shun, you are babbling. Go back and reread the posts. Like Ragu, it's in
there.

Subject: Useful gadgets
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 01/28/2004 11:13 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

hey shun, he only *thinks* he is talking about water with seas, but he is
not.
He is, in fact, talking about flat water. That he is ignorant of that fact
in
no way changes that fact.

go back to sleep, shun.


LOL Which is it, you don't know enough about or have used radar enough to
understand how one might see a reef line or a low lying (or even awash) rock,
on radar with a sea running? Or are you assuming that since it's beyond
you're
limited knowledge, it's impossible and can't be happening?

Shen

On 28 Jan 2004 13:30:25 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

steve, no one talking here about the radar on military ships. we are talking
about the radar on recreational sailboats. go back to sleep.

I'm not talking about military ships either. Scan averaging and/or
doppler filtering is commercially available in many units. The military
uses much more complex methods. Wake up!

Steve

On 28 Jan 2004 13:30:25 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

steve, no one talking here about the radar on military ships. we are talking
about the radar on recreational sailboats. go back to sleep.

I'm not talking about military ships either. Scan averaging and/or
doppler filtering is commercially available in many units. The military
uses much more complex methods. Wake up!

Steve

schleck, we are talking about radar for recreational sailboats NOT that which
is "commercially available" (your term" for cargo ships.

go back to sleep.

I'm not talking about military ships either. Scan averaging and/or
doppler filtering is commercially available in many units. The military
uses much more complex methods. Wake up!

Steve

schleck, we are talking about radar for recreational sailboats NOT that which
is "commercially available" (your term" for cargo ships.

go back to sleep.

I'm not talking about military ships either. Scan averaging and/or
doppler filtering is commercially available in many units. The military
uses much more complex methods. Wake up!

Steve

ject: Useful gadgets
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 01/28/2004 14:59 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

shun, you are babbling. Go back and reread the posts. Like Ragu, it's in
there.

That pretty well sums it up. You don't know what he said, don't understand what
he said, and obviously know nothing about radar observing.
BTW, he was not talking about flat calm seas and was talking about radar you
would have on a recreational boat, as was Steve.
The only one babbling here is you, but, that's all you've ever done or will do,
in these groups.

Shen

Subject: Useful gadgets
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 01/28/2004 11:13 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

hey shun, he only *thinks* he is talking about water with seas, but he is
not.
He is, in fact, talking about flat water. That he is ignorant of that fact
in
no way changes that fact.

go back to sleep, shun.


LOL Which is it, you don't know enough about or have used radar enough to
understand how one might see a reef line or a low lying (or even awash)
rock,
on radar with a sea running? Or are you assuming that since it's beyond
you're
limited knowledge, it's impossible and can't be happening?

Shen

ject: Useful gadgets
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 01/28/2004 14:59 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

shun, you are babbling. Go back and reread the posts. Like Ragu, it's in
there.

That pretty well sums it up. You don't know what he said, don't understand what
he said, and obviously know nothing about radar observing.
BTW, he was not talking about flat calm seas and was talking about radar you
would have on a recreational boat, as was Steve.
The only one babbling here is you, but, that's all you've ever done or will do,
in these groups.

Shen

Subject: Useful gadgets
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 01/28/2004 11:13 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

hey shun, he only *thinks* he is talking about water with seas, but he is
not.
He is, in fact, talking about flat water. That he is ignorant of that fact
in
no way changes that fact.

go back to sleep, shun.


LOL Which is it, you don't know enough about or have used radar enough to
understand how one might see a reef line or a low lying (or even awash)
rock,
on radar with a sea running? Or are you assuming that since it's beyond
you're
limited knowledge, it's impossible and can't be happening?

Shen

it amazes me Jax can type so well using only one hand!

it amazes me Jax can type so well using only one hand!

Dave wrote:
"Armond Perretta" said:
Dave wrote ...
Armond wrote ...
Dave wrote:
"Armond Perretta" said
Dave wrote:
Armond wrote:

Any person who regularly operates ... without radar in ...
decreased visibility (and I include ... darkness in this
category) is ... taking the position that "its up to the
other guy to avoid me."

As to darkness, nonsense. That's why vessels have running
lights.

When was the last time you saw a rock with running lights ... ?

When was the last time you saw a submerged [sic] rock on radar?

Who said anything about "submerged"?

I did. To make a point. Rather effective, no?

It is left as an exercise for the reader to determine the
effectives of this form of logic ...

[All but Kerry can safely ignore the following, as I'm sure you
understood it the first time around.] For Kerry here's the Dick and
Jane version.

Monosyllabic words do not strengthen a fallacious argument, "Dave," but your
ad hominem attack style is quite good. At least a B+ (an A- had you
correctly identified the individual under attack).

BTW, how did you get "x no archive" disguised in the header? Clever.

--
Good luck and good sailing.
s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat
http://kerrydeare.home.comcast.net/