Thank you, Joe. You, sir, are a great American!

CN


"Joe" wrote in message oups.com...


BRAVO ! Well said Capt.

Joe

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

"Scout" wrote in message
...
So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity, were
socialists?

Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public
educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding
fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength through
individualism and hard work.

Nope, Catholic school, then private college.
And, our founding fathers United the colonies, they made a UNION. Care to
guess why?
You lose, once again.
Scout

Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have
something to show for it.
Scout

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Capt. Neal® wrote:
"Scout" wrote in message
...
So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity,
were socialists?

Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public
educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding
fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength
through
individualism and hard work.

Our founding fathers feared a strong central government and the
socialism
and repression of individualism it represents. They worked hard at
writing
guarantees of freedom and individuality into the Constitution but
liberal
judges and lawyers have whittled away at the Constitution and passed
so
many laws directly contrary to it (income tax for example) that is
has
beed diluted and *******ized.

Or is unity a good thing only when some greedy ******* profits from
it?
Scout

The term "greedy *******s profiting" is right out of MoveON.org. It
tells
me that liberals have a problem with free enterprise so they renamed
it
something that sounds un-American. They did this because they are
either
too lazy or too stupid to understand free enterprise and how and why
it built the greatest country in the world. Funny how a good word
like
'profit' is made to sound un-American by you liberals.

CN

BRAVO ! Well said Capt.

Joe







"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
[snip]
You are for labor unions - their time has come and gone - and
being for labor unions is about as liberal as one can get. Labor
unions are socialistic by their very nature. Get a grip.

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...



"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:Ty3Yd.31182$fc4.3492@edtnps89...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" hurled the following insult:

You're acting like a Liberal!

Them's fightin' words, Bubba. Put up yer dukes!

Sorry but I don't fight with GIRLS!!!


Coulda fooled me. Isn't it you who answers almost every one
of Gaynz's posts?

Gaynz is a Queer..... slappin' queers is okay! You on the other hand
should be dressed in a skirt and have a make-over considering your recent
foray into arguing with hens about hens.

CM

Sorry, my liberal friend,

The founding fathers created a union of *states*.

They believed strongly in *states rights* and more strongly in *individual rights*
or inalienable rights as they were called in the Constitution. A war was even
fought over states rights but the federal government had become strong enough
to force its views on half a country by then and it was downhill from there.

It at that time that the federal govt. became stronger than the state governments.

I suggest you refresh your lagging understanding of our founding
fathers by reading the following:
http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/...s/jeff0100.htm

In it you will read things like this:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal;
that they are endowed by their Creator with inherent and inalienable
rights; that among these, are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;
that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that
whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends,
it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new
government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing
its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect
their safety and happiness." --Declaration of Independence as
originally written by Thomas Jefferson, 1776. ME 1:29, Papers 1:315

Today's federal government has clearly become destructive to these
ends and our inalienable rights are clearly being denied. Our govt. is
ordained by our Constitution to secure and protect our rights. They
are clearly doing just the opposite in many areas of our lives. Our government
is forceable taking away close to half of the fruits of our labor and using them
for itself and is giving away a large portion of them to every Tom, Dick
and Harry who sticks out his hand. This is NOT what the founding fathers
wanted.

I hope this helps.

CN

"Scout" wrote in message ...
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ...

"Scout" wrote in message ...
So our founding fathers, who believed in strength through unity, were socialists?

Bwaahahhahahahhah. You are definitely a product of the liberal public
educational system. You learned a slanted view of what our founding
fathers were all about. Our founding fathers believed in strength through
individualism and hard work.

Nope, Catholic school, then private college.
And, our founding fathers United the colonies, they made a UNION. Care to guess why?
You lose, once again.
Scout

"Scout" wrote in message ...
Nothing wrong with profit Joe. But everyone who works hard should have
something to show for it.
Scout

Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.

If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show
for it that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

You have the choice to work hard for something or to work hard for
nothing. Because you choose to work hard for nothing, don't attempt
to make others give you a share of what they have worked hard for
something. If you don't like being a common laborer barely scraping
by with nothing to show for it then quit, educate yourself and get a
real job. It's that easy.

Please stop your whining about something you have complete control
over.

CN

Yes, they formed a UNION. Are you really ignoring the word or just
pretending to ignore it?
And why did they unionize? To stand together against tyranny is why! Pure
and Simple.

I believe it was a Republican who said, "I do not expect the Union to be
dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will
cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other."
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
Sorry, my liberal friend,
The founding fathers created a union of *states*.
[snip]

that's just perversion of a more noble idea.
Scout

"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Wrong! That is pure liberalism. You need to consider the fact that
everyone who works hard, works hard. That's it. That's all of it.
If he has something to show for his hard work or nothing to show for it
that is his own choice and his own responsibility.

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:JR6Yd.18949$i6.18566@edtnps90...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ...



"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:Ty3Yd.31182$fc4.3492@edtnps89...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ...

"Capt. Mooron" hurled the following insult:

You're acting like a Liberal!

Them's fightin' words, Bubba. Put up yer dukes!

Sorry but I don't fight with GIRLS!!!


Coulda fooled me. Isn't it you who answers almost every one
of Gaynz's posts?

Gaynz is a Queer..... slappin' queers is okay! You on the other hand should be dressed in a skirt and have a make-over
considering your recent foray into arguing with hens about hens.

CM


It has always been my belief that those who delight in beating up
queers are little chicken-**** men. Real men don't beat up queers.
Frightened little cowards do.

Do you agree that real men protect their women from abuse? Or
are one of those men who abuse their women?

CN

Duh! A labor union and a union of states is about as different
as an elementary school and a school of fish.

I am not ignoring the word *union* but you are making generalizations
that are as meaningless as the above comparison.

CN


"Scout" wrote in message ...
Yes, they formed a UNION. Are you really ignoring the word or just
pretending to ignore it?
And why did they unionize? To stand together against tyranny is why! Pure
and Simple.

I believe it was a Republican who said, "I do not expect the Union to be
dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will
cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other."
Scout