I don't need to google... Bob had never sailed his latest vessel prior to
purchase. It had been laid up for 2+ years.

I believe he announced it as a Catalina first and then admitted it was a C&C
and that everyone on the group were gullible idiots for believing him and
congratulating him on the Catalina purchase. I also think he went on ad
nausea regarding found treasures aboard which he later admitted were also
fabrications.

We all remember the black mildew stains on the overhead panels. The C& C
Group wars....

....really, need I go on?

BTW.... I had never sailed a Nordica 30 prior to purchase of Overproof....
other than the "test sail" on the day of purchase. That was about a mile.

CM


"Scott Vernon" wrote in message| If you had the
time, and the will, you could easily Google and find
| that Bob**** is indeed lying, yet again.
|
| Scotty

I don't need to google... Bob had never sailed his latest vessel prior to
purchase. It had been laid up for 2+ years.


Wrong again, Mooron. I sailed a C&C 32 months before and drove quite a ways to
do it. Alien had been on the hard for 9 years and could not be test sailed.
Since I knew the owner and the fellow who'd cared for her, I had zero concerns.
As is quite aparent I made quite a killing. She has had no problems of any kind
after two seasons. Wasn't it YOU who claimed the engine wouldn't last? When
might I expect a failure? I only ask because it's running like new.
I also test sailed a C&C 33, which was also a contender.

RB

Don't go paranoid on me Bob....

Please read my post carefully for comprehension this time and pay particular
attention to "had never sailed his latest vessel prior to purchase"

I believe you just confirmed my recollection of events.

This of course leads to the conclusion that any further recollections of
this subject, on my part, be held believable.....


CM

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| I don't need to google... Bob had never sailed his latest vessel prior to
| purchase. It had been laid up for 2+ years.
|
|
| Wrong again, Mooron. I sailed a C&C 32 months before and drove quite a
ways to
| do it. Alien had been on the hard for 9 years and could not be test
sailed.
| Since I knew the owner and the fellow who'd cared for her, I had zero
concerns.
| As is quite aparent I made quite a killing. She has had no problems of any
kind
| after two seasons. Wasn't it YOU who claimed the engine wouldn't last?
When
| might I expect a failure? I only ask because it's running like new.
| I also test sailed a C&C 33, which was also a contender.
|
| RB

I believe he announced it as a Catalina first and then admitted it was a C&C
and that everyone on the group were gullible idiots for believing him and
congratulating him on the Catalina purchase.


Yup! Google it and you'll find quite a few folks writing "good one" and also
trying to calm a rabid Scotty Potti down!

RB

MORE LIES.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
I believe he announced it as a Catalina first and then admitted it
was a C&C
and that everyone on the group were gullible idiots for believing
him and
congratulating him on the Catalina purchase.


Yup! Google it and you'll find quite a few folks writing "good one"
and also
trying to calm a rabid Scotty Potti down!

RB

He said he brought a Catalina at the Atlantic City Boat Show.

A bold face lie of great proportions and I don't remember any comments
of approval other than from Nutsy himself, after he admitted his lie.

A bold face lie of great proportions and I don't remember any comments
of approval other than from Nutsy himself, after he admitted his lie.


Katy was among the people who nodded approval. Scotty went super nova.

RB

He said he brought a Catalina at the Atlantic City Boat Show.


No I didn't.

RB

I won't be surprised when he proudly boasts that this devil baby of
his is just another sick troll.

SV

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message
...
He said he brought a Catalina at the Atlantic City Boat Show.

A bold face lie of great proportions and I don't remember any
comments
of approval other than from Nutsy himself, after he admitted his
lie.

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
I won't be surprised when he proudly boasts that this devil baby of
his is just another sick troll.

The Troll probably ate a bad child and that is why he is sick......