Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.tall-ships,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message news:2007082522413516807-none@nowherecom... On 2007-08-24 17:33:32 -0700, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Wrong! the only thing that makes it a brigantine is the fact it carries a gaff mainsail. If it carries no gaff mainsail then it's a brig. Brig: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Washington Nope! Since she carries a gaff mainsail that makes her a brigantine. Brigs carry ONLY square sails on both masts. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.tall-ships,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilbur Hubbard wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message news:2007082522413516807-none@nowherecom... On 2007-08-24 17:33:32 -0700, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Wrong! the only thing that makes it a brigantine is the fact it carries a gaff mainsail. If it carries no gaff mainsail then it's a brig. Brig: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Washington Nope! Since she carries a gaff mainsail that makes her a brigantine. Brigs carry ONLY square sails on both masts. I don't believe this is true, and as you have failed to accede to my request for independent authoritaive corroboration of your mistaken interpretation, I conclude that you to take part in this discussion like a grown-up, and that I was wrong to give the benefit of the doubt, thinking that you might - for once - not be trolling. Your behaviour just doesn't cut the mustard. I should have listened to Martin! Goodbye. |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.tall-ships,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ronald Raygun" wrote in message k... Wilbur Hubbard wrote: "Dave" wrote in message news:2007082522413516807-none@nowherecom... On 2007-08-24 17:33:32 -0700, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Wrong! the only thing that makes it a brigantine is the fact it carries a gaff mainsail. If it carries no gaff mainsail then it's a brig. Brig: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Washington Nope! Since she carries a gaff mainsail that makes her a brigantine. Brigs carry ONLY square sails on both masts. I don't believe this is true, and as you have failed to accede to my request for independent authoritaive corroboration of your mistaken interpretation, I conclude that you to take part in this discussion like a grown-up, and that I was wrong to give the benefit of the doubt, thinking that you might - for once - not be trolling. Your behaviour just doesn't cut the mustard. I should have listened to Martin! Goodbye. I guess you didn't bother reading the post way up the thread where I linked to three different dictionary definitions that support my contentions. Or, perhaps you did and you've concluded you lost the argument so you're acting like you're giving up because I didn't argue your way or do further research for you. Well, whoop-de-doo. Good riddance to ya. There are none so blind as those who will not see. Wilbur Hubbard |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.tall-ships,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 26, 4:06 pm, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Ronald Raygun" wrote in message k... Wilbur Hubbard wrote: "Dave" wrote in message news:2007082522413516807-none@nowherecom... On 2007-08-24 17:33:32 -0700, "Wilbur Hubbard" said: Wrong! the only thing that makes it a brigantine is the fact it carries a gaff mainsail. If it carries no gaff mainsail then it's a brig. Brig: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Washington Nope! Since she carries a gaff mainsail that makes her a brigantine. Brigs carry ONLY square sails on both masts. I don't believe this is true, and as you have failed to accede to my request for independent authoritaive corroboration of your mistaken interpretation, I conclude that you to take part in this discussion like a grown-up, and that I was wrong to give the benefit of the doubt, thinking that you might - for once - not be trolling. Your behaviour just doesn't cut the mustard. I should have listened to Martin! Goodbye. I guess you didn't bother reading the post way up the thread where I linked to three different dictionary definitions that support my contentions. Or, perhaps you did and you've concluded you lost the argument so you're acting like you're giving up because I didn't argue your way or do further research for you. Well, whoop-de-doo. Good riddance to ya. There are none so blind as those who will not see. Wilbur Hubbard Wilbur the Chapman guide and the Annapolis guide to seamanship both say you are wrong. Plus a Spanker is not a mainsail. It's a brig even if it has a for-and-aft rigged sail as long as it is not the main. When I get home I will try to remember to get the exact verbiage. |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.tall-ships,uk.rec.sailing
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ronald Raygun" wrote in message k... Your behaviour just doesn't cut the mustard. I should have listened to Martin! Go ahead and listen to the netKKKop. Martin is a little whining snitch and a girly-man to boot. He never discussed anything in his life. He's set himself as group moderator. Typical behavior from an anal retentive loser. Wilbur Hubbard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tall ships | Tall Ships | |||
Tall Ships | General | |||
Not so tall ships | Tall Ships | |||
Tall Ships | General | |||
Tall Ships | ASA |