Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:31 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: Diesel fuel burns at temperatures high enough to soften steel and cause buildings to fall into their own footprints? From now on, I weld with diesel. You can believe what you want, and weld with it also, but diesel will definitely burn hot enough to weaken steel. There have been numerous incidents where tanker trucks have caught fire following an accident and caused the structural collapse of a highway overpass. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:31 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: Diesel fuel burns at temperatures high enough to soften steel and cause buildings to fall into their own footprints? From now on, I weld with diesel. You can believe what you want, and weld with it also, but diesel will definitely burn hot enough to weaken steel. There have been numerous incidents where tanker trucks have caught fire following an accident and caused the structural collapse of a highway overpass. Hiway overpasses built of steel reinforced concrete, that is. Not exactly the same thing is it? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:57:07 -0500, KLC Lewis wrote:
Hiway overpasses built of steel reinforced concrete, that is. Not exactly the same thing is it? You might want to look at the following pictures. It doesn't look like the steel held up very well. http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/art.../a/2007/04/29/ BAGVOPHQU46.DTL |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:57:07 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: ... diesel will definitely burn hot enough to weaken steel. There have been numerous incidents where tanker trucks have caught fire following an accident and caused the structural collapse of a highway overpass. Hiway overpasses built of steel reinforced concrete, that is. Not exactly the same thing is it? Quite so: concrete clad steel has a much better fire-rating than bare steel. Stout timber columns have better resistance than bare steel, for that matter. But the achilles heel of concrete reinforced with steel is at the fixings. Bare steel..... Brian Whatcott Altus OK |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:57:07 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:31 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: Diesel fuel burns at temperatures high enough to soften steel and cause buildings to fall into their own footprints? From now on, I weld with diesel. You can believe what you want, and weld with it also, but diesel will definitely burn hot enough to weaken steel. There have been numerous incidents where tanker trucks have caught fire following an accident and caused the structural collapse of a highway overpass. Hiway overpasses built of steel reinforced concrete, that is. Not exactly the same thing is it? Steel is steel, heat it hot enough, it weakens. The evidence is there for all to see. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:57:07 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:31 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: Diesel fuel burns at temperatures high enough to soften steel and cause buildings to fall into their own footprints? From now on, I weld with diesel. You can believe what you want, and weld with it also, but diesel will definitely burn hot enough to weaken steel. There have been numerous incidents where tanker trucks have caught fire following an accident and caused the structural collapse of a highway overpass. Hiway overpasses built of steel reinforced concrete, that is. Not exactly the same thing is it? Steel is steel, heat it hot enough, it weakens. The evidence is there for all to see. Exactly so. Thermite would do it -- diesel would not. The evidence is there for all to see. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 May 2007 22:18:32 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: Thermite would do it -- diesel would not. Nonsense. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 May 2007 22:18:32 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 28 May 2007 17:57:07 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:36:31 -0500, "KLC Lewis" wrote: Diesel fuel burns at temperatures high enough to soften steel and cause buildings to fall into their own footprints? From now on, I weld with diesel. You can believe what you want, and weld with it also, but diesel will definitely burn hot enough to weaken steel. There have been numerous incidents where tanker trucks have caught fire following an accident and caused the structural collapse of a highway overpass. Hiway overpasses built of steel reinforced concrete, that is. Not exactly the same thing is it? Steel is steel, heat it hot enough, it weakens. The evidence is there for all to see. Exactly so. Thermite would do it -- diesel would not. The evidence is there for all to see. No - thermite wouldn't do it. Thermite's advantage is that the heat has to be contained to reach temperature - like in welding rails or specialized shapes. It thermite is exposed, the heat disappates and the reaction disappears. I would think a welder would know that. Next thing, "Truthers" will be claiming that WTC 7 and the the Towers were brought down by tachyon beams routed through the deflector dish of an Klingon War Bird who were hired by the Bush Administration so he could have a pretext to go to war with Iraq. Morons. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Next thing, "Truthers" will be claiming that WTC 7 and the the Towers were brought down by tachyon beams routed through the deflector dish of an Klingon War Bird who were hired by the Bush Administration so he could have a pretext to go to war with Iraq. Morons. There seem to be two unstated propositions floating about he 1.) The laws of physics REQUIRE that the official explanation be accepted; and 2.) The laws of physics PROHIBIT any alternative explanation. So far, nothing posted is within lightyears of proving either, much less both, of the propositions. In fact, they are probably not provable. So we are reduced to counting numbers of proponents for each view with weights calculated for academic degrees and numbers of papers published? Doesn't have the ring of "science" somehow. Name-calling, ridicule, etc. seem pathetic recourse. Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... No - thermite wouldn't do it. Thermite's advantage is that the heat has to be contained to reach temperature - like in welding rails or specialized shapes. It thermite is exposed, the heat disappates and the reaction disappears. I would think a welder would know that. Next thing, "Truthers" will be claiming that WTC 7 and the the Towers were brought down by tachyon beams routed through the deflector dish of an Klingon War Bird who were hired by the Bush Administration so he could have a pretext to go to war with Iraq. Morons. Never heard of shape charges? As an aside, I find it interesting that you use as an epithet, a label for those who simply want to know the truth. Yes, I am a "Truther." Does that make you a "Liar"? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MarineMax service | General | |||
OT Glad for Vonage! | General |