Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:15:26 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: But, if it doesn't have mast steps installed you'll have to do that first because replacing standing rigging one wire at a time involves many trips up the mast. Yeahbut... If you are going to replace them all anyway, why not drop the mast. Now we can get to the mast electrical wiring too. And inspect and replace any fittings that look iffy... And all the nuts, bolts, screws, etc. Seems a quicker and easier way to go. IF there is a crane handy... |
#12
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
|
#13
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
news:ZWNvi.17489$SV4.5430@trnddc08... So I'm reading the survey for one of the boats that I'm looking at. It's a Catalina 36 = 1984 model Moored in fresh water now, but has been in salt water. Under Surveyer's Recommendations are a list of items that needed attention. It's not a long list but there is one item (C rated) that I'm kinda concerned about. It says "All items aloft (spars, rigging, fittings, hardware, etc) should be visually inspected for condition by a qualified/experienced yacht rigger or equivelent". Is this normal for a professional survey? It's fairly normal. Most surveyors don't truly inspect the rigging at the top or at the spreaders. If the rigging is over 10 yrs old or is showing signs, then it's time to replace it. You could hire someone to climb and inspect, but a lot can be seen with binoculars. It shouldn't be *that* expensive, but neither is it cheap. My rigging was fine, but had the forestay replaced since I was adding a furler anyway. I also had the lifelines replaced at the same time. They were ready. And, like everything else on the list it it maked off, "done". But I don't yet know who the equivelent was. So I'm a little curious here. Do I need to hire a professional rigger to check the rigging in a situation like this? I mean, replacing all the standing rigging on any boat is not a trivial matter. Now I don't necessarily have to have new rigging on the boat I buy, but if it needs to be replaced I need to know up front. And adjust the price as appropriate... Richard -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#14
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
news:xnQvi.2410$jy5.679@trnddc07... Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:15:26 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: But, if it doesn't have mast steps installed you'll have to do that first because replacing standing rigging one wire at a time involves many trips up the mast. Yeahbut... If you are going to replace them all anyway, why not drop the mast. Now we can get to the mast electrical wiring too. And inspect and replace any fittings that look iffy... And all the nuts, bolts, screws, etc. Seems a quicker and easier way to go. IF there is a crane handy... Sure.. it's only money. :-) Most things will be obvious to someone who regularly does rigging work, and you can probably find such a person to go aloft. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#15
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
Capt. JG wrote:
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message news:ZWNvi.17489$SV4.5430@trnddc08... So I'm reading the survey for one of the boats that I'm looking at. It's a Catalina 36 = 1984 model Moored in fresh water now, but has been in salt water. Under Surveyer's Recommendations are a list of items that needed attention. It's not a long list but there is one item (C rated) that I'm kinda concerned about. It says "All items aloft (spars, rigging, fittings, hardware, etc) should be visually inspected for condition by a qualified/experienced yacht rigger or equivelent". Is this normal for a professional survey? It's fairly normal. Most surveyors don't truly inspect the rigging at the top or at the spreaders. If the rigging is over 10 yrs old or is showing signs, then it's time to replace it. You could hire someone to climb and inspect, but a lot can be seen with binoculars. It shouldn't be *that* expensive, but neither is it cheap. My rigging was fine, but had the forestay replaced since I was adding a furler anyway. I also had the lifelines replaced at the same time. They were ready. Thanks, Cap'n |
#16
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:42:13 GMT, cavelamb himself
