Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dene wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... The thread about crossing the atlantic in a Mac 26 was getting too long and isnt really interesting. HOWEVER, to say that a Mac 26 sails poorly means little as so do other "real" sailboats like the entire Morgan Outisland series. Remember the Westsail, Practical Sailor called it the "Wet Snail" . As far as the Dawson 26 mentioned as an ocean crosser in the other thread, PS called it the "Doghouse 26". So, ultimate sailing ability may mean little. Consider that most coastal cruiosers report spending about 70% of their time motoring and you might get a different perspective on the Mac26. You might consider it to be a motorboat with the ability to sail. Unlike most motorboats, this one has the safety factor of being able to sail home. Does this make it safer than the average motorboat used for cruising? Do the properties of the Mac26 allow its owners to go more places than most other sailboats.......probably. Is the Mac26 safe enough compared to most other motorboats to allow its owner to safely cruise over to the Bahamas under power? Consider that its speed under power may allow it to use narrow weather windows that other sailboats could not or that time spent at sea might sdetermine your probability of getting caught out in bad weatrher and maybe the Mac26 speed under power gives it an edge in safety. I do not see the Mac 26 as an ocean crosser but as a way for people to sail in many places. True, they will almost always sail in wind less than 20 kts but that is what most of us want to do anyway. I'm on a learning curve in all things sailing, having only been on one once. It seems that the Mac 26 is a hybrid which brings me to my question, is it the design/versatility that a sailer purist abhors, or is it the quality of workmanship, or both? If the latter, are there hybrid boats that are built better, perhaps one with a retractable/trailerable keel? Every time I fill up my recently acquired powerboat, I think about the benefits of sailing. -Greg It is the windage of a large superstructure, and an outboard motor in windy waters. It seems a seductive death trap. I am not sure I would want to sail it in rough weather to find out how it goes. Otherwise, it seems fine for a light pleasure toy, roomy, comfortable, full of amenities. Simple as that. Terry K |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Dene" dene@(nospam) ipns.com wrote: It seems that the Mac 26 is a hybrid which brings me to my question, is it the design/versatility that a sailer purist abhors, or is it the quality of workmanship, or both? Pretty much both. It's not great at anything, and it's very "lightly built". Our previous boat was the Mac 21. When another boat clipped us while we were moored, we suffered an astounding amount of damage and we couldn't stint on maintenance as there was little reserve strength. BUT, we sailed her for almost a decade. We did some astoundingly stupid things and she didn't let us down. Was a blast getting into areas too shallow for some dinks. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote that COULD be sailed accross the Gulf, but, on balance, I think we will probably get in more sailing on our Mac than most of the owners of these larger boats. Most real sailors would not want to ''sail' on your Mac. SBV |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Scotty wrote: "Jim Cate" wrote that COULD be sailed accross the Gulf, but, on balance, I think we will probably get in more sailing on our Mac than most of the owners of these larger boats. Most real sailors would not want to ''sail' on your Mac. SBV And most of those "real sailors," as you call them have never sailed a Mac. - A few have, but most wouldn't want to get on a Mac for fear that one of their "real sailor" buddies might see them and look down their noses at them. (I suggest that those who enjoy getting "atta-boys" by criticising the Macs on this ng should at least provide a disclaimer if they haven't sailed one of the recent (26M) models. In other words, a disclaimer telling us that they really don't know what the hell they are talking about.) Bottom line: The Macs aren't ocean-crossing, blue water boats, but they are, nevertheless, still fun to sail. Jim |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yesterday, Ihad the opportunity to finally see a new Mac26 up close. I
was able to walk around her on her trailer but was not able to go aboard or even look inside. From what i saw, I was impressed with workmanship although her fittings seemed light. Her shrouds seemed the right size but the fittings were sorta small to save weight. Her two visible winches seemd small for what I am used to. However, I assume her sail is also small to account for this. The double rudder looked weird but thats ok. I assume the water ballast fills most of the entire volume below the waterline so it seems like a lot. From the cabin top, I think she must have far more interior volume than most boats of that size. I would feel weird going over the cabin top to the forpeak but would get used to it. I was mostly impressed by the mast raising rig and the trailer made just for her with many thoughts to details unique to her. Many people say the Mac26 is ugly but I do not think so although I may be aesthetically challenged. Similar boats that I do think are ugly are the old and poorly made Buccaneer Bayliner (mostly occupying landfills now) and Morgan Out Island boats. If you like boats purely for traditional lines, the mac26 will be ugly to you. If you like utilitarian designs, you might admire her looks. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Cate" wrote Most real sailors would not want to ''sail' on your Mac. SBV And most of those "real sailors," as you call them have never sailed a Mac. - A few have, but most wouldn't want to get on a Mac Well, OK then, as long as we're agreed. Scotty |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jim Cate wrote: And most of those "real sailors," as you call them have never sailed a Mac. - A few have, but most wouldn't want to get on a Mac for fear that one of their "real sailor" buddies might see them and look down their noses at them. (I suggest that those who enjoy getting "atta-boys" by criticising the Macs on this ng should at least provide a disclaimer if they haven't sailed one of the recent (26M) models. In other words, a disclaimer telling us that they really don't know what the hell they are talking about.)br I have. I think their garbage boats. You're just upset because you bought a piece of junk. Bottom line: The Macs aren't ocean-crossing, blue water boats, but they are, nevertheless, still fun to sail. br YEah, in very protected waters, in very limited situations. Good for you.. enjoy your Mac. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, we are about to get out in the blue water off Galveston and
cruise offshore (initial heading approximately 110 degrees). I'll try to post an update to the ng next week. In any event, I'll be off the net for a week or so but hope to make it back safely and report in sometime next month. Happy sailing to all. Jim wrote: The thread about crossing the atlantic in a Mac 26 was getting too long and isnt really interesting. HOWEVER, to say that a Mac 26 sails poorly means little as so do other "real" sailboats like the entire Morgan Outisland series. Remember the Westsail, Practical Sailor called it the "Wet Snail" . As far as the Dawson 26 mentioned as an ocean crosser in the other thread, PS called it the "Doghouse 26". So, ultimate sailing ability may mean little. Consider that most coastal cruiosers report spending about 70% of their time motoring and you might get a different perspective on the Mac26. You might consider it to be a motorboat with the ability to sail. Unlike most motorboats, this one has the safety factor of being able to sail home. Does this make it safer than the average motorboat used for cruising? Do the properties of the Mac26 allow its owners to go more places than most other sailboats.......probably. Is the Mac26 safe enough compared to most other motorboats to allow its owner to safely cruise over to the Bahamas under power? Consider that its speed under power may allow it to use narrow weather windows that other sailboats could not or that time spent at sea might sdetermine your probability of getting caught out in bad weatrher and maybe the Mac26 speed under power gives it an edge in safety. I do not see the Mac 26 as an ocean crosser but as a way for people to sail in many places. True, they will almost always sail in wind less than 20 kts but that is what most of us want to do anyway. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|