Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Hi, Doug
Thanks for reminding me of the old name "fisherman's reef" for the boom-into-wind rather than bows-into-wind technique! DSK wrote: controversy: why do so many people think they should turn on their engine? Have they all forgotten how to *sail*? Couldn't agree more. However, generations of sailors have been taught (usually under relatively benign wind and wave conditions) to turn their bows straight into the wind when wanting to make major sail adjustments. When they first try to do that in a big blow they get the shock of their life when all hell breaks loose, the bow blows off faster than they can say "o sh$t" and flogging sails can (and will) selfdestruct in a matter of seconds. Turning on the engine primarily enables them to keep the bows from blowing off (so they can let the sails flog even longer......). When sailing a finkeeler with high bows that blow off fast, such as our Legend 43, a medium-sized staysail that can be flattened + inboard sheeted nicely and deployed in an instant is worth its weight in gold. To raise sail without the use of an engine, even in boisterous conditions, we just hoist or unfurl the staysail, sheet it in pretty good and put the vessel on a close-hauled course after picking up a bit of speed. If the staysail set is any good it should easily prevent the bows from blowing off by powering up the rudder. Then one can simply pull the boom to leeward (with the traveler) slack off the mainsheet a bit and start hoisting the main. In other words, a "fisherman's reef" in reverse. No mess, no fuss, no slamming and flogging. I wish sailing instructors would teach that to their pupils, rather than the mindless, knee-jerk "steering straight into the wind" routine. This is a decision one has to make in a snap... run off (bear away) or head up into the wind? One of the factors that I'd consider is the boat's current point of sail. Anywhere below a beam reach, run off. Between a beam reach and close reach, it would depend on what sails were set and the handling characteristics of the particular boat. Above a beam reach, particularly if close hauled, there is nothing to be gained by bearing away in a squall and the boat may not answer her helm well enough if the squall lays her over. If one is "only surprised" by a squall (i.e. in the sense of perhaps reefing a bit too late but not completely losing control), I fully concur with that approach. However, in major "caught off-guard" squall situations -- e.g. the violent williwaws I described -- the most likely scenario is that the vessel broaches almost immediately, thereby loosing its previous point of sail orientation (not to mention the fact that many types of violent squalls produce a different wind direction). Now the first concern should be to try and recover from the broach by slacking off the sheets while the second step is to decide on the best possible course as soon as the rudder powers up again. If the broached vessel has a staysail or smaller jib that can be sheeted in and flattened in an instance, I would indeed choose to head up into the wind and use the fisherman's reef approach to drop or reef the main. However, if flying a big overlapping genoa before the broach, trying into the wind may be asking for trouble. Even with a partially furled large genoa one will probably not be able to point high enough to do a fisherman's reef on the main. In that case, I would opt for running off, at least long enough to get the large genoa (or perhaps drifter) under control rather than to risk damage by flogging. One issue with furling the jib is that the balance of the boat will change. I agree. In our case the staysail provided enough balance (while helping to blanket the genoa as it was being furled). If one does not have that option, I would advise to leave just enough of the genoa unfurled to help keep the COE forward of the CLR. Under no circumstance should one try to pull in on the mainsheet, however, while running off with little or no headsail under violent squall conditions. This brings the CEO back and the result is "broach city" (as the next poster describes). If you're pulling down the mainsail, wouldn't the sheet be hauled in so that the crew can reach the boom in the first place? As explained above, I would only dare to pull the mainsheet in just enough to get the main off the spreaders while clawing the slides down at the mast. In our williwaw adventure, I first pulled the luff down far enough to secure the 3rd reef cringle at the tack and then started bringing the boom in far enough to rerig the reef lines at the clew. Under third reef and staysail we then finally turned back into the squall in order not to lose more hard-won miles. Altogether, we managed not to break a single batten or slide, let alone tear any sails. Fresh Breezes- Doug King Likewise! Henk Meuzelaar |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Regardless of how it happened, assume it did.
1. Ease mainsheet to allow boat to begin to right itself. 2. Begin furling the jib (yes, it will furl on any point of sail). while easing its sheets. I forget that many boats do not have all sail halyards led to cockpit and going up onto the cabin top in a broach must be frightening. Sails are cheap, life isnt, let em flog if necessary Forget sillies who claim to eschew engine use. Boats have engines for a reason, in danger, use it. BTW, my old non-roller furling jib had a downhaul for just such occasions for FL thunderstorms. Would a downhaul led to the cockpit work for the main? With any force on the main, it will not fall by itself but you can always muscle it down unless it gets caught in the spreaders. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Mostly, I agree...
