BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   Cruising (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/)
-   -   New Jersey operator licensing (https://www.boatbanter.com/cruising/68268-new-jersey-operator-licensing.html)

Wayne.B April 7th 06 01:28 AM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
On 6 Apr 2006 10:29:45 -0700, wrote:

Seems like a weak argument unless you can dispute any of my facts or
sources.


I can dispute your facts.

We were out cruising last weekend and saw 4 PeeWCs. Two of them were
weaving in and out of a crowded channel jumping wakes. The other two
were pre teens circling a crowded anchorage while their parents
enjoyed a few beers on the back deck of their rented houseboat.

Responsible operation is a VERY rare commodity with PeeWCs.


Wayne.B April 7th 06 04:15 AM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
On 6 Apr 2006 21:12:03 -0500, Dave wrote:

Just ask
Rich.


I'm sure that Rich is most likely as responsible as he says, but too
bad about the blinders he's wearing.

I'd guess he's probably in the business.


[email protected] April 7th 06 02:18 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 

Wayne.B wrote:
On 6 Apr 2006 10:29:45 -0700, wrote:

Seems like a weak argument unless you can dispute any of my facts or
sources.


I can dispute your facts.


This:

We were out cruising last weekend and saw 4 PeeWCs. Two of them were
weaving in and out of a crowded channel jumping wakes. The other two
were pre teens circling a crowded anchorage while their parents
enjoyed a few beers on the back deck of their rented houseboat.


does not lead to or support this conclusion at all:

Responsible operation is a VERY rare commodity with PeeWCs.


(I know even you see that it's an unsupportable leap from two four
irresponsible operators to responsible operation being "very rare.")

....however it does support the need for certification of all pwc
operators (along with all power boaters) before they are legally
allowed to operate a boat.

richforman


[email protected] April 7th 06 02:58 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
Doug's characterization of what? Sounds like you missed my sarcasm in
the line you quoted above. My point was that the "marketing materials"
Dave cited to support his contention that pwc's are marketed to
encourage aggressive, irresponsible riding, were pretty obviously poor
references to site in that they referred to models not manufactured for
several years.

In contrast I provided an exhaustive, extensive reference of the
marketing materials currently being used to promote pwc's by all of the
major manufacturers. I quoted their advertisements pretty much in
their entireity for almost all of the current models. I successfully
demonstrated that the primary factors being advertised were family use,
comfort, modern clean-running technology, storage space, mild
recreational boating, and once again, unlike apparently anyone else in
the conversation, I know about this from extensive personal experience
with pwc's and the people who enjoy them. I've helped friends and
other people make purchase decisions on pwc's and know who these people
are and what kind of experience they are looking for - family
recreation with their children, enjoyment of being on the water, going
to lunch or the beach or fishing or just enjoying beautiful scenery -
not reckless aggressive antics. In fact in a few cases, pwc'ers, real
enthusiasts and activists in the sport, have been among some of the
most experienced and knowledgeable boaters I"ve known.

Look, one aspect of pwc's is that they're pretty easy to buy and get
onto. There's a democratic aspect to them that does result in newbies
not knowing much what they're doing. My first season out there, eight
years ago now, I definitely flew too fast through some anchorages and
no-wake zones and probably annoyed some fellow boaters due to my
ignorance. I hadn't had any training or boating experience. My bad
behavior was not due to any inherent character flaw, or some evil
quality of the type of boat I was piloting, but to lack of knowledge
and experience, and with guidance from more experienced riders that I
started riding with, I quickly learned the ropes and what to do, and
for the succeeding eight years you wouldn't have seen me do anything
like that. Obviously the same is true for any rider or boater - given
a little more time and experience and knowledge, they will learn more
and their behavior habits will improve. Hopefully if you see a pwc'er
or other boater operating recklessly or breaking rules, you would point
it out to them in a non-antagonistic, non-attitudinous manner that
would help them see the error of their ways rather than giving them the
finger or deciding out of hand that all pwc'ers must be losers. That's
why I know for sure that requiring training in the basics is a good
idea and would help, already is helping in many states, minimizet his
kind of behavior. A great percentage of the problems that occur
involve renters of pwc's - and that type of user has been basically
eliminated in a stroke in NYC by requiring the certification, the
rental business has gone away, and we responsible, knowledgeable,
experienced riders support that change and welcome it - it makes the
waters safer, and will eventually help counteract the prejudice,
stereotyping, and outdated notions so many people have formed about us
in the past.

You guys are all ganging up on me cruelly with more insults piled on, I
don't know why it is so difficult to admit that you don't know much
about the topic, that you are prejucided about it and uninterested in
becoming more informed, or reconsidering your impressions in the light
of newer information.

I don't know who Jim Cate is or what you're talking about and I'm sorry
if my posts aren't entertaining you sufficiently. But I bring up valid
points and I have every right to make my case - that you are being
unfairly insulting toward me and my family and friends when you say
unfounded inflammatory things like "responsible pwc operation is very
rare." ALL My friends and family engage in responsible boating with
our pwc's every weekend, and so do dozens, hundreds, thousands of
other people in waterways everywhere, in riding groups across the
country exactly analogous to any other boating groups of people who
enjoy recreation on the water and in the outdoors. PWC'ers often
conduct massive charity rides and events, are involved in important
rescue operations that couldn't be executed by any other kind of
vessel.

