Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:24:34 -0700, "Bob La Londe" said: Of course the biggest arguement about the value of their warrantless searches and lack of need for cause it is also valid for private homes on dry land. Most homes are considerably less mobile than a vessel. That's why, for example, the rules are different for searches of a car as against searches of a home. In theory a warrant or sufficient PC is required to search a car or other motor vehicle in the US. A basic moving violation is not considered PC for a search. Practice and legality don't always go hand in hand. -- Bob La Londe http://www.YumaBassMan.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kiss my legs please! | ASA | |||
( OT ) Bush in the National Guard: A primer | General | |||
Just a few names... | General | |||
Anyone using Sponsons? | Touring |