wrote in message oups.com... Regardless of how it happened, assume it did. 1. Ease mainsheet to allow boat to begin to right itself. 2. Begin furling the jib (yes, it will furl on any point of sail). while easing its sheets. That's good if you can do it. Sometimes, the pressure is so great on the jib, that I've found it impossible to furl or when furled doesn't furl the whole way because the jib becomes wound too tight and runs out. I forget that many boats do not have all sail halyards led to cockpit and going up onto the cabin top in a broach must be frightening. Sails are cheap, life isnt, let em flog if necessary Forget sillies who claim to eschew engine use. Boats have engines for a reason, in danger, use it. Yes, but you need to be absolutely certain that lines are not in the water of course. BTW, my old non-roller furling jib had a downhaul for just such occasions for FL thunderstorms. Would a downhaul led to the cockpit work for the main? With any force on the main, it will not fall by itself but you can always muscle it down unless it gets caught in the spreaders. Worked for my boat. If nothing else, it'll help. They're easy to rig. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
DSK wrote:
A downhaul can be a good thing. Rarely see them on mainsails but it can certainly work. If you have properly rigged lazyjacks, they reduce the odds of getting things caught in the spreaders, too. Fresh Breezes- Doug King A number of owners of my class of boat have rigged mainsail downhauls to help in singlehanded sailing. I will be doing same when My main & jib eturn from a local sailmaker. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-05-31, Flying Tadpole wrote:
I sail with arcane rigs, so some of what I do isn't translatable. However, on both the light schooner and Lady Kate the AS29, turning up into a bullet is a recipe for capsize and swamping in the one, and knockdown in the other. The light schooner (a boat requiring crew) as an open and low boat would already be sailing with her lee rail down. A sharp turn into the wind would knock her down further, assisted by a powerful spade rudder tending to act as an elevator plane because of the angle, both reinforcing the knockdown; also stop her dead allowing the waves to take her over also. Bearing away, turning downwind, brings the boat up to level rather than heeled. I'm trying to picture turning up producing more heeling force and having difficulty. I've been sailing dinghies recently and if hit by a gust, feathering up reduces the heeling force whilst bearing away places more of the sail square on to the wind and increases the heeling. How is the schooner different? -- Andy Repton |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Andy Repton wrote: On 2005-05-31, Flying Tadpole wrote: I sail with arcane rigs, so some of what I do isn't translatable. However, on both the light schooner and Lady Kate the AS29, turning up into a bullet is a recipe for capsize and swamping in the one, and knockdown in the other. The light schooner (a boat requiring crew) as an open and low boat would already be sailing with her lee rail down. A sharp turn into the wind would knock her down further, assisted by a powerful spade rudder tending to act as an elevator plane because of the angle, both reinforcing the knockdown; also stop her dead allowing the waves to take her over also. Bearing away, turning downwind, brings the boat up to level rather than heeled. I'm trying to picture turning up producing more heeling force and having difficulty. I've been sailing dinghies recently and if hit by a gust, feathering up reduces the heeling force whilst bearing away places more of the sail square on to the wind and increases the heeling. How is the schooner different? First, we always sailed her as hard as possible, so anywhere on the wind the lee rail would tend to be a few inches above the water. Think "not much scope for error" Second, the rudder is way aft, deep and powerful, pintle hung and _not_ balanced, carrying over a quarter of the lateral plane the daggerboard carries half-and-a-bit when heeled, and the chine (sharpie hull) carries the rest. Think "lots of water/pressure at the rudder" Third, the boat, though half a ton with a two-up crew, is as rapid in response to helm movement as a small dinghy and will be travelling, in the circumstances described, well over hull speed. 8-12 knots depending on where the wind is. Think "momentum" Putting the helm down to round up, sets the rudder, on an already heeling hull, acting like an elevator plane, heeling the boat further as she starts spinnong ruound. At this point, the lee rail cuts under...boat slows, and blows over (or would, but we've probably let fly the sheets at this point, of up to four sails. Incidentally, the hull shape is sufficiently narrow for its length _not_ to also suddenly transform the boat into a foul mouthed broaching monster, which is what happens to most of the trailable yachts in her sailing grounds. The falling off when hit by a bullet is also a standard catamaran trick, and we used it to the same advantage. Bullet? Fall off, come more upright, pick up speed, come back on course at higher speed. Really too much bullet? Ease the sheet while doing so. Really, really too much bullet? Still fall off to recover, then come to the wind while easing sheets (staying as upright as possible) and heave to to reef. Incidentally, the boat fore-reaches at about 2knots hove-to, so in close proximity to obstacles, reefing is done as fast as possible. More info on the website, from memory -- Flying Tadpole ------------------------- http://www.flyingtadpole.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kiss my legs please! | ASA | |||
( OT ) Bush in the National Guard: A primer | General | |||
OT More on Bush's Guard Lies | General | |||
Just a few names... | General |