If you saw me and my friends on the water, you would know that the
things you say simply aren't true about pwc'ers in general. We boat
considerately, responsibly, safely, knowledgeably, and undergo
challenging adventures (long distance explorations, cruises, multi-day
trips) all the time. There are lots of bad apples but they don't
represent all of us. I will not relent in telling you about it until
you just admit that you're not experts, your experience is limited and
not particularly well-informed beyond the range of your
"observations," you don't personally know many or any pwc'ers and thus
arent' informed of making blanket judgments or pronouncements about all
of us, and that there is a great deal on this topic that you are not
aware of. You are entitled to be unaware, but admit that you don't
know much about it. You don't really know who generally buys and rides
the things and how they use them, or how these things have evoloved
over the last five to ten years from the way things used to be.

I'm not sure why it's so important to keep insulting me personally, I
don't deserve it, I'm just defending myself, my family, children and
friends. If you guys had open minds or any intellectual curiosity at
all you would take another look at this issue and realize that things
are changing fast.

richforman


[email protected] April 7th 06 03:01 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
It's directly what I"m talking about. That you don't seem willing to
simply admit that you really don't know very much about pwc's and the
people who buy and ride them. You have opinions but they're not
particularly well-informed. You have a right to be ill-informed but
you ought to just admit that that's the case. You have your views, you
formed them a long time ago, and you're sticking to them, no massive
changes in the industry or the market are going to budge you, and any
source that suggests that your impressions might not be accurate or up
to date, is simply propoganda.

That is exactly the topic under discussion as far as I'm concerned.

richforman


prodigal1 April 7th 06 04:06 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
wrote:
snip
Did you see "Stripes"?
"Lighten up Francis."

This is a "cruising" newsgroup. Perhaps your interest in highspeed toys
for the those with too many toys might be better satisfied in another forum.

Wayne.B April 7th 06 06:47 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
On 7 Apr 2006 06:18:35 -0700, wrote:

This:

We were out cruising last weekend and saw 4 PeeWCs. Two of them were
weaving in and out of a crowded channel jumping wakes. The other two
were pre teens circling a crowded anchorage while their parents
enjoyed a few beers on the back deck of their rented houseboat.


does not lead to or support this conclusion at all:

Responsible operation is a VERY rare commodity with PeeWCs.


(I know even you see that it's an unsupportable leap from two four
irresponsible operators to responsible operation being "very rare.")


4 out of 4 is 100%, and that is just from one day last week.

This stuff goes on all the time unfortunately, not exceptional by any
means. PeeWCs operated by anyone under the age of 30 should be
restricted to privately owned swimming pools where they can go in
endless circles all they want, no license required.

Over age 30, no restrictions as long as they have their mother in law
on board and a blood alcohol level in minus numbers.


[email protected] April 7th 06 08:56 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
Wayne.B wrote:

On 7 Apr 2006 06:18:35 -0700, wrote:

This:

We were out cruising last weekend and saw 4 PeeWCs. Two of them were
weaving in and out of a crowded channel jumping wakes. The other two
were pre teens circling a crowded anchorage while their parents
enjoyed a few beers on the back deck of their rented houseboat.


does not lead to or support this conclusion at all:

Responsible operation is a VERY rare commodity with PeeWCs.


(I know even you see that it's an unsupportable leap from two four
irresponsible operators to responsible operation being "very rare.")


4 out of 4 is 100%, and that is just from one day last week.


Yes but it's only a sampling of 4! So not very conclusive. If your
observations don't include lots of well-behaved responsible boaters on
pwc's, then there's some bias in your method or something skewed about
the population you're drawing your observations from,
because there are thousands of us out here! Honest.

This stuff goes on all the time unfortunately, not exceptional by any
means. PeeWCs operated by anyone under the age of 30 should be
restricted to privately owned swimming pools where they can go in
endless circles all they want, no license required.

Over age 30, no restrictions as long as they have their mother in law
on board and a blood alcohol level in minus numbers.