wrote: wrote: The statement is simply an "out" for the surveyor. It means that he didn't inspect the rigging. Having said that, have a good friend who is a Lloyd's Inspector and does frequent inspection of VLCC, etc., usually to determine what repairs will be required to have the vessel pass class inspection, whether for sale or modification, repair, etc.. He inspects the hull, tanks, piping and valves, tank venting, steering gear, in short the mechanical portion of the ship. He does not inspect the electronics or radios. So, it is not unusual, in the commercial world, for a surveyor to inspect only certain portions of a vessel. However -- when you contract with Lloyd's for a survey you will sign a contract that specify in excruciating detail exactly what they will inspect for. To answer you question though, yes, if the boat is close to ten years old I would have the rigging inspected. Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) 27 years old. (and we so dreaded 1984 coming! Has it been that long already?) I think it just needs to be replaced. Say, is thee a Lloyd's of Texas??? No the Lloyd's I was referring to was Lloyd's of London,, in this case a ship classification and certifying company. It seems like the general advise is to change stainless rigging every ten years but I'm inclined to believe that is more of a local legend then anything else. I have personally seen USAF aircraft with current inspections that had brass safety wire on the turnbuckles, a practice that had been abandoned by the Air Force more then twenty years ago., so it is possible that the wire itself is not the problem. If I were worried about the rigging then I'd either hire a reputable guy to inspect it or at the very least get some good cleaner and the strongest magnifying glass you can find and clean the lower terminals and examine them. Usually the lower terminals tend to fail before uppers as they are usually pretty well soaked with seawater most of the time. If you see any crack in the lower terminals, no matter how small, it is time to replace the rigging. My personal advise would be to pull the mast and lay it down as there is more to rigging then just cables. I've seen mast head fittings cracked, through bolts holding the lower stay plates ready to break, a welded on spinnaker boom lift bracket cracked and ready to fall off. Also, while the mast is down you can check the internal wiring and make sure that is in good shape and that the conduit is still riveted in . Re mast steps recommended by another poster. If you can afford the kind that fold into the mast then by all means install them but if you are contemplating the big triangular stirrups that are riveted to the outside of the mast then consider -- you will need to rig some sort of lacing to prevent lines from getting wrapped around the steps -- they are easy to run up and down but a real pain in the neck. I know, I've got 'em on my boat. Bruce in Bangkok (brucepaigeATgmailDOTcom) |
#17
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
Why don't you just call your surveyor and ask him?
You must realize of course, that if this is a survey the seller gave you its worth about as much as him saying "My brother-in-law thinks its a real good boat." There are two types of surveys, a proper survey where the buyer wants to find every little thing that has gone bad, will go bad, and might go bad in the boat; and an insurance survey which says that the boat probably won't sink or blow up in the next 2 years, and isn't concerned with the all the minor things that are falling off (i.e. not covered by insurance). The insurance surveyor is often found by the seller's broker when the buyer realizes he'll need the survey for insurance. He is a "house surveyor" and wouldn't remain one long if he convinced buyers not to buy. On top of that, in most places you don't need a license or certification to call yourself a surveyor. Before you seriously look at boats you should find a surveyor that you're comfortable with, and have a discussion about the type of boat you're looking for, and what he recommends as conditions for the survey. For instance, if the boat is on the hard, can he do a proper engine survey? Might he require invasive tests that need the seller's permission? * cavelamb himself wrote, On 8/12/2007 8:52 PM: So I'm reading the survey for one of the boats that I'm looking at. It's a Catalina 36 = 1984 model Moored in fresh water now, but has been in salt water. Under Surveyer's Recommendations are a list of items that needed attention. It's not a long list but there is one item (C rated) that I'm kinda concerned about. It says "All items aloft (spars, rigging, fittings, hardware, etc) should be visually inspected for condition by a qualified/experienced yacht rigger or equivelent". Is this normal for a professional survey? And, like everything else on the list it it maked off, "done". But I don't yet know who the equivelent was. So I'm a little curious here. Do I need to hire a professional rigger to check the rigging in a situation like this? I mean, replacing all the standing rigging on any boat is not a trivial matter. Now I don't necessarily have to have new rigging on the boat I buy, but if it needs to be replaced I need to know up front. And adjust the price as appropriate... Richard -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#18
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
cavelamb himself wrote:
