Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a
sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Wilbur Hubbard Never heard of the 'throw away society'? |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it.
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Wilbur Hubbard Never heard of the 'throw away society'? |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it. One measures it by accepted practices that have a history of working. That's what Lloyds standards in boatbuilding are all about. Tried and true. Lloyds standards mean a quality boat. Building a boat to no accepted measure of standards gets you a very inexpensive boat but you are trading safety and seaworthiness for a cheap price. If you don't have any reasonable standards yourself this will be acceptable to you but if you have high standards it will to entirely unacceptable. It's really very simple. Oh, speaking of standards, it's standard practice to reply to a post at the bottom, not the top. See, one little clue and I know you have low standards. You probably sail a MacGregor 26... Wilbur Hubbard |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:47:54 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: wrote in message ... First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it. One measures it by accepted practices that have a history of working. That's what Lloyds standards in boatbuilding are all about. Tried and true. Lloyds standards mean a quality boat. Building a boat to no accepted measure of standards gets you a very inexpensive boat but you are trading safety and seaworthiness for a cheap price. If you don't have any reasonable standards yourself this will be acceptable to you but if you have high standards it will to entirely unacceptable. It's really very simple. Oh, speaking of standards, it's standard practice to reply to a post at the bottom, not the top. See, one little clue and I know you have low standards. You probably sail a MacGregor 26... I believe the Wauquiez I mentioned earlier, which had a serious build defect, touts the Lloyds Standards imprimatur in one fashion or another. While not disagreeing about standards being essential in just about any endeavor, there are standards and there are standards. For Powersailors (very cool term) the Mac sets the standard. Would you think less of the Coronado if it didn't have a Lloyds Standard stamp of approval? Here's a link giving a cursory look at Lloyds Standards and others. http://www.boats.com/news-reviews/ar....html?lid=2773 Very costly initially and must be renewed yearly. Other browsing indicates the term Lloyds Standards is used - or misused - dishonestly, as a true Lloyds Standard boat must meet many requirements. Using the term Lloyds Standards is often just sizzle. In your heart you know that. One of my concerns with the Mac is the standards used in its materials and construction. Since it will mostly be used parked near your Coronado, it must have a solid enough deck to install thru-deck A/C and room in the cockpit or transom for the genset. But it won't go to blue water so the Lloyds Standards are not an issue. Gunkholing, slow cruising and leisurely sailing are the Macs suite of capabilities in my eyes, and owners seem pretty happy doing those things with them., Lloyds or no Lloyds. --Vic |
#6
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:47:54 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: wrote in message ... First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it. One measures it by accepted practices that have a history of working. That's what Lloyds standards in boatbuilding are all about. Tried and true. Lloyds standards mean a quality boat. Building a boat to no accepted measure of standards gets you a very inexpensive boat but you are trading safety and seaworthiness for a cheap price. If you don't have any reasonable standards yourself this will be acceptable to you but if you have high standards it will to entirely unacceptable. It's really very simple. Oh, speaking of standards, it's standard practice to reply to a post at the bottom, not the top. See, one little clue and I know you have low standards. You probably sail a MacGregor 26... I believe the Wauquiez I mentioned earlier, which had a serious build defect, touts the Lloyds Standards imprimatur in one fashion or another. While not disagreeing about standards being essential in just about any endeavor, there are standards and there are standards. For Powersailors (very cool term) the Mac sets the standard. Would you think less of the Coronado if it didn't have a Lloyds Standard stamp of approval? Here's a link giving a cursory look at Lloyds Standards and others. http://www.boats.com/news-reviews/ar....html?lid=2773 Very costly initially and must be renewed yearly. Other browsing indicates the term Lloyds Standards is used - or misused - dishonestly, as a true Lloyds Standard boat must meet many requirements. Using the term Lloyds Standards is often just sizzle. In your heart you know that. One of my concerns with the Mac is the standards used in its materials and construction. Since it will mostly be used parked near your Coronado, it must have a solid enough deck to install thru-deck A/C and room in the cockpit or transom for the genset. But it won't go to blue water so the Lloyds Standards are not an issue. Gunkholing, slow cruising and leisurely sailing are the Macs suite of capabilities in my eyes, and owners seem pretty happy doing those things with them., Lloyds or no Lloyds. --Vic Thanks. That's a good link. It proves my point. It says: "For that same reason, American builders have been slow to encourage the use of classifications because buyers aren't familiar with them and, almost to a man, they all claim to build better boats than required by the societies. Whether that is true or not is just as debatable as whether a buyer would want a boat built to society standards. One well-known builder noted that it is impossible to build the high-speed motoryachts, now so popular, to classification because of the sacrifices necessary to keep the weight to a minimum. The societies, on the other hand, point out that they have been classing high-speed patrol craft and other speed-oriented vessels for many years, and suggest that the builder is probably cutting many corners in search of an extra knot or two." Cutting many corners in search for an extra knot or two? Sound familiar? Sounds like it describes a MacGregor 26. Wilbur Hubbard |