LOL, well I appreciate the humor in these comments. (Swimming pools,
endless circles!) And I kind of agree, I wouldn't say 30, but I'd
support no drivers under 16 without certified adults on board with
them, and I think that is the rule here in NYS.
At any rate, past 16, if an aspiring boater had the initiative and good
attitude to just take the basic training course (or just take the exam,
if he already has some experience and knowledge under his belt from his
childhood, which was not the case in my situation), then they just
wouldn't be able to help knowing a lot more about right and wrong
behavior, regulations and laws, right-of-way and signalling of intent
and nav-aids and docking and anchoring and navigating, safety
precautions and procedures;
and just absorbing the good influence of the nice guys who run the
Power Squadron course and the others in the class....anyone who did
that is gonna be a better boater for it, and probably trustworthy to
ride around outside the pool. If they haven't learned the basics and
demonstrated that level of accountability and responsibility, then no I
don't want them there either.

richforman


[email protected] April 7th 06 09:12 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 
I am a cruiser and have every right to post here and join in these
conversations. (I also participate in lots of forums maybe more
populated by more likeminded fellow boaters and pwc enthusiasts, but in
a way this is more engaging and challenging.) PWC's aren't toys by the
way, that's one of the first things that these irresponsible operators
who annoy all of us, have to learn first. They're boats - when they're
treated and looked on as toys, that's when a lot of the problems start.
And I'm not any kind of speed-obsessed freak if that's what you're
implying, I've no interest in motorcycles, fast cars or especially fast
pwc's (mine's fast enough to give a reasonably exhilirating ride but I
don't have to be the leader of the pack and am not by a long shot; I'm
not fueled by testosterone-gripped frenzy as you seem to imply, I am a
mature, responsible, grown adult boater with a wife and children. See?
I don't fit your stereotypes.

But I am a fellow cruiser, reasonably knowledgeable and experienced, I
have planned and executed many ambitious and challenging long-distance
cruises on the water like I talked about before. Probably more so than
most other pwc'ers but I'm hardly the only one doing it. I deal with
the same issues as any other cruising boater, I have to know how to
navigate my way where I'm going, plan fuel stops and be prepared for
any kind of contingency that might arise, know how to use gps and vhf
and read charts and avoid going aground or running afoul of law
enforcement, keep my passengers safe and comfortable, etc. etc. I
cruise out on the open ocean, next weekend I am planning a long ride
from Jones Beach, NY to Barnegat Inlet (have done it before) and beyond
for an overnight trip, busy making the plans and arrangements even now,
it's a passion of mine just like it is for many of you. Anyway my
interest in boat cruising is what takes me to rec.boats.cruising,
thanks very much. Last summer I spent a week cruising with my wife all
around the Thousand Islands area in the St. Lawrenece Waterway, we
visited and took pictures of all the state parks, castles, and dozens
of the beautiful islands and other attractions there from the water.
I'll link you to the album of hundreds of pictures my wife took. We
weren't breaking any speed records or causing any trouble, just happily
coexisting with the thousands of other boating enthusiasts out there.
One great trip was with three other friends, we launched in Ft.
Lauderdale and rode to Key West and back over a week on our pwc's,
stopping at a different on-water resort each night, living off our
boats, enjoying the mangrove trails and snorkeling at Pennekamp State
Park, stopping for lunch at restuurants, all our gas stops planned out
carefully and our eyes trained to our handlebar-mounted gps' for
navigation the whole time. I want to know if any of these even tinily
budges some of you guys' preconceived notions about pwc users and
usage. The greatest trip of all was a crossing to the Bahamas for a
four-day riding vacation, six of us on pwc's (some had their wife and
kids meet them there, although I was still a bachelor back then a few
years ago) with more exploring, touring, snorkeling, no aggressive
highspeed antics, just a beautiful open-ocean cruise I'll never forget,
four days of beautiful experiences on the water, and a nicely harrowing
stretch through a scary squall line on the way back, but we hung
together and made it fine - an adventure I"ll never forget. "THis is
a cruising newsgroup." That's why I came. I belong here, I am a
full-fledged cruising boater just like anybody, and I just will not lie
down and take any bullying, insulting or discriminatory comments, and I
won't step to the back of the bus, sorry fellas.

richforman


[email protected] April 7th 06 09:56 PM

New Jersey operator licensing
 

Peter Wiley wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Well your source for information is obviously way out of date because
SeaDoo hasn't made the GTX RFI in a few years.

Here's Seadoo's marketing blurb for their current flagship model on the
CURRENT web site:
"Roughing it is relative on the GTX and GTX SC. Packed with two
powerful engine options, luxury to spare and smooth maneuverability. A
top-notch boat that takes riding to a new place. Like your favorite
camping spot. Or a little island hopping."

Here's their description of another model:

"If the journey is the reward, you may never reach your destination.
Thanks to the uncompromising luxury of the 2006 GTX Limited. With a 215
HP engine,


215 f*****g HORSEPOWER? For *ONE* or *TWO* people on a goddam toy? My
6.5 tonne workboat only has 2 225 HP turbo diesel engines driving
Hamilton jets, and it'll do in excess of 40 knots unladen!

Thanks for that, you've confirmed my opinion. Those damn things should
be banned from all public waterways. Far too much HP for any rational
purpose.


Makes sense! Let's ban 'em all because PDW says it's too much
horsepower! What is the cut-off for an acceptable level of power, and
who will be the arbiter of what qualifies as a "rational purpose"?
Well, PDW, of course!

And again - very important - your analysis here fails on one very
important point: we're talking about boats, not toys! It's when
anybody thinks or treats pwc's as toys, I suspect, that most of the
conflicts and problems arise! (Operating them without knowing what
they're doing, etc.)


richforman

PDW




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com