LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Capt. Neal®
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scout" wrote in message ...
So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity, were socialists?


Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public
educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding
fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength through
individualism and hard work.

Our founding fathers feared a strong central government and the socialism
and repression of individualism it represents. They worked hard at writing
guarantees of freedom and individuality into the Constitution but liberal
judges and lawyers have whittled away at the Constitution and passed so
many laws directly contrary to it (income tax for example) that is has
beed diluted and *******ized.

Or is unity a good thing only when some greedy ******* profits from it?
Scout


The term "greedy *******s profiting" is right out of MoveON.org. It tells
me that liberals have a problem with free enterprise so they renamed it
something that sounds un-American. They did this because they are either
too lazy or too stupid to understand free enterprise and how and why
it built the greatest country in the world. Funny how a good word like
'profit' is made to sound un-American by you liberals.

CN



"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ...
[snip]
You are for labor unions - their time has come and gone - and
being for labor unions is about as liberal as one can get. Labor
unions are socialistic by their very nature. Get a grip.




  #2   Report Post  
Joe
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
"Scout" wrote in message

...
So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity,

were socialists?

Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public
educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding
fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength

through
individualism and hard work.

Our founding fathers feared a strong central government and the

socialism
and repression of individualism it represents. They worked hard at

writing
guarantees of freedom and individuality into the Constitution but

liberal
judges and lawyers have whittled away at the Constitution and passed

so
many laws directly contrary to it (income tax for example) that is

has
beed diluted and *******ized.

Or is unity a good thing only when some greedy ******* profits from

it?
Scout


The term "greedy *******s profiting" is right out of MoveON.org. It

tells
me that liberals have a problem with free enterprise so they renamed

it
something that sounds un-American. They did this because they are

either
too lazy or too stupid to understand free enterprise and how and why
it built the greatest country in the world. Funny how a good word

like
'profit' is made to sound un-American by you liberals.

CN


BRAVO ! Well said Capt.

Joe







"Capt. Neal=AE" wrote in message

...
[snip]
You are for labor unions - their time has come and gone - and
being for labor unions is about as liberal as one can get. Labor
unions are socialistic by their very nature. Get a grip.




  #3   Report Post  
Capt. Neal®
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thank you, Joe. You, sir, are a great American!

CN


"Joe" wrote in message oups.com...


BRAVO ! Well said Capt.

Joe




  #4   Report Post  
Scout
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have
something to show for it.
Scout

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Capt. Neal® wrote:
"Scout" wrote in message

...
So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity,

were socialists?

Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public
educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding
fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength

through
individualism and hard work.

Our founding fathers feared a strong central government and the

socialism
and repression of individualism it represents. They worked hard at

writing
guarantees of freedom and individuality into the Constitution but

liberal
judges and lawyers have whittled away at the Constitution and passed

so
many laws directly contrary to it (income tax for example) that is

has
beed diluted and *******ized.

Or is unity a good thing only when some greedy ******* profits from

it?
Scout


The term "greedy *******s profiting" is right out of MoveON.org. It

tells
me that liberals have a problem with free enterprise so they renamed

it
something that sounds un-American. They did this because they are

either
too lazy or too stupid to understand free enterprise and how and why
it built the greatest country in the world. Funny how a good word

like
'profit' is made to sound un-American by you liberals.

CN


BRAVO ! Well said Capt.

Joe







"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message

...
[snip]
You are for labor unions - their time has come and gone - and
being for labor unions is about as liberal as one can get. Labor
unions are socialistic by their very nature. Get a grip.





  #5   Report Post  
Capt. Neal®
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scout" wrote in message ...
Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have
something to show for it.
Scout


Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.

If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show
for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

You have the choice to work hard for something or to work hard for
nothing. Because you choose to work hard for nothing, don't attempt
to make others give you a share of what they have worked hard for
something. If you don't like being a common laborer barely scraping
by with nothing to show for it then quit, educate yourself and get a
real job. It's that easy.

Please stop your whining about something you have complete control
over.

CN


  #6   Report Post  
Scout
 
Posts: n/a
Default

that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.



  #7   Report Post  
Capt. Neal®
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Being?

"Scout" wrote in message ...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of
it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility.




  #8   Report Post  
Bob Crantz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's obvious that you, Capt Neal, reign supreme as a Master Mariner over
this newsgroup. I took note of your quick detection of a sense of
entitlement from Scout there. That is one of the essential traits of
Liberalism. It is an attempt to thwart reality by assuming that something is
owed you (obviously from someone else).

If a liberal is alone in the woods and a tree falls and lands on his leg,
pinning him to the ground, is he entitled to help?

"Ask not what your country can force others to do for you".

Amen!

Bob Crantz

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

Being?

"Scout" wrote in message

...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that

everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of
it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it

that is his own choice and his own responsibility.





  #9   Report Post  
Scout
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.. . . that being comfortable with the few profiting from the hard work of
the many, while the many receive no profit, is to be comfortable with
slavery, which doesn't surprise me a bit.


"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

Being?

"Scout" wrote in message
...
that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.






  #10   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Scout wrote:
Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have
something to show for it.
Scout


Unions... the people who gave us the 8 hour days and the 5 day work
weeks.
--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
final kayak decision Chris Touring 0 August 27th 03 07:57 PM
How to qualify 120 boats for final Gold/Silver fleets Edward Mitchell General 3 August 1st 03 12:07 AM
unusual docking situation Scout ASA 12 July 21st 03 01:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017