Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
It is a good thing for the ferry boat operater that the
sailboater was drunk or it would have been the ferry boat operator who was at fault for hitting a sailboat. The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep clear of a sailboat. I would like more information on this collision because I suspect the sailboat was motoring along on autopilot. The headline probably should have read "Motorboats collide". wrote in message ... (watch the wrap) http://www.ctnow.com/news/local/stat...nes-local-wire |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the
case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS. "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep clear of a sailboat. Can't the Ferry "claim" limited steerage in certain cases? RB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
The sailboat is the stand-on vessel and is required
by the Rules to hold course and speed until and unless it becomes apparent that the motor boat is not taking the required action and a collision will ensue unless the sailboats takes action to avoid the collision. Then the sailboat can take such action as it deems necessary to avoid the collision. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS. "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep clear of a sailboat. Can't the Ferry "claim" limited steerage in certain cases? RB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
Typically wrong response
Simple Simon wrote: It is a good thing for the ferry boat operater that the sailboater was drunk or it would have been the ferry boat operator who was at fault for hitting a sailboat. The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep clear of a sailboat. I would like more information on this collision because I suspect the sailboat was motoring along on autopilot. The headline probably should have read "Motorboats collide". wrote in message ... (watch the wrap) http://www.ctnow.com/news/local/stat...nes-local-wire |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
Ain'tja forgetting somethin?
otn Simple Simon wrote: The sailboat is the stand-on vessel and is required by the Rules to hold course and speed until and unless it becomes apparent that the motor boat is not taking the required action and a collision will ensue unless the sailboats takes action to avoid the collision. Then the sailboat can take such action as it deems necessary to avoid the collision. "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS. "Bobsprit" wrote in message ... The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep clear of a sailboat. Can't the Ferry "claim" limited steerage in certain cases? RB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
Subject: That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
From: "Simple Simon" Date: 08/04/2003 10:49 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: It is a good thing for the ferry boat operater that the sailboater was drunk or it would have been the ferry boat operator who was at fault for hitting a sailboat. The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep clear of a sailboat. I would like more information on this collision because I suspect the sailboat was motoring along on autopilot. The headline probably should have read "Motorboats collide". Basing your response based on scanty information, aren't you Neal? Were they in open waters or in a channel? Shen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
Subject: That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
From: (Bobsprit) Date: 08/04/2003 10:51 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: The ferry is required by the COLREGS to keep clear of a sailboat. Can't the Ferry "claim" limited steerage in certain cases? RB Define "limited steerage" The closest thing that would apply, is if he was in a narrow channel and could expect (unless Neal was the operator) the sailboat , not to impede his passage ..... even then he's still bound by the rules. Need more info to tell how badly the sailboat messed up or if it would have been considered such if the operator was sober. Shen |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
Subject: That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
From: "Simple Simon" Date: 08/04/2003 11:01 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS. Ole jump the gun Neal, strikes/screws up another response. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
Subject: That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
From: "Simple Simon" Date: 08/04/2003 11:03 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: The sailboat is the stand-on vessel and is required by the Rules to hold course and speed until and unless it becomes apparent that the motor boat is not taking the required action and a collision will ensue unless the sailboats takes action to avoid the collision. Then the sailboat can take such action as it deems necessary to avoid the collision. trying to fill in some gaps, I see |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
That was no rock that Bobadil struck!
To those like you who have no imagination it is
not difficult to understand why you would say something ignorant like Simon jumping the gun. In a case like this there are more known facts than you can imagine. Here are a few: 1) the newspaper got it wrong. 2) the newspaper is biased toward motor boats 3) the sailboat was probably motoring 4) the sailboat operator was probably not legally drunk. 5) the ferry was probably not operating in a narrow channel 5) the ferry was 'entering' the harbor which means it was probably out of the marked channel already. 6) the sailboat was probably sailing around in the harbor 7) the ferry was probably in violation of the Rules 8) the sailboat was probably in violation of the Rules 9) the collision could have and should have been prevented by the ferry giving way as required by the Rules. 10) I am correct more often than not. S.Simon "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: That was no rock that Bobadil struck! From: "Simple Simon" Date: 08/04/2003 11:01 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Only if it is a cable ferry. In this case this was not the case. The ferry is nothing but a motor boat and must keep clear of a sailboat according to the COLREGS. Ole jump the gun Neal, strikes/screws up another response. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1960's Mariine Ply Commodre, Melbourne / Black rock / Morrington Peninsula Australia | Cruising | |||
JPS hiding under a rock... | General | |||
The same people | ASA | |||
struck by maniac last night, what to do | General |