![]() |
New Jersey operator licensing
|
New Jersey operator licensing
On 6 Apr 2006 21:12:03 -0500, Dave wrote:
Just ask Rich. I'm sure that Rich is most likely as responsible as he says, but too bad about the blinders he's wearing. I'd guess he's probably in the business. |
New Jersey operator licensing
Wayne.B wrote: On 6 Apr 2006 10:29:45 -0700, wrote: Seems like a weak argument unless you can dispute any of my facts or sources. I can dispute your facts. This: We were out cruising last weekend and saw 4 PeeWCs. Two of them were weaving in and out of a crowded channel jumping wakes. The other two were pre teens circling a crowded anchorage while their parents enjoyed a few beers on the back deck of their rented houseboat. does not lead to or support this conclusion at all: Responsible operation is a VERY rare commodity with PeeWCs. (I know even you see that it's an unsupportable leap from two four irresponsible operators to responsible operation being "very rare.") ....however it does support the need for certification of all pwc operators (along with all power boaters) before they are legally allowed to operate a boat. richforman |
New Jersey operator licensing
Doug's characterization of what? Sounds like you missed my sarcasm in
the line you quoted above. My point was that the "marketing materials" Dave cited to support his contention that pwc's are marketed to encourage aggressive, irresponsible riding, were pretty obviously poor references to site in that they referred to models not manufactured for several years. In contrast I provided an exhaustive, extensive reference of the marketing materials currently being used to promote pwc's by all of the major manufacturers. I quoted their advertisements pretty much in their entireity for almost all of the current models. I successfully demonstrated that the primary factors being advertised were family use, comfort, modern clean-running technology, storage space, mild recreational boating, and once again, unlike apparently anyone else in the conversation, I know about this from extensive personal experience with pwc's and the people who enjoy them. I've helped friends and other people make purchase decisions on pwc's and know who these people are and what kind of experience they are looking for - family recreation with their children, enjoyment of being on the water, going to lunch or the beach or fishing or just enjoying beautiful scenery - not reckless aggressive antics. In fact in a few cases, pwc'ers, real enthusiasts and activists in the sport, have been among some of the most experienced and knowledgeable boaters I"ve known. Look, one aspect of pwc's is that they're pretty easy to buy and get onto. There's a democratic aspect to them that does result in newbies not knowing much what they're doing. My first season out there, eight years ago now, I definitely flew too fast through some anchorages and no-wake zones and probably annoyed some fellow boaters due to my ignorance. I hadn't had any training or boating experience. My bad behavior was not due to any inherent character flaw, or some evil quality of the type of boat I was piloting, but to lack of knowledge and experience, and with guidance from more experienced riders that I started riding with, I quickly learned the ropes and what to do, and for the succeeding eight years you wouldn't have seen me do anything like that. Obviously the same is true for any rider or boater - given a little more time and experience and knowledge, they will learn more and their behavior habits will improve. Hopefully if you see a pwc'er or other boater operating recklessly or breaking rules, you would point it out to them in a non-antagonistic, non-attitudinous manner that would help them see the error of their ways rather than giving them the finger or deciding out of hand that all pwc'ers must be losers. That's why I know for sure that requiring training in the basics is a good idea and would help, already is helping in many states, minimizet his kind of behavior. A great percentage of the problems that occur involve renters of pwc's - and that type of user has been basically eliminated in a stroke in NYC by requiring the certification, the rental business has gone away, and we responsible, knowledgeable, experienced riders support that change and welcome it - it makes the waters safer, and will eventually help counteract the prejudice, stereotyping, and outdated notions so many people have formed about us in the past. You guys are all ganging up on me cruelly with more insults piled on, I don't know why it is so difficult to admit that you don't know much about the topic, that you are prejucided about it and uninterested in becoming more informed, or reconsidering your impressions in the light of newer information. I don't know who Jim Cate is or what you're talking about and I'm sorry if my posts aren't entertaining you sufficiently. But I bring up valid points and I have every right to make my case - that you are being unfairly insulting toward me and my family and friends when you say unfounded inflammatory things like "responsible pwc operation is very rare." ALL My friends and family engage in responsible boating