snort...dream on....if your life was half as good as what lives inside your
head, you'd be in heaven...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
I decided it was best to not e-mail you with personal
correspondence. You would surely fall in love with me
and I you. Since you are married that would be
unacceptable behavior on both our behalves.

Being a man of high morals and Godly upbringing,
I am willing to sacrifice some immediate gratification
for the good of you, your husband and your children.

I could never live with myself knowing I had broken
up a healthy marriage from a selfish desire to
correspond with a very delicious and highly intelligent
woman even if she's one who doesn't eat right.

LP, on the other hand, has no such encumbrances
so she can correspond freely with single men. Not
only that but she is just as beautiful as you and
has the prettiest blue eyes. . . And Mooron said
she's a natural blonde - sort of strawberryish.

Yum!

Try not to be too jealous of her, please.

CN


"katysails" wrote in message
...
No....that's not what I meant. I meant we do not correspond off the ng
(except that he does send me Christmas cards....)

"Lady Pilot" wrote in message
news:wiQtd.89462$EZ.13120@okepread07...
So you are claiming that Neal is an imposter on the newsgroups for the
past few years?

Shock,
LP

"katysails" wrote in message
...
Check with me about what? Neaal's not one of my correspondants.

"Lady Pilot" wrote in message
newsNNtd.89289$EZ.62758@okepread07...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote:

Was I supposed to e-mail or call?

I don't have your e-mail or your phone #.

You could send me a message at
warrenneal at hotmail dot com. Maybe
it will get through. Sometimes hotmail
is a bit overaggressive tossing mail into
the junk mail file.

CN

Well, I've never had your hotmail account, (maybe I should check with
Katy?) although I did post my ladypilot at geocities dot com addy,
but
you never responded...

LP

Go for it....we're all waiting with baited breath...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
Jealousy rearing it's ugly head? Katy, I'm shocked.

The real Capt. Neal just might be willing to turn over
a new leaf for the right woman . . .

CN




"katysails" wrote in message
...
My warnings? Do an archive search on this group about 5-7 years
back....you
only know the kinder, gentler Neal....but the real Neal is lurking just
under the skin....

Crap'n Neal® wrote:
I would probably shoot the scum in the spine right below
his head so he would have the rest of his life in a wheel
chair as a quad to think about the error of his ways.


No, you'd probably catch your thumb in the hammer or shoot yourself in
the foot.

Nav wrote:
And then you would spend a lot of time in prison to consider the error
of your ways

Maybe in New Zealand, but not here. In the U.S. we have civilized laws
regarding the defense of others from human predators.

In fact, in NC a couple years back a bill to update the law on use of
deadly force to protect property failed to pass. The legalese meant that
the law reverted to an older version which allows a property owner to
shoot trespassers. So when a tarheel says 'git outta my yard, boy' you
better git.

DSK

katysails wrote:
gee...we're only allowed to shoot trespassing dogs...maybe we should move to
NC...

You'd miss all the snow, wouldn't you? We haven't even had a freeze here
yet.

Actually I believe it's a fairly universal principle in most states,
that one may (or even should) use deadly force to prevent the commission
of a fatal crime. Hey Dave, if you're reading this thread, any comment
on this?

I know it's true in Florida, years ago a co-worker shot a robber in a
convenience store who was holding a gun to the clerk's head. The cops
showed up at the shop, took his statement, and left. He was never
charged with anything.

As for trespassing, some states have recently (in the past 20 years
AFAIK) passed laws mandating "maximum retreat" meaning that you cannot
use force to defend your property. Sounds pretty stupid to me, it's not
a big problem for society that gung-ho home-owners are shooting crooks
in record numbers. Maybe the crooks have a better lobby?

Regards
Doug King

Miss snow? Yeah...right....I can live without it...
As far as shooting people goes, in Michigan, if someone breaks in to your
house you have the option of shooting him dead or not shooting him at
all...if you shoot and wound they can sue you for everything you;ve
got...also, they have to die in the house..if they crawl out and die on the
sidewalk, you are then a murderer rather than shooting in self-defense...


