Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 181
Default Yacht sunk by Ferry

In article ,
"John Reimer" wrote:

"Sal's Dad" wrote in message
...
You should read the full report
http://www.maib.gov.uk/publications/.../2007/ouzo.cfm -
it's very sobering, with good information on night vision and
ship-to-yacht interactions.


Thanks for the link, it's a very educational read, but also sad, would much
rather have them be telling their cautionary story themselves..

A personally carried EPIRB, check, but didn't realize a crotch strap could
be that important, and will never look at a radar reflector the same way
again. And hydrostatically launched life raft, hmm, looks more appealing
now.

BUT, what I still don't get, is why couldn't the three gents onboard the
Ouzo just avoid the Bilbao altogether?

I mean the question is literal, what would cause them to NOT be able to
avoid her, I'm not blaming the victim here.

Assuming they were on watch and not below, in clear conditions (though
night), would it have been that difficult to see the hugely larger Bilbao
before getting so close? Even if all her running lights were off, there
were thousands of passengers on her (or a lot) so there would have been at
least the common area lighting on. Why couldn't the Ouzo see her?

Of course, if they did see her, I guess I can understand if they had lost
steerage, but that doesn't seem likely given the scenario outlined. Or does
it?

Those three gents had way, way more experience than me, so I'm trying to
understand the missing piece: I know the factors that contributed to
Bilbao's actions (or lack thereof before and after).

Why did Ouzo allow her to get so close in the first place?


As I recall, they were in Southampton water, which is a (relatively)
small area with lots of shipping/cruisers etc. Makes it even more of a
puzzle in that they didn't seem to have a lookout despite their
experience.

Molesworth

SV Captive
39' NDMorgan
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 44
Default Yacht sunk by Ferry

You should read the full report
http://www.maib.gov.uk/publications/.../2007/ouzo.cfm
-
it's very sobering, with good information on night vision and
ship-to-yacht interactions.


BUT, what I still don't get, is why couldn't the three gents onboard the
Ouzo just avoid the Bilbao altogether?

I mean the question is literal, what would cause them to NOT be able to
avoid her, I'm not blaming the victim here.

Assuming they were on watch and not below, in clear conditions (though
night), would it have been that difficult to see the hugely larger Bilbao
before getting so close? Even if all her running lights were off, there
were thousands of passengers on her (or a lot) so there would have been
at
least the common area lighting on. Why couldn't the Ouzo see her?

Why did Ouzo allow her to get so close in the first place?


As I recall, they were in Southampton water, which is a (relatively)
small area with lots of shipping/cruisers etc. Makes it even more of a
puzzle in that they didn't seem to have a lookout despite their
experience.


"The crew of Ouzo were thought to have been skilled and conscientious in
their approach to navigation and watchkeeping, and, if they were conforming
to their usual practices, they will have set watch routines with two crew
members in the cockpit at all times...A million candela flashlight was kept
ready...to warn ships of their presence...As regular sailors in those waters
and with local knowledge, the crew might even have realised that it was the
Pride of Bilbao, bound for Spain.

"The quality of the lookout on Ouzo as Pride of Bilbao approached will never
be known, however if the crew were alert to her approach it would have
appeared that she was going to pass well clear. In fact, up until 0101, she
was steering a course to pass them at a distance of about 0.5 nautical mile.

"On reaching the waypoint position at 0101, Pride of Bilbao began a slow
turn to starboard. We do not know if the Ouzo's crew noticed this but, if
they had done so, with no other obvious reason for the course alteration,
they might have thought the ferry was altering course to give way to them in
compliance with Rule 19 of the COLREGS. This, in turn, might have led them
to believe that the ferry's bridge team had seen them, thus possibly
relieving them of some anxiety.

"The alteration of course took more than 3 minutes to complete...such a slow
manner can lead to doubt and indecision on board other vessels..."

The officer "saw a cluster of bright white lights before moving to the
steering controls and losing sight of the yacht. It is possible that these
lights resulted from the use of the flashlight, which the yacht's crew kept
at hand for such emergencies"


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yacht charter Croatia [email protected] Cruising 1 February 23rd 14 02:32 PM
HELP! Stain on seats!! SARAH General 12 June 5th 06 07:13 PM
Aboard the Anderson Ferry Garrison Hilliard General 2 January 24th 06 12:40 AM
Yacht Charter Vancouver - Five Star Yacht Charters Todd Zuccolo Cruising 0 April 17th 05 11:58 AM
Update on Marina Damage -- FL Coasts anchorlt Cruising 0 September 24th 04 08:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017