with our pwc's every weekend, and so do dozens, hundreds, thousands of other people in waterways everywhere, in riding groups across the country exactly analogous to any other boating groups of people who enjoy recreation on the water and in the outdoors. PWC'ers often conduct massive charity rides and events, are involved in important rescue operations that couldn't be executed by any other kind of vessel. If you saw me and my friends on the water, you would know that the things you say simply aren't true about pwc'ers in general. We boat considerately, responsibly, safely, knowledgeably, and undergo challenging adventures (long distance explorations, cruises, multi-day trips) all the time. There are lots of bad apples but they don't represent all of us. I will not relent in telling you about it until you just admit that you're not experts, your experience is limited and not particularly well-informed beyond the range of your "observations," you don't personally know many or any pwc'ers and thus arent' informed of making blanket judgments or pronouncements about all of us, and that there is a great deal on this topic that you are not aware of. You are entitled to be unaware, but admit that you don't know much about it. You don't really know who generally buys and rides the things and how they use them, or how these things have evoloved over the last five to ten years from the way things used to be. I'm not sure why it's so important to keep insulting me personally, I don't deserve it, I'm just defending myself, my family, children and friends. If you guys had open minds or any intellectual curiosity at all you would take another look at this issue and realize that things are changing fast. richforman |
New Jersey operator licensing
It's directly what I"m talking about. That you don't seem willing to
simply admit that you really don't know very much about pwc's and the people who buy and ride them. You have opinions but they're not particularly well-informed. You have a right to be ill-informed but you ought to just admit that that's the case. You have your views, you formed them a long time ago, and you're sticking to them, no massive changes in the industry or the market are going to budge you, and any source that suggests that your impressions might not be accurate or up to date, is simply propoganda. That is exactly the topic under discussion as far as I'm concerned. richforman |
New Jersey operator licensing
|
New Jersey operator licensing
|
New Jersey operator licensing
Wayne.B wrote:
On 7 Apr 2006 06:18:35 -0700, wrote: This: We were out cruising last weekend and saw 4 PeeWCs. Two of them were weaving in and out of a crowded channel jumping wakes. The other two were pre teens circling a crowded anchorage while their parents enjoyed a few beers on the back deck of their rented houseboat. does not lead to or support this conclusion at all: Responsible operation is a VERY rare commodity with PeeWCs. (I know even you see that it's an unsupportable leap from two four irresponsible operators to responsible operation being "very rare.") 4 out of 4 is 100%, and that is just from one day last week. Yes but it's only a sampling of 4! So not very conclusive. If your observations don't include lots of well-behaved responsible boaters on pwc's, then there's some bias in your method or something skewed about the population you're drawing your observations from, because there are thousands of us out here! Honest. This stuff goes on all the time unfortunately, not exceptional by any means. PeeWCs operated by anyone under the age of 30 should be restricted to privately owned swimming pools where they can go in endless circles all they want, no license required. Over age 30, no restrictions as long as they have their mother in law on board and a blood alcohol level in minus numbers. LOL, well I appreciate the humor in these comments. (Swimming pools, endless circles!) And I kind of agree, I wouldn't say 30, but I'd support no drivers under 16 without certified adults on board with them, and I think that is the rule here in NYS. At any rate, past 16, if an aspiring boater had the initiative and good attitude to just take the basic training course (or just take the exam, if he already has some experience and knowledge under his belt from his childhood, which was not the case in my situation), then they just wouldn't be able to help knowing a lot more about right and wrong behavior, regulations and laws, right-of-way and signalling of intent and nav-aids and docking and anchoring and navigating, safety precautions and procedures; and just absorbing the good influence of the nice guys who run the Power Squadron course and the others in the class....anyone who did that is gonna be a better boater for it, and probably trustworthy to ride around outside the pool. If they haven't learned the basics and demonstrated that level of accountability and responsibility, then no I don't want them there either. richforman |
New Jersey operator licensing
I am a cruiser and have every right to post here and join in these
