"Wally" wrote in message
...
Are you for real? Do you realise that there are people who don't believe
in
god, and for whom all the 'proof' that every believer tried to cite has
not
made them change their minds? The rocks and plants prove *nothing* about
the
existence of god.

Wally, take a minute to study your own thumb.

Ask yourself "How many genetic mutations were needed to make a working
thumb?".

How many generations did this small development take?

How old is the planet?



Regards


Donal
--

How many generations did this small development take?

How old is the planet?

More than old enough. I suggest you study an evolutionary time track
projection.

RB

More than old enough. I suggest you study an evolutionary time track
projection.


Evolution, if the theory is true, is direct evidence that God exists. However,
after studying its claims, I don't believe it. So much for that argument.

In your case, you've not evolved, so I can see your point.

"EdGordonRN" wrote in message
...
More than old enough. I suggest you study an evolutionary time track
projection.


Evolution, if the theory is true, is direct evidence that God exists.
However,
after studying its claims, I don't believe it. So much for that argument.

EdGordonRN wrote:

Evolution, if the theory is true, is direct evidence that God exists.

Please explain how this is so.


However, after studying its claims, I don't believe it. So much for
that argument.

After studying the claims of those who have faith, I don't believe that god
exists. So much for their arguments.


--
Wally
www.forthsailing.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk

Evolution, if the theory is true, is direct evidence that God exists.

And so goes the scary brainwashing power. If proof counters existence of god,
then "believers" warp it into some sort of proof to support their faith.
One day we'll learn that the bible was just part of a graphic novel and those
with faith will take a deep collective breath and exclaim, "You see!!!"
Amazing.

RB

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
Evolution, if the theory is true, is direct evidence that God exists.

And so goes the scary brainwashing power. If proof counters existence of
god,
then "believers" warp it into some sort of proof to support their faith.

You've already admitted that you used fiction to support your point of view.

You "imagined" an unfortunate 12y/o girl in your attempt to prove that God
sidn't exist.

Can't you see that if you need to resort to invention, your theory must be
very weak?

Regards


Donal
--

Can't you see that if you need to resort to invention, your theory must be
very weak?

Not all, seeing as my "invention" was a mix of real events and is quite common
otherwise.
"Pain and suffering" may not ultimately disprove the existance of god, but they
do show the level of job he/she's been doing. It's almost as if Bush were
god...!

RB

Donal wrote:

You "imagined" an unfortunate 12y/o girl in your attempt to prove
that God sidn't exist.

There is no onus on him to prove that god doesn't exist. In fact, he's
already declared that he's agnostic - why would he seek to substantiate a
proposition that he hasn't asserted? The claim that stands to be proven is
that goes does exist, and the onus is on the believers to prove their claim.


--
Wally
www.forthsailing.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk

fairy tail. Can't explain the thunder? No problem, it's Thor.

RB

Well... Donal is proof that Darwin wasn't completely correct.

Mutations can exist on a downward spiral, and like the Dodo, Donal is obviously
a failed mutation.

RB