Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New York Ruling Posted
I understand that the sight is being overwhelmed with hits and is having
trouble keeping up with demand as this was posted to other racing sights also. If anyone that want's to see this and can't get on the sight please email me and I will email you the files as I have down loaded them. Matthew |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
New York Ruling Posted
First thing is to use your right to vote before it's gone.
Second - dissolve the SEA-TAC plan Third - put control back in the hands of the members. "Matthew Barrett" wrote in message ... The New York Judges ruling is now posted. I suggest all APBA members read the transcripts from the proceedings along with the ruling as it goes into great detail about the confusing nature of everthimg that has been going on in the organization. I the transcripts the judge recognizes themembership was not informed properly as to the nature of the changes that were to take effect and that as a membership organization the members need to be informed and involved in the running of the APBA. I also suggest all APBA members to attend the annual meeting scheduled for Feb 2004 in Milwaukee to voice your opinions and idea's for the future of APBA as a whole. Matthew Barrett "www.geocities.com/sponsonhead/index.html" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
New York Ruling Posted
I believe that the licensee's need a voice on the BOD but not one for each
license as with the other categories they elect one category chair to the BOD to represent all categories the same should be done for the licensee's, one board member to represent all the licensee's. This way it doesn't matter how many categories are licensed they will only have one vote equal to the remainder of the unlicensed categories. The other BOD members will be elected by the members as a whole. Matthew "Inigo Montoya" wrote in message ... "Matthew Barrett" wrote in message ... 1 item I think needs to be on the agenda is if a licensee is in default of their contract of which there are only 2 right now does that mean that we could have 1 licensee that has 3 board seats and might represent less than 20 members? Just my $ .02. Matthew Barrett My $.02 ? Licensees should have NO seats on the board of directors. When was the last time a vendor held a seat on a corporate board ??? If you owned a company, would you like your suppliers calling the shots ? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sailing schools in New York City area | Cruising | |||
OT : The New York Times - Fair and Balanced LOL | General | |||
OT - Where is the lie? (especially for jcs) | General |