It's easy enough to say something stupid like that but ya gotta provide some proof. Not everybody's had the logic
circuits of their brains short-circuited by LSD.... Not everybody
believes crap like you, Capt. JG the illegal drug using braggart.

Cheers,
Ellen

Nobody will ever be able to prove conclusively that what we ar edoing to the
environment is causing climate changes and if there is a significant event we
will never be able to prove conclusively that it was our fault but we have a
lot of really good evidence that the pollutants we are putting into the air
are causing global changes. Even if the environmentalists are wrong about
global warming, is burning less fossil fuels, consuming less in general, and
putting less crap in our environment really a bad idea? Do we have to have
100% conclusive proof that what we are doing will cause global human
distruction before we decide not to live in filth? Everyone I have ever
heard that argues that we shouldn't do anything to stop/prevent global
warming always says that there is no conclusive proof so we should just keep
doing what we are doing and not think about it because some body might make
money off that change. A lot of evidence has shown that there is a shift in
global climate in the last 100 years. Even if that is a natural shift should
we still continue to burn massive amounts of fuel releasing chemicals such as
CO2 and particulate matter? I really don't think that it's a good idea. We
don't know what exactly will happen. Anyone that says we can not effect the
planet is either lying or retarded. Heres a quick test. Look up Google
earth at an aerial photo of the greater L.A. area or any oth major city in
the world and tell me what you see. I look and see thousands of acres of
concrete. It is a huge area that is paved over. That is a significant
change and is just one of many changes people have made on this planet.

Bill

--
Message posted via BoatKB.com
http://www.boatkb.com/Uwe/Forums.asp...iling/200702/1