JAXAshby wrote:
don't let the facts of science confuse you, over the knee. nevermind that
every last physicist on the planet is laughing at you.


Don't let the facts of navigation confuse you, jaxass. Never mind that
every last navigator on the planet is laughing at you.

ROFLMAO

otn

ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not give any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true, right?



don't let the facts of science confuse you, over the knee. nevermind that
every last physicist on the planet is laughing at you.


Don't let the facts of navigation confuse you, jaxass. Never mind that
every last navigator on the planet is laughing at you.

ROFLMAO

otn








don't let the facts of science confuse you, over the knee. nevermind that
every last physicist on the planet is laughing at you.


Don't let the facts of navigation confuse you, jaxass. Never mind that
every last navigator on the planet is laughing at you.

ROFLMAO

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not give any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true, right?

ROFLMAO

Ahhhh jaxass, you're always good for a laugh!!

You can't argue any point as to what "DR" is or might be, so you go off
running in circles yelling "physics, physics".
You know nothing about applying set and drift or how it may be
determined, so you claim "astrology,astrology".
You might be qualified to navigate in LI sound in daylight with
unlimited visibility within a mile of the beach, but never offshore, as
you've proven you can't even safely round Hatteras with a couple of GPS's.

BTW Yer right, I haven't crashed yet and I've been doin it fer about 45
years .....course, even idiots like you can do it nowadays .... as long
as you have enough spare gps receivers and batteries and don't lose the
signal for some reason..... then again, mebbe not.

Ahhhh well, enough jaxnonsense for this weekend.

otn

yeah, that's it. yesterday means tomorrow, green means frying pan and DR means
whatever you want, today at 7:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time when posting as what
the frick ever.


Date: 7/17/2004 7:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: et



JAXAshby wrote:
ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not give
any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true, right?

ROFLMAO

Ahhhh jaxass, you're always good for a laugh!!

You can't argue any point as to what "DR" is or might be, so you go off
running in circles yelling "physics, physics".
You know nothing about applying set and drift or how it may be
determined, so you claim "astrology,astrology".
You might be qualified to navigate in LI sound in daylight with
unlimited visibility within a mile of the beach, but never offshore, as
you've proven you can't even safely round Hatteras with a couple of GPS's.

BTW Yer right, I haven't crashed yet and I've been doin it fer about 45
years .....course, even idiots like you can do it nowadays .... as long
as you have enough spare gps receivers and batteries and don't lose the
signal for some reason..... then again, mebbe not.

Ahhhh well, enough jaxnonsense for this weekend.

otn

Does he know what DR stands for?

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
yeah, that's it. yesterday means tomorrow, green means frying pan and DR
means
whatever you want, today at 7:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time when posting as
what
the frick ever.


Date: 7/17/2004 7:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: et



JAXAshby wrote:
ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not
give
any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology
works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true,
right?

ROFLMAO

Ahhhh jaxass, you're always good for a laugh!!

You can't argue any point as to what "DR" is or might be, so you go off
running in circles yelling "physics, physics".
You know nothing about applying set and drift or how it may be
determined, so you claim "astrology,astrology".
You might be qualified to navigate in LI sound in daylight with
unlimited visibility within a mile of the beach, but never offshore, as
you've proven you can't even safely round Hatteras with a couple of
GPS's.

BTW Yer right, I haven't crashed yet and I've been doin it fer about 45
years .....course, even idiots like you can do it nowadays .... as long
as you have enough spare gps receivers and batteries and don't lose the
signal for some reason..... then again, mebbe not.

Ahhhh well, enough jaxnonsense for this weekend.

otn

Michael wrote:
Does he know what DR stands for?

Jax knows a basic definition of "DR" ..... or were you asking about me?

otn

No, not you. I just wondered if he knew what the letters stood for? I
missed the initial part of this and for whatever reason the provider won't
give them up when I sign on.

M.

"otnmbrd" wrote in message
nk.net...


Michael wrote:
Does he know what DR stands for?

Jax knows a basic definition of "DR" ..... or were you asking about me?

otn

Michael wrote:
Does he know what DR stands for?

... were you asking about me?

unless he is dumb, he was asking about you.


otn

over the knee obviously does not, so let's help out a bit.

Main Entry: de·duce
Pronunciation: di-'düs, dE-; chiefly British -'dyüs
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): de·duced; de·duc·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin deducere, literally, to lead away, from
de- + ducere to lead —more at TOW
Date: 15th century
1 : to determine by deduction; specifically : to infer from a general principle

synonym see INFER
- de·duc·ible /-'d(y)ü-s&-b&l/ adjective



Does he know what DR stands for?

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
yeah, that's it. yesterday means tomorrow, green means frying pan and DR
means
whatever you want, today at 7:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time when posting as
what
the frick ever.


Date: 7/17/2004 7:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: et



JAXAshby wrote:
ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not
give
any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology
works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true,
right?

ROFLMAO

Ahhhh jaxass, you're always good for a laugh!!

You can't argue any point as to what "DR" is or might be, so you go off
running in circles yelling "physics, physics".
You know nothing about applying set and drift or how it may be
determined, so you claim "astrology,astrology".
You might be qualified to navigate in LI sound in daylight with
unlimited visibility within a mile of the beach, but never offshore, as
you've proven you can't even safely round Hatteras with a couple of
GPS's.

BTW Yer right, I haven't crashed yet and I've been doin it fer about 45
years .....course, even idiots like you can do it nowadays .... as long
as you have enough spare gps receivers and batteries and don't lose the
signal for some reason..... then again, mebbe not.

Ahhhh well, enough jaxnonsense for this weekend.

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
over the knee obviously does not, so let's help out a bit.

Main Entry: de·duce
Pronunciation: di-'düs, dE-; chiefly British -'dyüs
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): de·duced; de·duc·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin deducere, literally, to lead away, from
de- + ducere to lead —more at TOW
Date: 15th century
1 : to determine by deduction; specifically : to infer from a general principle

synonym see INFER
- de·duc·ible /-'d(y)ü-s&-b&l/ adjective

You gotta make up your mind, jax. You were talking about "dead
reckoning" before, the term many use when employing time/direction/speed
only.
"deduced reckoning" applies when allowance is made for wind and current
..... something you say is impossible.
Mayhaps you should go back to the books for some further study.

otn