#7
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it. One measures it by accepted practices that have a history of working. That's what Lloyds standards in boatbuilding are all about. Tried and true. Lloyds standards mean a quality boat. Building a boat to no accepted measure of standards gets you a very inexpensive boat but you are trading safety and seaworthiness for a cheap price. If you don't have any reasonable standards yourself this will be acceptable to you but if you have high standards it will to entirely unacceptable. It's really very simple. Oh, speaking of standards, it's standard practice to reply to a post at the bottom, not the top. See, one little clue and I know you have low standards. You probably sail a MacGregor 26... Wilbur Hubbard Your definition of Quality is not explicit and you do not have any means of measuring it. Your understanding is vague and speculative. Therefore I can only conclude that you do not know what is quality. Nor will you be able to understand the meaning of building standards let alone the Mil Specs, history dockets and inspection and test plan. If you were to build a sailboat how much budget will you allocate for standards, quality programs and control. |
#8
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... First one has to define exactly what is quality. How do we measure it. One measures it by accepted practices that have a history of working. That's what Lloyds standards in boatbuilding are all about. Tried and true. Lloyds standards mean a quality boat. Building a boat to no accepted measure of standards gets you a very inexpensive boat but you are trading safety and seaworthiness for a cheap price. If you don't have any reasonable standards yourself this will be acceptable to you but if you have high standards it will to entirely unacceptable. It's really very simple. Oh, speaking of standards, it's standard practice to reply to a post at the bottom, not the top. See, one little clue and I know you have low standards. You probably sail a MacGregor 26... Wilbur Hubbard Your definition of Quality is not explicit and you do not have any means of measuring it. Your understanding is vague and speculative. Therefore I can only conclude that you do not know what is quality. Nor will you be able to understand the meaning of building standards let alone the Mil Specs, history dockets and inspection and test plan. If you were to build a sailboat how much budget will you allocate for standards, quality programs and control. I fail to see your logic. I don't have to know the ins and outs of quality myself as I don't build boats myself. All I have to know is there exists certain boat building quality standards among which are Lloyds and ABS. These organizations certify boat building according to their established tried-and-true building methods and inspect for compliance as the boat is being built. We're talking yachts here not military ships so military specs. and irrelevant. As for budget requirements to build a boat to Lloyds specifications I believe the article posted above mentioned it might be up to 10% more for the inspection process alone. Of course, quality materials and proper scantlings necessarily add more to the cost than some cheap, fly-by-night outfit like MacGregor who just builds to the "sell a boat cheaper than anybody else can" standards. Wilbur Hubbard |
#9
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Wilbur Hubbard Never heard of the 'throw away society'? Exactly fits the bill. Ask yourself why throw it away? Because it's a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap suited only for short-term use. Has MacGregor written all over it, doesn't it? It's like walking around with a sign plastered on your back which says, "I'm a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap posing as a human being." No pride in your things means no pride in yourself. Sad! Wilbur Hubbard |
#10
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in message ... There are high standards and there are low standards. For, example a sailboat built to ABYS standards is poorly built compared to a sailboat built to Lloyds standards. And a boat that's not built to any existing accepted standard is a very questionable proposition. Yet, today's yacht purchaser seems be unconcerned with boat building standards. They are more concerned with how many it sleeps or if the head is enclosed. You should ask yourself why. Why? I'll be more than happy to tell you why. Because people these days themselves have few or no standards. About 30% of the people in this country call themselves Democrats, i.e., no standards. About 10% of the people in this country are illiterate, i.e., no standards. But since most of that 10% are Democrats I suppose it's six of one and half-dozen of the other. About 90% of the people in this country watch excessive hours of television daily, i.e., no standards. Less than half the people in this country regularly attend church, i.e., no moral standards. These are but a few examples of a standard-less society. Now, what's this got to do with sailboats? Lots, believe me, lots! Take the MacGregor 26X and 26M. Neither boat is built to any accepted standard of quality at all. Yet, a standardless boat is the leading seller in that size range. Is that not convincing proof that people these days have no personal standards? Can you imagine anybody concerned with safety and proper boat construction actually paying good money for a boat that's built to no accepted boat building standards? It's incredible to think such a sad state of affairs has eventuated. Wilbur Hubbard Never heard of the 'throw away society'? Exactly fits the bill. Ask yourself why throw it away? Because it's a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap suited only for short-term use. Has MacGregor written all over it, doesn't it? It's like walking around with a sign plastered on your back which says, "I'm a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap posing as a human being." No pride in your things means no pride in yourself. Sad! Wilbur Hubbard Wilber, I've seen your boat You are a cheap, shoddy, **** poor pile of crap posing as a human being. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
American Boating & Yacht Council Standards, new or older for 1/16 the price ? | Boat Building | |||
Bill Moyers on environment, politics and Christian fundamentalists | General | |||
STANDARDS | ASA |