Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No, you should have no marine toilet whatsoever in order to protect the
environment. You should just hold it until you get back, or better yet,
don't boat in "our swimming pool" as you put it.

--


Keith
__
A husband is what is left of a man after the nerve is extracted.
"Paolo Zini" wrote in message
...

I am building a cat and I was planning to install a Lavac head (manual, no
power requirements...) with tank.
But msd+tank appears interesting...
It is expensive and needs space, but in case of failure of msd the tank
can
save the day.

Paolo





  #12   Report Post  
rhys
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:47:28 GMT, "Keith"
wrote:

No, you should have no marine toilet whatsoever in order to protect the
environment. You should just hold it until you get back, or better yet,
don't boat in "our swimming pool" as you put it.


I believe Paolo's concerns are valid and his queries sincere. While it
may be counter-productive to be obsessive on these topics, I believe
that it is helpful that we as sailors consider clearly our options in
regards to waste disposal and power management.

Part of the attraction to sailing as a lifestyle is that it is
relatively easy on the environment, as opposed to, say, driving a
Hummer to Mexico. The continuing interest in marine heads, composting,
windvane and wind turbines, solar panels, electric and/or fuel cell
diesel replacements, and so on reflects a concern not only for energy
"independence" to extend cruising, but also a desire to "sail lightly
upon the earth (or sea, I suppose)".

If forums like this can educate or elaborate on the options available,
all to the good. Sarcasm, I find, is less helpful, unless it is
directed at trolls.

R.

  #13   Report Post  
Terry Spragg
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Keith wrote:
Don't forget ducks, seagulls, etc.
To add a little more confusion to the marine water pollution arguments, the

journal SCIENCE (29 Mar. 2002) reported on a study which tracked the

biological sources of fecal bacterial in Virginia watersheds. Only 15% of E.

coli bacteria had a human origin (i.e. septic runoff and boat discharge).
The

remainder came from other animal hosts, the largest contributor being

waterfowl with 32.5% of the total. Similar studies are being carried out in

California, Washington, and Oregon.



Whats next? Diapers for geese? What about whales and everything else in the
ocean? Who's gonna change them?


What is absolutely mind boggling is that there are people who worry
about that stuff. Anally fixated neurotic paranoia is as sick to the
mind as cholera is to the gut.

Get used to the idea that the top 3 feet of this entire planet is
covered in ****. It is what soil is. Fish ****, bird ****, mammal
**** are all good for you, essential ecological nutrients.

When you eat, what passes through is just not needed or used by your
G.I. tract, it is mainly inert, it is not inherently dangerous,
unless the "donor" is ill with a *pathological* bacterial
infestation, or worms or something. In which case, the afflicted
individual might know and in this day and age, should have emergency
public health assistance easily available, for the betterment of all
of the rest of us. That is what taxation and public health is
supposed to be all about. Public toilets are a big issue right now
in China, where the olympics are bound. Where does a homeless person
go in Noo Yak?

Or is it better to chase the sickos out into the countryside, so
they can die discreetly and fester quietly in a ditch somewhere,
hopefully not too near where the peasants grow our food or draw our
water?

Perhaps some of America's tax slaved military might could be
usefully employed tracking larger sea animals and bombing their
fecal trails with DDT or something? They could contract to get rid
of this offensive chemical.

It is suggested you should take care to ensure that your servants,
close aquaintances and intimate friends are healthy in mind and
body. Beyond that, get over it.

Poo is good for you.

War is dirty, a stupid waste designed to enrich arms dealers alone.

Fuel is a weapon.

Terry K

  #14   Report Post  
Skip Gundlach
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi, Y'all,

Truncating this to a question or two:

"Peggie Hall" wrote in message
...
Any manual marine toilet that's working anywhere near factory specs can
move bowl contents at least 6' in the dry mode...so if you learn how to
flush your toilet correctly, there shouldn't be any water or waste in
the line between the toilet and top of the loop to run back down into
the bowl.


This has me very curious. You're saying that enough
speed/pressure/whatever-moves-it is developed, in an anti-siphon environment
(the vented loop), that I can clear a 1.5" line for what is (in the new
installation) about 3.5-4 feet (to the top of the loop) by dry flushing?

