"Richard" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 May 2008 07:14:44 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

http://www.informify.com/top-stories...-bullying-case

I wonder if this Wilbur sockpuppet who cyber bullied Jon with the Acid
trip BS and changing his web-site into a foul porn site will be
charged with cyber bullying?

Or will Jon have to kill himself first?

It's hard to squeeze water from a turnip, but Jon could sue and get
Wilburs 500 dollar crusty bottomed, bucket splashed, **** yellow
stained, broken boomed, derelict.

Fred

There are just a few problems:


bs deleted from another coward and liar

You are the problem.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On May 19, 12:45*pm, Dave wrote:

I sympathize with Jon, but we have far too many silly lawsuits today. Time
to get over the notion that every time your feelings are hurt you should run
to see a lawyer.

There is a big difference between feelings hurt, and trying to crush
one's source of income with an anonymous puppet.

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Fred

wrote in message
...

There is a big difference between feelings hurt, and trying to crush
one's source of income with an anonymous puppet.

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Good theory, can you prove it? And you still didn't answer my question, "Do
you have standing?"

--
Gregory Hall

Fred

wrote in message
...
On May 19, 12:45 pm, Dave wrote:

I sympathize with Jon, but we have far too many silly lawsuits today.
Time
to get over the notion that every time your feelings are hurt you should
run
to see a lawyer.

There is a big difference between feelings hurt, and trying to crush
one's source of income with an anonymous puppet.

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Fred


Really.. whatever, so my question is why do you care so much? You're the one
who started this thread... are you just another one of his many
"personalities?"

All you're doing is fueling his psychosis.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On May 21, 1:03*am, "Capt. JG" wrote:


All you're doing is fueling his psychosis.



Yes, I'm hoping his head will pop like a big zit full of puss.

Fred
--
"j" ganz

wrote in message
...
On May 21, 1:03 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:


All you're doing is fueling his psychosis.



Yes, I'm hoping his head will pop like a big zit full of puss.

Fred
--
"j" ganz


Thanks for nothing. Sounds like you have your own problems. It would be
nice, but unexpected if you would leave me out of it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 May 2008 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT), said:

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Nah. As I've pointed out, there really are no such risks if he limits
himself to the truth. He's just a natural asshole, and he thinks socks get
him a larger audience for his nonsense. But they're really pretty easy to
spot and killfile.

Consider him the group's court fool.

No, consider him doing that which was forced upon him. Due to continued
harassment of various past NSPs and ISPs having to deal with continued and
numerous bogus abuse complaints from various netKKKops like Jon and his ilk
who take offense at just about every written word, there comes a time when
taking steps to nullify said harassment is called for. Among these might be
NSP's who don't show an IP address and who reply to and ****can all
complaints after the first proven bogus attempt from any individual. (One,
after ascertaining very first bogus complaint, will forward said complaint
to user.) The standard reply goes something like this. "We don't release
any personal information about our customers regardless of your threats. If
you're serious send us a subpoena." In other words, put up or shut up!

Another reason might be using two or three different NSPs in case one
provider decides they're sick and tired of dealing with multiple abuse
complaints whether valid or not and closes the account. (This abuse
complaint flooding is a trick employed in the past by Katysails and Jon Boy
and a couple others.)

Another might be to have several NSP accounts to enable one to exercise
one's brain debating subjects of all sorts in groups abuse complaint
stalkers such as Jon Boy have no way to learn the whereabouts of. One must
adapt to stay one step ahead of any and all petty minds who make censorship
their life's work.

As Wilbur would say, "I hope this helps."

--
Gregory Hall

On May 19, 1:22*pm, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 19 May 2008 11:00:52 -0700 (PDT), said:

That is why Mr Neal shifted to a puppet to torment poor Jon. He
created an on-line sockpuppet to do his dirty work, work he felt was
to risky to do as himself.

Nah. As I've pointed out, there really are no such risks if he limits
himself to the truth. He's just a natural asshole, and he thinks socks get
him a larger audience for his nonsense. But they're really pretty easy to
spot and killfile.

Consider him the group's court fool.

Is it the truth when he convert Jon's sailing site into a porno site?
Looks, walks and sounds like constant harrasment to me.
Jon should sue Wilbur for lost wages.

Fred

wrote in message
...


Is it the truth when he convert Jon's sailing site into a porno site?

Can you prove that statement? If you'd do a little Googling you might just
find that particular pornolizer spoof has been on the web for years.

Anybody's site can be spoofed with it. Example:
http://www.pornolize.com/pornolize4?lang=en&url=http%3A%2F%2Fanncoulter.com &submit=TranslateLooks, walks and sounds like constant harrasment to me.And your opinion actually matters? Bwaaaahahahahahhahahahhahaha.Jon should sue Wilbur for lost wages.What, that allowance his mommy gives him? Pocket change!--Gregory Hall

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:20:51 -0100, Richard said:

There are just a few problems:

1. For years Ganz has provoked a number of individuals with libel and
fighting words.

Two problems with your post.

1. "He did it first" is not a defense to libel.

2. Truth is a complete defense to libel or slander. So the principal
issue is whether Neal's claims are true.

I sympathize with Jon, but we have far too many silly lawsuits today. Time
to get over the notion that every time your feelings are hurt you should
run
to see a lawyer.


Not sure what you're referring to with "but we have far too many silly
lawsuits...." He's not worth the trouble.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com