Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MAIN PROBLEM I HAVE WITH THEM IS I STEPPED ON ONE AT THE ANNAPOLIS SAILBOAT
SHOW A FEW YEARS AGO AND THE ENTIRE DECK WAS VERY SPONGY .....NOT STIFF AT ALL ...I WORRY ABOUT THE CONSTRUCTION ....I THINK THEY WENT VERY LITE TO MAKE SPEED ...BUT I GUESS THATS FINE IF YOU DON'T GET CAUGHT IN A BAD SPOT wrote in message ups.com... I'll admit, I have never looked at a Mac 26 from closer than 50' and that they have a bad reputation as the builder of the old Venture boats. However, if whayt they say is correct on their site, they have incorporated many of the things that were the hallmarks of good sailboat construction in the 80s. For example, they say they use a bolted hull to deck joint rather than the rivets on some boats (Beneteau I think). I agree with them about their philosophy about the use of glass rather than balsa or foam core as a properly made glass structure can be stronger than the cored one. Furthermore, their mass production methods is a good way to achieve high quality without high cost. Hand made is often poorly made. So, I cannot diss them without looking at one but I can see some good things if what their site says is correct. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Nov 2005 15:27:04 -0600, Dave wrote:
I'm pleased with the result. The 5 1/2' draft fin keel does limit our getting in to a few places, and I do have to put on the autopilot for the boat to sail itself, but the tradeoff in speed was well worth it. I totally understand that. In fact, I'm trying to "long-term loan" my current C&C design (fast if old) so I don't have to sell it when I buy a passagmaking boat. We'll have no schedule to keep, and I would prefer exactly those features you cite when doing a circ. When I get back though, I would sell it pronto and take up where I left off with my cruiser-racer, far more appropriate for the light air and only rarely shoal waters of Lake Ontario. R. |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Dene" dene@(nospam) ipns.com wrote: It seems that the Mac 26 is a hybrid which brings me to my question, is it the design/versatility that a sailer purist abhors, or is it the quality of workmanship, or both? Pretty much both. It's not great at anything, and it's very "lightly built". Our previous boat was the Mac 21. When another boat clipped us while we were moored, we suffered an astounding amount of damage and we couldn't stint on maintenance as there was little reserve strength. BUT, we sailed her for almost a decade. We did some astoundingly stupid things and she didn't let us down. Was a blast getting into areas too shallow for some dinks. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote that COULD be sailed accross the Gulf, but, on balance, I think we will probably get in more sailing on our Mac than most of the owners of these larger boats. Most real sailors would not want to ''sail' on your Mac. SBV |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scotty wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote that COULD be sailed accross the Gulf, but, on balance, I think we will probably get in more sailing on our Mac than most of the owners of these larger boats. Most real sailors would not want to ''sail' on your Mac. SBV And most of those "real sailors," as you call them have never sailed a Mac. - A few have, but most wouldn't want to get on a Mac for fear that one of their "real sailor" buddies might see them and look down their noses at them. (I suggest that those who enjoy getting "atta-boys" by criticising the Macs on this ng should at least provide a disclaimer if they haven't sailed one of the recent (26M) models. In other words, a disclaimer telling us that they really don't know what the hell they are talking about.) Bottom line: The Macs aren't ocean-crossing, blue water boats, but they are, nevertheless, still fun to sail. Jim |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesterday, Ihad the opportunity to finally see a new Mac26 up close. I
was able to walk around her on her trailer but was not able to go aboard or even look inside. From what i saw, I was impressed with workmanship although her fittings seemed light. Her shrouds seemed the right size but the fittings were sorta small to save weight. Her two visible winches seemd small for what I am used to. However, I assume her sail is also small to account for this. The double rudder looked weird but thats ok. I assume the water ballast fills most of the entire volume below the waterline so it seems like a lot. From the cabin top, I think she must have far more interior volume than most boats of that size. I would feel weird going over the cabin top to the forpeak but would get used to it. I was mostly impressed by the mast raising rig and the trailer made just for her with many thoughts to details unique to her. Many people say the Mac26 is ugly but I do not think so although I may be aesthetically challenged. Similar boats that I do think are ugly are the old and poorly made Buccaneer Bayliner (mostly occupying landfills now) and Morgan Out Island boats. If you like boats purely for traditional lines, the mac26 will be ugly to you. If you like utilitarian designs, you might admire her looks. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote Most real sailors would not want to ''sail' on your Mac. SBV And most of those "real sailors," as you call them have never sailed a Mac. - A few have, but most wouldn't want to get on a Mac Well, OK then, as long as we're agreed. Scotty |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scotty wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote Most real sailors would not want to ''sail' on your Mac. SBV And most of those "real sailors," as you call them have never sailed a Mac. - A few have, but most wouldn't want to get on a Mac (Because of what their "real sailor" buddies might say about them.) If they did, they might discover that they liked the Mac.- - That would REALLY be embarrassing. Well, OK then, as long as we're agreed. Yes, we're pretty much in agreement. Jim |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Cate wrote: And most of those "real sailors," as you call them have never sailed a Mac. - A few have, but most wouldn't want to get on a Mac for fear that one of their "real sailor" buddies might see them and look down their noses at them. (I suggest that those who enjoy getting "atta-boys" by criticising the Macs on this ng should at least provide a disclaimer if they haven't sailed one of the recent (26M) models. In other words, a disclaimer telling us that they really don't know what the hell they are talking about.)br I have. I think their garbage boats. You're just upset because you bought a piece of junk. Bottom line: The Macs aren't ocean-crossing, blue water boats, but they are, nevertheless, still fun to sail. br YEah, in very protected waters, in very limited situations. Good for you.. enjoy your Mac. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|