Umm... sorry, but I think I need an interpreter... what does
"I'm suggestion that that is a total non-sequitur" mean?

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:06:33 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

It's compromised, but hasn't yet failed. I much rather have a cut than
fall in the water.

You'd probably prefer to be rich but happy rather than poor but unhappy
too.
(In case you missed it, I'm suggestion that that is a total non-sequitur)

Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

It's compromised, but hasn't yet failed. I much rather have a cut than
fall in the water.

The cut may lead your grip to fail...and splash anyway.

RB

The key word is "may."

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
It's compromised, but hasn't yet failed. I much rather have a cut than
fall in the water.

The cut may lead your grip to fail...and splash anyway.

RB

The key word is "may."


That will be the word at your funeral, Jonathan.
"If the line had been maintained, he MAY have survived."
I'm not sure what you're attempting to preach here. Suggesting that lifelines
are not key gear is something Neal would say. Or maybe not.

RB

You're the one maintaining that they're essential or key gear. They're not.
I don't have
any on my boat. Don't need them. They're nice to have. They're in the
category
of safety equipment. They, like most things, shouldn't be relied upon to
save your
life. One's brain is the most important and essential piece of equipment.
Don't get
onboard without it.

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
The key word is "may."


That will be the word at your funeral, Jonathan.
"If the line had been maintained, he MAY have survived."
I'm not sure what you're attempting to preach here. Suggesting that
lifelines
are not key gear is something Neal would say. Or maybe not.

RB

You're the one maintaining that they're essential or key gear. They're not.
I don't have
any on my boat.


Jonathan, don't you own a Cal 20? Few boats that small have life lines.

RB

jonny, it means you didn't understand the context of the sentence, therefore
the substitution of one letter for another and the elimination of a third
letter in a message of maybe ninety letters has left you completely baffled.

Umm... sorry, but I think I need an interpreter... what does
"I'm suggestion that that is a total non-sequitur" mean?

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:06:33 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
said:

It's compromised, but hasn't yet failed. I much rather have a cut than
fall in the water.

You'd probably prefer to be rich but happy rather than poor but unhappy
too.
(In case you missed it, I'm suggestion that that is a total non-sequitur)

Dave
S/V Good Fortune
CS27

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
jonny, it means you didn't understand the context of the sentence,
therefore
the substitution of one letter for another and the elimination of a third
letter in a message of maybe ninety letters has left you completely
baffled.



Rubbish!



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
jonny, it means you didn't understand the context of the sentence,
therefore
the substitution of one letter for another and the elimination of a
third
letter in a message of maybe ninety letters has left you completely
baffled.



Rubbish!


May be, but it's classic Jax.

donnie, you too, eh?

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
jonny, it means you didn't understand the context of the sentence,
therefore
the substitution of one letter for another and the elimination of a third
letter in a message of maybe ninety letters has left you completely
baffled.



Rubbish!



Regards


Donal
--