Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: Bzzzzt. The tanker will not hit a bridge piling to avoid the collision. Bzzzzt. The tanker will not be damanged. Bzzzzt. The tanker will not leave the channel. Bill... who has stand-on status on the ocean? Suggestion (not a hint): Stay away from tankers. Bzzt. A tanker hit the San Raphael bridge earlier this year avoiding a boat. The boat is and has been held liable. Look at the SFCG site, and you will probably find the info. Bzzt. A freighter ran aground somewhere back east avoiding a boat earlier this year. You will have to google up that one. Sure thing. I could be wrong. And, now, back to you to answer the many questions you have chosen to avoid answering..... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article et, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: Bzzzzt. The tanker will not hit a bridge piling to avoid the collision. Bzzzzt. The tanker will not be damanged. Bzzzzt. The tanker will not leave the channel. Bill... who has stand-on status on the ocean? Suggestion (not a hint): Stay away from tankers. Bzzt. A tanker hit the San Raphael bridge earlier this year avoiding a boat. The boat is and has been held liable. Look at the SFCG site, and you will probably find the info. Bzzt. A freighter ran aground somewhere back east avoiding a boat earlier this year. You will have to google up that one. Sure thing. I could be wrong. And, now, back to you to answer the many questions you have chosen to avoid answering..... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com You are always wrong. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: You are always wrong. If I agree, does that still work? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article et, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: You are always wrong. If I agree, does that still work? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Depends on the question. Another question for you. Power boat is going along at 10 knots passing a sailboat. Sailboat takes a 90 degree tack into the side of the powerboat. Who is at fault? |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... Depends on the question. Another question for you. Power boat is going along at 10 knots passing a sailboat. Sailboat takes a 90 degree tack into the side of the powerboat. Who is at fault? Well, let's see how this works. You're close enough to for it to be able to tack into the side of your boat. What would the maritime arbitration panel say if it went to them? If you don't know what I'm talking about, google it. John Cairns |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
ink.net... "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article et, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: You are always wrong. If I agree, does that still work? Not too bright are you? Depends on the question. Another question for you. Power boat is going along at 10 knots passing a sailboat. Sailboat takes a 90 degree tack into the side of the powerboat. Who is at fault? Please don't switch from MPH to KTS. It's just too confusing! Answer: PWCs are always at fault. They can't help it, they were built that way. Oh, you want a serious answer.. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. JG" wrote in
: Answer: PWCs are always at fault. They can't help it, they were built that way. I know someone who was passing a powerboat in a big PWC. The powerboat idiot didn't look behind him to see who was passing him and turned to port, into the PWC who ended up crashing into the port side of the powerboat. The PWC rider successfully sued for a new ski, medical costs, lost wages, etc., etc., after the DNR quoted the rules-of-the-road about maintaining course and speed when being overtaken someone else posted here. DNR investigated the accident and was not amused when the big powerboat rich boy pointed out "It's just a PWC", as you hotheads infer. The hotheaded attitudes displayed in this stupid thread over the hated PWC is a mixture for disaster on the waterways. The PWC riders have just as much rights to use the public's waterways as the millionaires in the Azimuts. Just ask the PWCer's attorney....(c; Someone said he drooled over this case when he found out how much money the powerboater was worth...(c; By the way, in SC, that PWC only needs be 50 ft away from your boat to run full throttle past you....50 ft....Says so right in the boating manual. Run over his little PWC. Make his day..... -- Larry, 3rd Mate S/V "Lionheart" |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Larry" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote in : Answer: PWCs are always at fault. They can't help it, they were built that way. I know someone who was passing a powerboat in a big PWC. The powerboat idiot didn't look behind him to see who was passing him and turned to port, into the PWC who ended up crashing into the port side of the powerboat. The PWC rider successfully sued for a new ski, medical costs, lost wages, etc., etc., after the DNR quoted the rules-of-the-road about maintaining course and speed when being overtaken someone else posted here. DNR investigated the accident and was not amused when the big powerboat rich boy pointed out "It's just a PWC", as you hotheads infer. The hotheaded attitudes displayed in this stupid thread over the hated PWC is a mixture for disaster on the waterways. The PWC riders have just as much rights to use the public's waterways as the millionaires in the Azimuts. Just ask the PWCer's attorney....(c; Someone said he drooled over this case when he found out how much money the powerboater was worth...(c; By the way, in SC, that PWC only needs be 50 ft away from your boat to run full throttle past you....50 ft....Says so right in the boating manual. Run over his little PWC. Make his day..... -- Larry, 3rd Mate S/V "Lionheart" Larry, if you or anyone else really thought I was serious, then you have more problems that can be solved here. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill McKee wrote:
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article et, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: You are always wrong. If I agree, does that still work? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Depends on the question. Another question for you. Power boat is going along at 10 knots passing a sailboat. Sailboat takes a 90 degree tack into the side of the powerboat. Who is at fault? Sailboat. Should have done a shoulder check first. Easy, bring'em on! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Jet Ski overheating problem | General | |||
Sea Ray Sundancer 250 DA Bilge problem | General | |||
battery isolator problem! | Electronics |