So you were just imitating an illiterate idiot. Sure, that's what you
claim now.



JR Gilbreath wrote:
Sarcasm sure goes over your head. I suppose it because of where you
keep you head.


Jeff Morris wrote:

JR Gilbreath wrote:

Well duh! Of course I thought Detroit, Chicago and Philadelphia were
southen cities.



I don't know how you define "Southern." Detroit and Chicago are at
the same latitude as Boston. Detroit even borders Canada.

Get a life.



Get an education.

Also, if you get murdered you are just as dead in a city of 500,000+
as you are in one with 1,000 people.



So? I was only pointing out that your stat was only for large cities,
and there are many small cities in the South that have the same high
murder rate. Perhaps if you learned the basics of grammar and
punctuation, we wouldn't have this problem.

Your
knowledge of the population of cities is truly unbelievable are you
looking at 1810 census?



All of the cities I mentioned have populations under 500,000,
according to the 2003 FBI crime statistics. Perhaps you can tell us
what mistake you think I made.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Its not clear what your point is here. Are you saying these are or
are not southern states?

From my Boston perspective, most of these cities are southern.
However, if you're claiming they are not, you should consider that
this is from a list of cities over 500,000, which excludes all
cities in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi,
and Louisiana.

Birmingham, Little Rock, Atlanta, Jackson, and Miami have higher
murder rates than Philadelphia.

New Orleans would lead the list, having a murder rate 20% worse than
Washington.


JR Gilbreath wrote:

In 2002 the Leading cities for murders were; Washington DC,
Detroit, Baltimore, Memphis, Chicago and Philadelphia all southern
cities?

Would someone please explain this to the incredibly thick yokel. I'm
not going to waste any more time with him.


Jeff Morris wrote:

So you were just imitating an illiterate idiot. Sure, that's what you
claim now.



JR Gilbreath wrote:

Sarcasm sure goes over your head. I suppose it because of where you
keep you head.


Jeff Morris wrote:

JR Gilbreath wrote:

Well duh! Of course I thought Detroit, Chicago and Philadelphia were
southen cities.




I don't know how you define "Southern." Detroit and Chicago are at
the same latitude as Boston. Detroit even borders Canada.

Get a life.




Get an education.

Also, if you get murdered you are just as dead in a city of 500,000+
as you are in one with 1,000 people.




So? I was only pointing out that your stat was only for large
cities, and there are many small cities in the South that have the
same high murder rate. Perhaps if you learned the basics of grammar
and punctuation, we wouldn't have this problem.

Your
knowledge of the population of cities is truly unbelievable are you
looking at 1810 census?




All of the cities I mentioned have populations under 500,000,
according to the 2003 FBI crime statistics. Perhaps you can tell us
what mistake you think I made.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Its not clear what your point is here. Are you saying these are or
are not southern states?

From my Boston perspective, most of these cities are southern.
However, if you're claiming they are not, you should consider that
this is from a list of cities over 500,000, which excludes all
cities in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi,
and Louisiana.

Birmingham, Little Rock, Atlanta, Jackson, and Miami have higher
murder rates than Philadelphia.

New Orleans would lead the list, having a murder rate 20% worse than
Washington.


JR Gilbreath wrote:

In 2002 the Leading cities for murders were; Washington DC,
Detroit, Baltimore, Memphis, Chicago and Philadelphia all southern
cities?

What's that matter? Sarcasm lost on you?

Frankly, you seemed to be trying make a point, but your lack of
communication skills have made that impossible.



JR Gilbreath wrote:
Would someone please explain this to the incredibly thick yokel. I'm
not going to waste any more time with him.


Jeff Morris wrote:

So you were just imitating an illiterate idiot. Sure, that's what you
claim now.



JR Gilbreath wrote:

Sarcasm sure goes over your head. I suppose it because of where you
keep you head.


Jeff Morris wrote:

JR Gilbreath wrote:

Well duh! Of course I thought Detroit, Chicago and Philadelphia were
southen cities.





I don't know how you define "Southern." Detroit and Chicago are at
the same latitude as Boston. Detroit even borders Canada.

Get a life.





Get an education.

Also, if you get murdered you are just as dead in a city of
500,000+ as you are in one with 1,000 people.





So? I was only pointing out that your stat was only for large
cities, and there are many small cities in the South that have the
same high murder rate. Perhaps if you learned the basics of grammar
and punctuation, we wouldn't have this problem.

Your
knowledge of the population of cities is truly unbelievable are you
looking at 1810 census?





All of the cities I mentioned have populations under 500,000,
according to the 2003 FBI crime statistics. Perhaps you can tell us
what mistake you think I made.






Jeff Morris wrote:

Its not clear what your point is here. Are you saying these are
or are not southern states?

From my Boston perspective, most of these cities are southern.
However, if you're claiming they are not, you should consider that
this is from a list of cities over 500,000, which excludes all
cities in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi,
and Louisiana.

Birmingham, Little Rock, Atlanta, Jackson, and Miami have higher
murder rates than Philadelphia.

New Orleans would lead the list, having a murder rate 20% worse than
Washington.


JR Gilbreath wrote:

In 2002 the Leading cities for murders were; Washington DC,
Detroit, Baltimore, Memphis, Chicago and Philadelphia all
southern cities?