radar, as witness your statement below:


nor

uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running,

Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick
up added sea return in a specific area



ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence.
...... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having
flat water.

ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed,
inexperienced, to be out in public.
Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post.

otn

no you don't see, no matter what you may feel you think.



ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your
intelligence or reading comprehension.

JAXAshby wrote:
then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?

LOL


I probably spend more time as
radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year.


indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks
with
radar, as witness your statement below:


nor

uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running,

Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick
up added sea return in a specific area



ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence.
..... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having
flat water.

ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed,
inexperienced, to be out in public.
Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post.

otn

no you don't see, no matter what you may feel you think.



ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your
intelligence or reading comprehension.

JAXAshby wrote:
then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?

LOL


I probably spend more time as
radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year.


indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks
with
radar, as witness your statement below:


nor

uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running,

Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick
up added sea return in a specific area



ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence.
..... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having
flat water.

ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed,
inexperienced, to be out in public.
Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post.

otn

those who can't, teach,, and those who can't and can't teach, are Jaxz!

those who can't, teach,, and those who can't and can't teach, are Jaxz!

ROFLMAO I see your self enforced absence did nothing to improve your
intelligence or reading comprehension.

JAXAshby wrote:
then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?

LOL


I probably spend more time as
radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year.


indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with
radar, as witness your statement below:


nor

uncharted rocks low in the water with any seas running,

Without seas running, may. With seas running, still may .... might pick
up added sea return in a specific area



ROFL You're so stupid, you can't even understand a simple sentence.
...... much less the ability of a radar to see "low rocks" without having
flat water.

ROFL Go back into hiding Jaxshole ... you're too stupid, uninformed,
inexperienced, to be out in public.
Nuff said, won't waste anyone's time further on your idiot post.

otn

On 28 Jan 2004 02:05:18 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?

I probably spend more time as
radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year.

indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks with
radar, as witness your statement below:

That may have been true in the 40's and 50's. It's not true anymore.
There are all sorts of techniques modern radars use to find things like
low rocks in sea clutter, from simple ones like scan averaging and
doppler filtering to complex adaptive filters which model the sea
clutter and remove it.

Steve

steve, no one talking here about the radar on military ships. we are talking
about the radar on recreational sailboats. go back to sleep.

then how come you are such a dumb squat when it comes to radar?

I probably spend more time as
radar observer, on my week off, than you do in a year.

indeed, you didn't even know you need nearly flat water to see low rocks
with
radar, as witness your statement below:

That may have been true in the 40's and 50's. It's not true anymore.
There are all sorts of techniques modern radars use to find things like
low rocks in sea clutter, from simple ones like scan averaging and
doppler filtering to complex adaptive filters which model the sea
clutter and remove it.

Steve

On 28 Jan 2004 13:30:25 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

steve, no one talking here about the radar on military ships. we are talking
about the radar on recreational sailboats. go back to sleep.

I'm not talking about military ships either. Scan averaging and/or
doppler filtering is commercially available in many units. The military
uses much more complex methods. Wake up!

Steve