conversations. (I also participate in lots of forums maybe more populated by more likeminded fellow boaters and pwc enthusiasts, but in a way this is more engaging and challenging.) PWC's aren't toys by the way, that's one of the first things that these irresponsible operators who annoy all of us, have to learn first. They're boats - when they're treated and looked on as toys, that's when a lot of the problems start. And I'm not any kind of speed-obsessed freak if that's what you're implying, I've no interest in motorcycles, fast cars or especially fast pwc's (mine's fast enough to give a reasonably exhilirating ride but I don't have to be the leader of the pack and am not by a long shot; I'm not fueled by testosterone-gripped frenzy as you seem to imply, I am a mature, responsible, grown adult boater with a wife and children. See? I don't fit your stereotypes. But I am a fellow cruiser, reasonably knowledgeable and experienced, I have planned and executed many ambitious and challenging long-distance cruises on the water like I talked about before. Probably more so than most other pwc'ers but I'm hardly the only one doing it. I deal with the same issues as any other cruising boater, I have to know how to navigate my way where I'm going, plan fuel stops and be prepared for any kind of contingency that might arise, know how to use gps and vhf and read charts and avoid going aground or running afoul of law enforcement, keep my passengers safe and comfortable, etc. etc. I cruise out on the open ocean, next weekend I am planning a long ride from Jones Beach, NY to Barnegat Inlet (have done it before) and beyond for an overnight trip, busy making the plans and arrangements even now, it's a passion of mine just like it is for many of you. Anyway my interest in boat cruising is what takes me to rec.boats.cruising, thanks very much. Last summer I spent a week cruising with my wife all around the Thousand Islands area in the St. Lawrenece Waterway, we visited and took pictures of all the state parks, castles, and dozens of the beautiful islands and other attractions there from the water. I'll link you to the album of hundreds of pictures my wife took. We weren't breaking any speed records or causing any trouble, just happily coexisting with the thousands of other boating enthusiasts out there. One great trip was with three other friends, we launched in Ft. Lauderdale and rode to Key West and back over a week on our pwc's, stopping at a different on-water resort each night, living off our boats, enjoying the mangrove trails and snorkeling at Pennekamp State Park, stopping for lunch at restuurants, all our gas stops planned out carefully and our eyes trained to our handlebar-mounted gps' for navigation the whole time. I want to know if any of these even tinily budges some of you guys' preconceived notions about pwc users and usage. The greatest trip of all was a crossing to the Bahamas for a four-day riding vacation, six of us on pwc's (some had their wife and kids meet them there, although I was still a bachelor back then a few years ago) with more exploring, touring, snorkeling, no aggressive highspeed antics, just a beautiful open-ocean cruise I'll never forget, four days of beautiful experiences on the water, and a nicely harrowing stretch through a scary squall line on the way back, but we hung together and made it fine - an adventure I"ll never forget. "THis is a cruising newsgroup." That's why I came. I belong here, I am a full-fledged cruising boater just like anybody, and I just will not lie down and take any bullying, insulting or discriminatory comments, and I won't step to the back of the bus, sorry fellas. richforman |
New Jersey operator licensing
Peter Wiley wrote: In article .com, wrote: Well your source for information is obviously way out of date because SeaDoo hasn't made the GTX RFI in a few years. Here's Seadoo's marketing blurb for their current flagship model on the CURRENT web site: "Roughing it is relative on the GTX and GTX SC. Packed with two powerful engine options, luxury to spare and smooth maneuverability. A top-notch boat that takes riding to a new place. Like your favorite camping spot. Or a little island hopping." Here's their description of another model: "If the journey is the reward, you may never reach your destination. Thanks to the uncompromising luxury of the 2006 GTX Limited. With a 215 HP engine, 215 f*****g HORSEPOWER? For *ONE* or *TWO* people on a goddam toy? My 6.5 tonne workboat only has 2 225 HP turbo diesel engines driving Hamilton jets, and it'll do in excess of 40 knots unladen! Thanks for that, you've confirmed my opinion. Those damn things should be banned from all public waterways. Far too much HP for any rational purpose. Makes sense! Let's ban 'em all because PDW says it's too much horsepower! What is the cut-off for an acceptable level of power, and who will be the arbiter of what qualifies as a "rational purpose"? Well, PDW, of course! And again - very important - your analysis here fails on one very important point: we're talking about boats, not toys! It's when anybody thinks or treats pwc's as toys, I suspect, that most of the conflicts and problems arise! (Operating them without knowing what they're doing, etc.) richforman PDW |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com