I buy that I might be able to flush solids, with water, that far, if I'm
aggressive enough with my volume (and the Raritans we have probably put in a
cup per stroke or so), but I don't see how that pipe can empty, dry pump or
not. I'd have to think the surface tension of the water would not be
sufficient to prevent the water running past the bubble at the edges, as you
recharge between strokes. I'd be thrilled to think I could really empty it,
as that - with a straight discharge - would go a long way to keep odor down
(should be only sea water to make odor, that way). Help me out with my
physics, here?


On the subject of joints, I'm of distinctly curious mind. While my

current
home isn't this way, my prior home had hundreds of feet of PVC pipe run,
with all the necessary ells, Ts and other fittings, all successfully
carrying high pressure hot and cold water.... Am I missing something?


What you're missing is: houses stay put...they don't get tossed around
by wind and wave. Boats do.


Well, yes, of course. But if I secure a large pipe, in a short run, under
next to no pressure, it's not going to move. In the house example, you
could see the distortion of the hot water pipe from expansion vs resting
state as hot water entered, and see it jump as the water was shut off and
turned on - but it all stayed together. In the boat, we'll use hose as
movement absorbers.

Not trying to be argumentative - just understand why I shouldn't be doing as
SeaLand recommends...

Peggie
----------
Peggie Hall
Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987
Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and
Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor"


By the way, I promoted your book to several people complaining of stinky
heads, and saw many of them being bought from the vendor table at the SSCA
Gam in Melbourne the first weekend in November...

L8R

Skip (and Lydia, by proxy)

--
Morgan 461 #2
SV Flying Pig
http://tinyurl.com/384p2

"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you
didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail
away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore.
Dream. Discover." - Mark Twain



  #15   Report Post  
Brian Whatcott
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:20:39 -0400, Terry Spragg
wrote:


When you eat, what passes through is just not needed or used by your
G.I. tract, it is mainly inert, it is not inherently dangerous,
unless the "donor" is ill with a *pathological* bacterial
infestation, or worms or something. In which case, the afflicted
individual might know and in this day and age, should have emergency
public health assistance easily available, for the betterment of all
of the rest of us.

///
Terry K



Hard to know where to start with this post.

The major component of human faeces is E Coli - that's an intestinal
bacterium.
If much of it gets into the upper digestive tract you are either in
trouble, or in deep trouble.

But I will leave it at that

Brian W


  #16   Report Post  
Peggie Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You aven't got my point: disregarding the legal point or even the chemical
pollution, the soap can be safe and not chemically polluttant (maybe...)
But you can guarantee that the oil (only to remain with your example...)
that the soap as removed is also safe and not polluttant?


No...soap or detergent is safe, and so is anything that goes down a sink
or shower drain. But there is no soap, detergent or other cleaning
product that can transform a pollutant--say, oil in a bilge--into an
environmentally friendly product. Which is why it's such a mystery to me
that boat owners are so concerned about organic matter in gray water or
treated toilet waste, but give no thought at all to what their bilge
pumps are discharging.

And even if it is safe, do you tink that a place full of soap bubbles and
oil and watermelon seeds floating around is nice place where to send the
boys to swim?


Don't confuse galley WATER with galley waste (garbage)--which is what
watermelon seeds are. As for any oils (cooking or body), they're
emulsified by detergents and soaps...and most of those are very low suds
these days. You're far more likely to see suds and bubbles around a boat
being washed than from any sink drains.

If you're really sincere about protecting the ocean environment,
concentrate your efforts on keeping oil and grease out of the bilges
instead of worrying about what goes down a drain.

--
Peggie
----------
Peggie Hall
Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987
Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and
Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor"
http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1
http://shop.sailboatowners.com/detai...=400&group=327

  #17   Report Post  
Peggie Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Skip Gundlach wrote:
This has me very curious. You're saying that enough
speed/pressure/whatever-moves-it is developed, in an anti-siphon environment
(the vented loop), that I can clear a 1.5" line for what is (in the new
installation) about 3.5-4 feet (to the top of the loop) by dry flushing?


Yes, Skip...that's what I'm saying. A siphon break (vented loop) has no
impact on water being pushed through it...it only allows air into the
line to break the flow of water being pulled through it.


I buy that I might be able to flush solids, with water, that far, if I'm
aggressive enough with my volume (and the Raritans we have probably put in a
cup per stroke or so), but I don't see how that pipe can empty, dry pump or
not.


