Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gotta give you cedit for tenacity if not accuracy.
You wrote: "There are no coastal (or inland) waters in the whole US--east coast, west coast, or Gulf--in which it's legal to discharge raw untreated toilet waste directly overboard or dump a tank." You're referring to the Alexander Archipelego...right? "More than 3 miles from the nearest land" is the key. Any time you're in ocean waters, Federal law prohibits the discharge of raw untreated waste WITHIN 3 miles of the nearest land. State boundary line has nothing to with it... Do you know what a "boundary line" is? The waters in the donut holes are landward of the barrier islands forming the west side of that part of the inside passage. They are not in "ocean waters," except for the purposes of COLREGS. They are in the sheltered coastal waters of Southeast Alaska. The new law didn't grant any exemptions to smaller vessels, only put an additional burden on the large ones. The new law exempted small vessels carrying less than 50 overnight passengers. It did not give them any more rights than they had to begin with. The new law only removed the "right" of larger vessels to legally dump raw sewage in certain areas of the inland and coastal waters of Alaska. You would be in Puget sound, and if you sailed closer than 3 miles to any land between Port Townsend and the Canadian border...from there to the AK state line you're in Canadian coastal waters, subject to their laws, not ours. No dumping is allowed in Puget Sound or the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The point I was trying to make is that a small boat can indeed travel from just north of Seattle all the way to Glacier Bay via the inside passage and legally dump raw sewage. That is directly and correctly in opposition to your statement that "There are no coastal (or inland) waters in the whole US--east coast, west coast, or Gulf--in which it's legal to discharge raw untreated toilet waste directly overboard or dump a tank." If starting at the southern Canadian border bugs you then start at the other Canadian border just north of Prince Rupert and go north from there in US coastal waters and dump raw sewage in the donut holes. It's VERY confusing, I know.... No, it's not confusing. It is part of the information a competent and informed person requires to safely and legally operate a vessel in US waters. What confuses people is when false or misleading statements are posted on the internet by people who do not know what they are talking about. Call it nitpicking if you like but, just like your inspected vessel statement, the devil is in the details when it comes to the regulatory side of boating. Rick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heh...Bubba's Book Sales Stalled | General | |||
Interesting book | General | |||
Homer Hickam's latest book | General | |||
Smelly raw-water spigot (Peggy, help!) | General | |||
Helpful new boating book | General |