On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia
wrote:

On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal
(paraphrased):

Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA.
_______

Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who
cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to
redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy.

Just another example of my contradictory nature.

Doesn't apply to me, Jack.

What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of
SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I
infer from the initial statement above.

On Feb 6, 3:34 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia

wrote:
On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal
(paraphrased):

Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA.
_______

Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who
cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to
redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy.

Just another example of my contradictory nature.

Doesn't apply to me, Jack.

What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of
SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I
infer from the initial statement above.

Curious why you chose to respond to my statement in *this* thread,
where it's completely non-sequitur, rather in the *original* thread?

On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:39:16 -0800 (PST), marcia
wrote:

On Feb 6, 3:34 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia

wrote:
On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal
(paraphrased):

Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA.
_______

Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who
cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to
redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy.

Just another example of my contradictory nature.

Doesn't apply to me, Jack.

What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of
SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I
infer from the initial statement above.

Curious why you chose to respond to my statement in *this* thread,
where it's completely non-sequitur, rather in the *original* thread?

Couldn't find it.

But I remember the smarmy statement and meant to respond but forgot.