You can prove it to yourself by simply seeing what happens when you
flush the toilet in the dry mode.

--
Peggie
----------
Peggie Hall
Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987
Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and
Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor"
http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1

  #18   Report Post  
Paolo Zini
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Apparently my arguments have stirred up the group intollerance.
If you agree I would restart the MSD discussion in a different thread and
reformulate it.
I am really interested...

You aven't got my point: disregarding the legal point or even the

chemical
pollution, the soap can be safe and not chemically polluttant (maybe...)
But you can guarantee that the oil (only to remain with your example...)
that the soap as removed is also safe and not polluttant?


No...soap or detergent is safe, and so is anything that goes down a sink
or shower drain. But there is no soap, detergent or other cleaning
product that can transform a pollutant--say, oil in a bilge--into an
environmentally friendly product. Which is why it's such a mystery to me
that boat owners are so concerned about organic matter in gray water or
treated toilet waste, but give no thought at all to what their bilge
pumps are discharging.


I am interested only in small sailboat, i am building one 26' catamaran.
The only oil that you can extract from my bilge will be olive oil... :-)

And even if it is safe, do you tink that a place full of soap bubbles

and
oil and watermelon seeds floating around is nice place where to send the
boys to swim?


Don't confuse galley WATER with galley waste (garbage)--which is what
watermelon seeds are. As for any oils (cooking or body), they're
emulsified by detergents and soaps...and most of those are very low suds
these days. You're far more likely to see suds and bubbles around a boat
being washed than from any sink drains.


I have trouble with the language, I don't explain clearly my mind.
The watermellon seed is only one example of what can transform a clean
peacefull place into something unpleasant, disgusting...
I try with another example: if the bottom is mud, a small movement transform
the water from cristal clear to something dark and unpleasant... it is
safe, but I don't like it.
In the same way the boat discarge: head, galley, ad bilge water can be safe,
but doubtless aren't "cristal clear"...


If you're really sincere about protecting the ocean environment,
concentrate your efforts on keeping oil and grease out of the bilges
instead of worrying about what goes down a drain.


I agree: my engine is wind.
But sometimes the actions have a "flag" value: over my roof I have
photovoltaic panels, I do know that the energy balance (amount of energy
used to produce the cell/ amount of energy generated in the life) of
photovoltaic cells is largely debatable and my photovoltaic panels don't
change my country energy balance... But I have put my money there because I
want a greater attention to this type of problems.

Paolo




  #19   Report Post  
Everett
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So why doesn't Southern California allow Electra-San treated discharge??

Everett
Long Beach, CA

"Peggie Hall" wrote in message
...
Paolo Zini wrote:
...CUT...

removing it altogether...why store waste aboard if you can discharge it
legally AND with far less negative environmental impact than dumping a

tank?

just curious... Do you like to swim in your s**t?


Every sewage treatment plant in the world discharges into somebody's
waters...so it's just a matter of how well treated you want it to be.

And fwiw, the negative impact from just ONE dumped holding tank is greater
on the surrounding waters than that from 1000 boats, all using
Lectra/Sans, in the same waters for 24 hours.


--
Peggie
----------
Peggie Hall
Specializing in marine sanitation since 1987
Author "Get Rid of Boat Odors - A Guide To Marine Sanitation Systems and
Other Sources of Aggravation and Odor"
http://69.20.93.241/store/customer/p...40&cat=&page=1



  #20   Report Post  
Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Oops, sorry. It's illegal to discharge even olive oil...
http://www.epa.gov/oilspill/vegoil.htm

--


Keith
__
Don't let your mind wander -- it's too little to be let out alone.

"Paolo Zini" wrote in message
...


I am interested only in small sailboat, i am building one 26' catamaran.
The only oil that you can extract from my bilge will be olive oil... :-)



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Head trip - "Pipe down, you'se guys!" he said Archly Skip Gundlach Cruising 11 October 19th 04 01:34 AM
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 04:01 PM
Third Florida trip report (long, of course!) Skip Gundlach Cruising 18 December 29th 03 11:52 PM
Trip Report - Gentlemen's Trip 2003 Mike McCrea Touring 2 November 19th 03 12:23 PM
Life in Congo, Part V: What a (long) strange trip its being.... riverman General 47 September 25th 03 12:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017