Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Peter Bennett" wrote in message
news.com... On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:37:50 -0700, "JG" wrote: Peter, we have a Y30 in our fleet. I find it to be a great boat... the engine in the front was a bit strange at first, but it seems to do quite well in heavy chop.. much less hobby horsing that you typically get. How long did you have it? Did you have any significant problems? I think the only thing I don't like about it is that it has a full rig, and that means no big jibs (we sail in SF bay). Our isn't set up for single-handing also. I had a later model Yamaha 30 - it had the engine aft, but most others around here had it forward. I think the yen got too expensive shortly after the aft-engine model was introduced, as mine was one of the last ones imported. Ah... yeh, ours has the engine under the v-berth... long prop shaft, with the engine intake right next to the shaft. We have a big sign next to the valve that says watch your fingers. I had a tall rig, and had a 160% genoa, if i recall correctly. Don't see why the tall rig would restrict you to small foresails. It doesn't. It's just that we can't take advantage of the three larger sails, because we get so much wind on a regular basis here. My boat had a tiller, and the only modification I made for single-handing was to rig a "tiller holder", so the tiller would stay where I put it (for a short time, at least). I also had an autopilot, which helped somewhat... Ours is a wheel. I had a "tiller tender" on my Cal 20. Worked great. It gave me up to about a minute of hands-free. I had the boat for about 10 years, then decided to become a stinkpotter, as I had spent too much time sitting outside in the rain. -- Peter Bennett, VE7CEI peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca new newsgroup users info : http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver.powersquadron.ca |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Dave wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:24:52 -0400, Jeff said: However, you were quite specific that you were looking for a Chesapeake Bay cruiser, that could also be used for more extended coastal cruising. In these situations it is very unlikely that you would need to heave to. In fact its usually not desirable if you're closer than 50 miles to land. Have to disagree there. I often find it useful when single-handing on LI Sound, particularly when dropping the sails. Dave I'm not sure what you mean. The "heaving to" that we're discussing is a heavy weather technique for sloops where the jib is backed and the helm is down. A Nonsuch without a jib, and even a Freedom with a small jib can't really do this. I don't understand how you do this as you "drop the sails," though I can imagine that on a normal boat you might want to stall it while you drop the main. On a Nonsuch, of course, the wishbone with lazy jacks does a rather good job of gathering the main, and with no other sail, the engine is likely running (or you're at anchor) when you drop sail. I know that some singlehander will heave to make lunch, or do some other chore, but with modern autopilots it isn't really a necessity. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
(initiator of thread) Thanks for the suggestions and comments. One of
the problems that I am having in narrowing my selection is due to the fact that my principle harbor, Havre de Grace, MD, has one marina of significant size and, I swear, 90% of the boats are either Hunters or Catalinas (the marina is also a dealership for these boats - there is kind of a 'monopoly' feel about the place, though everybody is nice and it does not have that 'uppity' feel that Annapolis has. That most buy from product from the 'oligopoly' is not a bad thing, but when I walk around I do not run into owners of Freedoms, Bristols, or even Sabres and Tartans, etc. So, like others here, I have to rely on forums like these to narrow my search. I plan to buy in the Fall before the boats are out of the water. I need time to raise cash, but I also suspect that it is a decent time to buy, much like waiting for October to purchase a motorcycle. This weekend I may again drive down to Annapolis, this time to see a Bristol 27.7 and 29.9. There is also a nice looking Freedom 32 listed with Rouguewaves, and a 30' Sabre with a smaller broker. I am definately thinking smaller (and feeling wealthier). The Tartan 37, Ericson 38, etc. are now off of my short list. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I have been searching under the assumption that a 30-32' J-Boat would
be a bear to single-hand, except for highly skilled/experienced sailors, because it is built (light with substantial sail area) principally for crewed races. Am I wrong? Thanks |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Frank wrote:
Under sail, general handling while raising and lowering sails, switching to engine, anchoring, mooring, etc. my experience has been that a Freedom 36 (or 38) is infinitely easier to singlehand than any "standard" Marconi-rig sub-30 footer. And yes that includes singlehanding a tri-radial 'chute, which I wouldn't even try on most keelboats. I think that, once again, "it depends." I single hand a 28 foot sloop and routinely set a conventional tri-radial spinnaker without mishap. I'm no athlete or "diehard" racer, but I like to keep the boat moving, and that's what's required. However once you get up near 40 feet, a tri-radial can get to be a lot of cloth very quickly. In addition the average bloke will usually decide it's just too much trouble in many cases, and resort to fossil fuels. Among the cruising people I've known, laziness is often considered a virtue. And going to 40 ft., I'll remind y'all that Garry Hoyt singlehanded his *engineless* prototype Freedom 40 all around the Caribbean, winning races against full crews, and anchoring and docking in notoriously crowded harbors ... And the Freedom 44 is essentially the same setup as the 40. So, AFAIC, we're up to 44 feet and still comfortably singlehanding. With the right boat. There are individual cases on both ends that support whatever argument is in need of support. Michael Ritchie sailed "Jester" all over the place, and someone or other sailed "Mediteranee" (sp?) to those same places. "Jester" was about 26 feet, and the other multi-masted monster was ten times her length. Length alone is not a limiting factor, but for average folks it's a reasonable indicator. I think the main factor for practical people is that while length increases linearly, related items do not. Volume, weight, equipment size, and cost definitely do not stay within the bounds as length increases. And in my experience it's usually the smaller boats that leave the mooring regularly, while the larger boats are waiting either for crew, or for refrigeration spares and parts. -- Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://kerrydeare.home.comcast.net/ |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
single sailing clubs in Pensacola Area? | Cruising | |||
Perkins diesel question | UK Power Boats | |||
Perkins diesel question | Cruising | |||
Other choice and counterpoise question | Electronics |