In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"

And, don't even get us started on the dreaded socialized
medicine. Gods
forbid we insure kids, whether they can afford it or not!
(Oh, sorry.)


And by ''we'', you mean?

Our corrupt society that thinks (and I use that term advisedly) $50B a month in Iraq is a better investment.

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"

And, don't even get us started on the dreaded
socialized
medicine. Gods
forbid we insure kids, whether they can afford it or
not!
(Oh, sorry.)


And by ''we'', you mean?

Our corrupt society that thinks (and I use that term
advisedly) $50B a month in Iraq is a better investment.


And by ''our corrupt society'', you mean the right?

In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"

And, don't even get us started on the dreaded
socialized
medicine. Gods
forbid we insure kids, whether they can afford it or
not!
(Oh, sorry.)


And by ''we'', you mean?

Our corrupt society that thinks (and I use that term
advisedly) $50B a month in Iraq is a better investment.


And by ''our corrupt society'', you mean the right?

Not at all. Why would you think that?

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article
,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"

And, don't even get us started on the dreaded
socialized
medicine. Gods
forbid we insure kids, whether they can afford it or
not!
(Oh, sorry.)


And by ''we'', you mean?

Our corrupt society that thinks (and I use that term
advisedly) $50B a month in Iraq is a better investment.


And by ''our corrupt society'', you mean the right?

Not at all. Why would you think that?


well then tell me, who exactly should be paying for these
kids' insurance.

In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article
,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"

And, don't even get us started on the dreaded
socialized
medicine. Gods
forbid we insure kids, whether they can afford it or
not!
(Oh, sorry.)


And by ''we'', you mean?

Our corrupt society that thinks (and I use that term
advisedly) $50B a month in Iraq is a better investment.


And by ''our corrupt society'', you mean the right?

Not at all. Why would you think that?


well then tell me, who exactly should be paying for these
kids' insurance.


Society as a whole. In the long run, it's less expensive, and it's certainly the morally correct thing to do. Why would a great society absolve itself of any responsibility for those who are in need.

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:33:45 -0000, lid (Jonathan
Ganz) wrote this crap:

well then tell me, who exactly should be paying for these
kids' insurance.


Society as a whole.

So you steal it from taxpayers. You ****en socialist.





I'm Horvath and I approve of this post.

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
In article
,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"

And, don't even get us started on the dreaded
socialized
medicine. Gods
forbid we insure kids, whether they can afford it or
not!
(Oh, sorry.)


And by ''we'', you mean?

Our corrupt society that thinks (and I use that term
advisedly) $50B a month in Iraq is a better investment.


And by ''our corrupt society'', you mean the right?

Not at all. Why would you think that?


well then tell me, who exactly should be paying for these
kids' insurance.


Society as a whole. In the long run, it's less expensive, and it's
certainly the morally correct thing to do. Why would a great society
absolve itself of any responsibility for those who are in need.

Why should I pay for anyone's kids, just because he couldn't keep his dick
in his pants?
Maybe you think that I should pay for your boat, too? Go **** yourself,

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...


And by ''we'', you mean?

Our corrupt society that thinks (and I use that term
advisedly) $50B a month in Iraq is a better
investment.


And by ''our corrupt society'', you mean the right?

Not at all. Why would you think that?


well then tell me, who exactly should be paying for these
kids' insurance.


Society as a whole. In the long run, it's less expensive,
and it's certainly the morally correct thing to do. Why
would a great society absolve itself of any responsibility
for those who are in need.


You think ''we'' , ''society as a whole'', should be
responsible for everyone's problems , like crack whore
babies and kids whose dad ran away and/or is too lazy to
work, etc.

Then, wouldn't you also believe that ''we'', ''society as a
whole'' are responsible for the whole worlds population,
including those poor souls in Iraq?

SBV

In article ,
Randy wrote:
Why should I pay for anyone's kids, just because he couldn't keep his dick
in his pants?
Maybe you think that I should pay for your boat, too? Go **** yourself,


Same to you sockpuppet... PLONK

In article ,
Scotty Same.as.above@com wrote:
You think ''we'' , ''society as a whole'', should be
responsible for everyone's problems , like crack whore
babies and kids whose dad ran away and/or is too lazy to
work, etc.

Then, wouldn't you also believe that ''we'', ''society as a
whole'' are responsible for the whole worlds population,
including those poor souls in Iraq?

As best as we are able, yes. Imagine... let freedom ring.