LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default That was no rock that Bobadil struck!

It is a good thing for the ferry boat operater that the
sailboater was drunk or it would have been the ferry
boat operator who was at fault for hitting a sailboat.

The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep
clear of a sailboat. I would like more information
on this collision because I suspect the sailboat was
motoring along on autopilot. The headline probably
should have read "Motorboats collide".


wrote in message ...
(watch the wrap)

http://www.ctnow.com/news/local/stat...nes-local-wire



  #2   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default That was no rock that Bobadil struck!

Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the
case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must
keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep
clear of a sailboat.

Can't the Ferry "claim" limited steerage in certain cases?

RB



  #3   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default That was no rock that Bobadil struck!

The sailboat is the stand-on vessel and is required
by the Rules to hold course and speed until and
unless it becomes apparent that the motor boat is
not taking the required action and a collision will
ensue unless the sailboats takes action to avoid the
collision. Then the sailboat can take such action
as it deems necessary to avoid the collision.


"Simple Simon" wrote in message ...
Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the
case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must
keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...
The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep
clear of a sailboat.

Can't the Ferry "claim" limited steerage in certain cases?

RB





  #4   Report Post  
otnmbrd
 
Posts: n/a
Default That was no rock that Bobadil struck!

Typically wrong response


Simple Simon wrote:

It is a good thing for the ferry boat operater that the
sailboater was drunk or it would have been the ferry
boat operator who was at fault for hitting a sailboat.

The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep
clear of a sailboat. I would like more information
on this collision because I suspect the sailboat was
motoring along on autopilot. The headline probably
should have read "Motorboats collide".


wrote in message ...

(watch the wrap)

http://www.ctnow.com/news/local/stat...nes-local-wire





  #5   Report Post  
otnmbrd
 
Posts: n/a
Default That was no rock that Bobadil struck!

Ain'tja forgetting somethin?

otn

Simple Simon wrote:

The sailboat is the stand-on vessel and is required
by the Rules to hold course and speed until and
unless it becomes apparent that the motor boat is
not taking the required action and a collision will
ensue unless the sailboats takes action to avoid the
collision. Then the sailboat can take such action
as it deems necessary to avoid the collision.


"Simple Simon" wrote in message ...

Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the
case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must
keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS.


"Bobsprit" wrote in message ...

The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep
clear of a sailboat.

Can't the Ferry "claim" limited steerage in certain cases?

RB








  #10   Report Post  
Simple Simon
 
Posts: n/a
Default That was no rock that Bobadil struck!

To those like you who have no imagination it is
not difficult to understand why you would say
something ignorant like Simon jumping the gun.

In a case like this there are more known facts
than you can imagine. Here are a few:

1) the newspaper got it wrong.
2) the newspaper is biased toward motor boats
3) the sailboat was probably motoring
4) the sailboat operator was probably not legally drunk.
5) the ferry was probably not operating in a narrow channel
5) the ferry was 'entering' the harbor which means it
was probably out of the marked channel already.
6) the sailboat was probably sailing around in the harbor
7) the ferry was probably in violation of the Rules
8) the sailboat was probably in violation of the Rules
9) the collision could have and should have been prevented
by the ferry giving way as required by the Rules.
10) I am correct more often than not.

S.Simon


"Shen44" wrote in message ...
Subject: That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
From: "Simple Simon"
Date: 08/04/2003 11:01 Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the
case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must
keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS.


Ole jump the gun Neal, strikes/screws up another response.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1960's Mariine Ply Commodre, Melbourne / Black rock / Morrington Peninsula Australia If Only Cruising 4 June 13th 04 11:46 PM
JPS hiding under a rock... Backyard Renegade General 22 January 1st 04 12:46 PM
The same people Simple Simon ASA 28 July 23rd 03 03:20 PM
struck by maniac last night, what to do moyo General 20 July 23rd 03 02:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017