"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
katysails wrote:
gee...we're only allowed to shoot trespassing dogs...maybe we should move
to NC...

You'd miss all the snow, wouldn't you? We haven't even had a freeze here
yet.

Actually I believe it's a fairly universal principle in most states, that
one may (or even should) use deadly force to prevent the commission of a
fatal crime. Hey Dave, if you're reading this thread, any comment on this?

I know it's true in Florida, years ago a co-worker shot a robber in a
convenience store who was holding a gun to the clerk's head. The cops
showed up at the shop, took his statement, and left. He was never charged
with anything.

As for trespassing, some states have recently (in the past 20 years AFAIK)
passed laws mandating "maximum retreat" meaning that you cannot use force
to defend your property. Sounds pretty stupid to me, it's not a big
problem for society that gung-ho home-owners are shooting crooks in record
numbers. Maybe the crooks have a better lobby?

Regards
Doug King

You been eating squid again???

Seahag

"katysails" wrote:
Go for it....we're all waiting with baited breath...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
Jealousy rearing it's ugly head? Katy, I'm shocked.

The real Capt. Neal just might be willing to turn over
a new leaf for the right woman . . .

CN




"katysails" wrote in message
...
My warnings? Do an archive search on this group about 5-7 years
back....you
only know the kinder, gentler Neal....but the real Neal is lurking just
under the skin....

katysails wrote:
Miss snow? Yeah...right....I can live without it...

Same here.

As far as shooting people goes, in Michigan, if someone breaks in to your
house you have the option of shooting him dead or not shooting him at
all...if you shoot and wound they can sue you for everything you;ve
got...also, they have to die in the house..if they crawl out and die on the
sidewalk, you are then a murderer rather than shooting in self-defense...

I've heard that in many states if you shoot somebody in your yard, drag
them into the house and you're OK.

As for being sued by a robber... I know it's happened, which is
ridiculous... but IMHO it's not so much a problem with the laws as with
the fact that there are far too many lawyers with nothing better to do.
A friend of mine was once sued by a man who drove his car into the side
of my friends house. I don't know how the lawyers tried to convince a
court that my friend was driving his house recklessly....

DSK

In PA you can shoot a lawyer and don't have to drag him into your
house. Nobody wants a lawyer in their house, dead or alive.

Scotty

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
katysails wrote:
Miss snow? Yeah...right....I can live without it...

Same here.

As far as shooting people goes, in Michigan, if someone breaks in
to your
house you have the option of shooting him dead or not shooting him
at
all...if you shoot and wound they can sue you for everything
you;ve
got...also, they have to die in the house..if they crawl out and
die on the
sidewalk, you are then a murderer rather than shooting in
self-defense...

I've heard that in many states if you shoot somebody in your yard,
drag
them into the house and you're OK.

As for being sued by a robber... I know it's happened, which is
ridiculous... but IMHO it's not so much a problem with the laws as
with
the fact that there are far too many lawyers with nothing better to
do.
A friend of mine was once sued by a man who drove his car into the
side
of my friends house. I don't know how the lawyers tried to convince
a
court that my friend was driving his house recklessly....

DSK

Scott Vernon wrote:
In PA you can shoot a lawyer and don't have to drag him into your
house. Nobody wants a lawyer in their house, dead or alive.

That sounds like a good rule.

What do you do if you're trapped in a locked room with a revolver loaded
with only 2 bullets, an alligator, a rabid pit bull, and a lawyer?

You shoot the lawyer twice.

DSK

eewww..no...squid ain't my thing....had a nice mahi mahi the other day,
though...

"Seahag" wrote in message
...
You been eating squid again???

Seahag

"katysails" wrote:
Go for it....we're all waiting with baited breath...

"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
Jealousy rearing it's ugly head? Katy, I'm shocked.

The real Capt. Neal just might be willing to turn over
a new leaf for the right woman . . .

CN




"katysails" wrote in message
...
My warnings? Do an archive search on this group about 5-7 years
back....you
only know the kinder, gentler Neal....but the real Neal is lurking just
under the skin....