So I'm reading the survey for one of the boats that I'm looking at. It's a Catalina 36 = 1984 model Moored in fresh water now, but has been in salt water. Under Surveyer's Recommendations are a list of items that needed attention. It's not a long list but there is one item (C rated) that I'm kinda concerned about. It says "All items aloft (spars, rigging, fittings, hardware, etc) should be visually inspected for condition by a qualified/experienced yacht rigger or equivelent". Is this normal for a professional survey? Yes but it is more of a disclaimer than anything. When we had our boat surveyed before purchase, we got Peter Hartoff who several people recommended as the best around here. He did everything except the rigging. He did an in water survey first and then had us haul the boat, and did the hull, and then he took the boat out for a sea trial. We had told him what use we intended to make of the boat, so his survey was based on that. When the marina wanted proof of insurance several years later, and the insurance company wanted a survey first, we got another guy, and he used the previous survey to check that we'd done the A list things and the B list things and basically looked to see that nothing else had gone terribly long in the interval. He did the survey with the boat in the water - we didn't haul it for him. And, like everything else on the list it it maked off, "done". But I don't yet know who the equivelent was. Who marked it 'done'. The only way to find out is to ask. Although they may not tell you. So I'm a little curious here. Do I need to hire a professional rigger to check the rigging in a situation like this? I mean, replacing all the standing rigging on any boat is not a trivial matter. Now I don't necessarily have to have new rigging on the boat I buy, but if it needs to be replaced I need to know up front. And adjust the price as appropriate... I'm getting from your question that you didn't order this survey - that it was a previous survey done by the current or previous owner (??) IMHO for most major purchases you should not rely on a previous survey, because you don't know what purpose the survey was done for - was it for insurance like our second survey, or was it for a previous sale that fell through, or what. If this IS your own survey, then you need to ask the surveyor what was 'done'. |
#19
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
"cavelamb himself" wrote in message news:xnQvi.2410$jy5.679@trnddc07... Wayne.B wrote: On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:15:26 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: But, if it doesn't have mast steps installed you'll have to do that first because replacing standing rigging one wire at a time involves many trips up the mast. Yeahbut... If you are going to replace them all anyway, why not drop the mast. Now we can get to the mast electrical wiring too. And inspect and replace any fittings that look iffy... And all the nuts, bolts, screws, etc. Seems a quicker and easier way to go. IF there is a crane handy... Cranes are expensive. And how long are you going to have to sit in the yard paying out the wazoo daily while you're working on the rigging. You can do your own rigging while anchored or moored and it costs nothing but your time and labor. Not only that but it's safer. At any rate, mast steps are necessary. But, if you desire to re-do the internal wiring, and possibly sheaves and running rigging and standing rigging all at the same time, lowering the mast might be the way to go. Any cruising boat should have mast steps. Unlike what Wayne B said about them, the right kind of steps don't foul halyards and don't rip sails. Get the folding steps. They are the best. You can install them yourself with simple tools one at a times using the one you just installed to stand on to install the next one. When cruising you need a way to get to the masthead for inspections and repairs and you need to go to the masthead frequently. It's foolish to have no way to inspect, repair, install systems at the masthead. http://www.go2marine.com/product.do?no=81324F Wilbur Hubbard |
#20
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Survey question
wrote in message ... Re mast steps recommended by another poster. If you can afford the kind that fold into the mast then by all means install them but if you are contemplating the big triangular stirrups that are riveted to the outside of the mast then consider -- you will need to rig some sort of lacing to prevent lines from getting wrapped around the steps -- they are easy to run up and down but a real pain in the neck. I know, I've got 'em on my boat. http://www.go2marine.com/product.do?no=81324F These are what REAL cruising sailors use these days. They are what Capt. Neal has on his fine blue water cruiser so they must be the best. . . Wilbur Hubbard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New survey | ASA | |||
Please help with a UseNet survey | General | |||
Do-it-yourself survey. How? Look for what? | Boat Building | |||
Ownership Question/Survey | General | |||
Just a little question/survey about living aboard | ASA |