Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John Reimer" wrote: "Sal's Dad" wrote in message ... You should read the full report http://www.maib.gov.uk/publications/.../2007/ouzo.cfm - it's very sobering, with good information on night vision and ship-to-yacht interactions. Thanks for the link, it's a very educational read, but also sad, would much rather have them be telling their cautionary story themselves.. A personally carried EPIRB, check, but didn't realize a crotch strap could be that important, and will never look at a radar reflector the same way again. And hydrostatically launched life raft, hmm, looks more appealing now. BUT, what I still don't get, is why couldn't the three gents onboard the Ouzo just avoid the Bilbao altogether? I mean the question is literal, what would cause them to NOT be able to avoid her, I'm not blaming the victim here. Assuming they were on watch and not below, in clear conditions (though night), would it have been that difficult to see the hugely larger Bilbao before getting so close? Even if all her running lights were off, there were thousands of passengers on her (or a lot) so there would have been at least the common area lighting on. Why couldn't the Ouzo see her? Of course, if they did see her, I guess I can understand if they had lost steerage, but that doesn't seem likely given the scenario outlined. Or does it? Those three gents had way, way more experience than me, so I'm trying to understand the missing piece: I know the factors that contributed to Bilbao's actions (or lack thereof before and after). Why did Ouzo allow her to get so close in the first place? As I recall, they were in Southampton water, which is a (relatively) small area with lots of shipping/cruisers etc. Makes it even more of a puzzle in that they didn't seem to have a lookout despite their experience. Molesworth SV Captive 39' NDMorgan |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You should read the full report
http://www.maib.gov.uk/publications/.../2007/ouzo.cfm - it's very sobering, with good information on night vision and ship-to-yacht interactions. BUT, what I still don't get, is why couldn't the three gents onboard the Ouzo just avoid the Bilbao altogether? I mean the question is literal, what would cause them to NOT be able to avoid her, I'm not blaming the victim here. Assuming they were on watch and not below, in clear conditions (though night), would it have been that difficult to see the hugely larger Bilbao before getting so close? Even if all her running lights were off, there were thousands of passengers on her (or a lot) so there would have been at least the common area lighting on. Why couldn't the Ouzo see her? Why did Ouzo allow her to get so close in the first place? As I recall, they were in Southampton water, which is a (relatively) small area with lots of shipping/cruisers etc. Makes it even more of a puzzle in that they didn't seem to have a lookout despite their experience. "The crew of Ouzo were thought to have been skilled and conscientious in their approach to navigation and watchkeeping, and, if they were conforming to their usual practices, they will have set watch routines with two crew members in the cockpit at all times...A million candela flashlight was kept ready...to warn ships of their presence...As regular sailors in those waters and with local knowledge, the crew might even have realised that it was the Pride of Bilbao, bound for Spain. "The quality of the lookout on Ouzo as Pride of Bilbao approached will never be known, however if the crew were alert to her approach it would have appeared that she was going to pass well clear. In fact, up until 0101, she was steering a course to pass them at a distance of about 0.5 nautical mile. "On reaching the waypoint position at 0101, Pride of Bilbao began a slow turn to starboard. We do not know if the Ouzo's crew noticed this but, if they had done so, with no other obvious reason for the course alteration, they might have thought the ferry was altering course to give way to them in compliance with Rule 19 of the COLREGS. This, in turn, might have led them to believe that the ferry's bridge team had seen them, thus possibly relieving them of some anxiety. "The alteration of course took more than 3 minutes to complete...such a slow manner can lead to doubt and indecision on board other vessels..." The officer "saw a cluster of bright white lights before moving to the steering controls and losing sight of the yacht. It is possible that these lights resulted from the use of the flashlight, which the yacht's crew kept at hand for such emergencies" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yacht charter Croatia | Cruising | |||
HELP! Stain on seats!! | General | |||
Aboard the Anderson Ferry | General | |||
Yacht Charter Vancouver - Five Star Yacht Charters | Cruising | |||
Update on Marina Damage -- FL Coasts | Cruising |