technology exists?
name it.
gf

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
if you are referring to the Hudson River PCB issue: there are arguably
very
real reasons for not disturbing the material at the bottom of the
river.


Good lord!!! The ole' "lets not stir up the bottom" issue direct from GE's
own
team!!! The truth is that technology exists to remove the spill, but it's
horribly expensive for the company. I guess they should have to do it
then,
right?

RB

congratulations!
and you have demonstrated she has not done very much, with the excuse being
she is a jr. senator and not in office for very long.
if that logic is valid, then it follows that bush has only been pres. for 4
years

Right, cuz a Jr. Senator is the same level of power as a president!!!
Smart!

RB

and we should not old him accountable for lack
of accomplishements.
but we wouldn't do that now would we.


Bush gets all the credit for the damage to the environment, the deficit and a
phoney war.

RB

technology exists?
name it.

No problem. I've answered each of your questions, and all you do is quickly
change the question.
Standard removal of layered PCB's involved dredging. Open water dredging and
dumping if actually used to relocat pollutants in some cases. It isn't possible
in this case of course. Vaccum type systems are costly, but greatly limit
sediment damage. Treatment of the materials is also possible. GE's claim that
it will creat a PCB "cloud" is actually true, but the duration of the cloud is
not serious enough to have any impact comperable to leaving the PCBs in place.
And sediment lifting is a minimal factor with new dredging technology.
Leaving it there forever is not the answer.

RB

that is correct.
i questioned what she has done.


And I gave you two very pleasant examples. You might also look at how her
support has aided Schumer's efforts. He certainly isn't complaining.
For a Jr. Senator she's pretty impressive. I don't think she should run for
president in four years. Not enough experience yet.

RB

no i did not say it does not count.
i said: it is what it is.

You said:

"on the positive side, she'll be out of NY, where she has not done a damn
thing of value."

Your statement has been corrected. That was the original debate and you lost it
as you were wrong.

RB

"gonefishiing" wrote in message ...
help us all
on the positive side, she'll be out of NY, where she has not done a damn
thing of value.
gf.

WRONG you will have to keep her.

John McCain will be our next president!
You heard it from me first!

McCain 2008
Joe

Joe wrote:
John McCain will be our next president!
You heard it from me first!

That would be much much better.


McCain 2008

Why wait? Unplug Cheney from his life support and move McCain into the
VP slot, then tell Bush Jr his turn is over.

DSK

In article ,
Joe wrote:
"gonefishiing" wrote in message ...
help us all
on the positive side, she'll be out of NY, where she has not done a damn
thing of value.
gf.

WRONG you will have to keep her.

John McCain will be our next president!
You heard it from me first!

I could live with that. I like McCain, but I doubt it'll happen.

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

yep about 270 plus worth of credit. While John Boy got credit for one
appearance before the Senate..like I said Paybacks are a . . . . .... .

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
and we should not old him accountable for lack
of accomplishements.
but we wouldn't do that now would we.


Bush gets all the credit for the damage to the environment, the deficit
and a
phoney war.

RB