On Oct 22, 2:19*pm, wrote:
On Oct 22, 1:54*pm, wrote:





On Oct 22, 1:17*pm, wrote:

On Oct 22, 12:25*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:

wrote in message

...
On Oct 22, 11:50 am, "Eisboch" wrote:

Here's something that will make you sick .....

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/money/index.html

Eisboch

Take big business out of the equation and those numbers fall a lot.
Make all contributions go directly to the candidates. *Eliminate
corporate contributions. *Require any contributions to other groups,
like the rnc and dnc, be limited in use to issue advertising only with
no mention of any candidates by name. *Then you are just left with
direct campaign funding coming from individuals that support the
candidate.

--------------------------------------

Are you suggesting that big business/corporations are supporting Obama over
McCain by more than 2 to 1?

Eisboch

No. *The general public is supporting Obama over McCain 2 to 1. *The
real Joe the plumbers. *Direct contributions to a candidate are
limited to $2,300.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah, that's why Obama won't release the lists of donors.. for all we
know, forigen governments might be supplying that cash like the
millions the Chinese military gave Clinton.. Which was of course
returned "after" the election...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Bush has borrowed more money from China that anyone ever before.
Therefore, we, as a country are severely indebted to them. Is that
okay with you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

3 million dollars was illegally donated to the Clinton campaign by the
Chinese Military, not the Chinese Govt, three weeks before the
election and used to flood the west coast with commercial time. The
money was returned after the election with an apology.. That is a lot
different than GW "borrowing" from the Chinese Govt with the approval
of the congress..