Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
Palin Disputed In Troopergate Probe Sept. 20, 2008(CBS/AP) Just when it seemed the Alaska investigation into Gov. Sarah Palin's firing of a state official might have been scuttled by the pressures of presidential politics, another turn of events has kept it going. Palin's firing of Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan last July, allegedly after pressure by her, her husband and staff members on Monegan to fire her ex-brother-in-law was ignored, is at the center of the investigation (known as Troopergate) into whether Palin abused her power. Palin originally agreed to participate in the investigation, authorized in July by the Republican-controlled legislature. She told Alaskans, "Hold me accountable." Once named to the McCain ticket, however, Palin backpedaled. She has since refused to testify. Palin has maintained that she fired Monegan not over the status of Trooper Mike Wooten, but over budget disagreements - specifically a trip Monegan planned to Washington which she said was unauthorized. Earlier this week the McCain campaign released a series of e-mails detailing the frustration several Palin administration officials experienced in dealing with Monegan. The "last straw," the campaign said, was a trip Monegan planned in July to seek federal money for investigating and prosecuting sexual assault cases. Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing. However, Palin's chief of staff did authorize the travel to Washington. A travel authorization document signed by Palin's Chief of Staff Mike Nizich on June 18 approved Monegan's trip to Washington for the purpose of meeting Sen. Lisa Murkowski. The document's existence was first reported by ABC News on Friday. Monegan told ABC that the travel authorization was explicitly to pursue funding for the anti-sexual-violence program, though the document does not state that as a reason for the trip. McCain spokesman Taylor Griffin said Friday that the travel authorization was for a routine trip, and that state commissioners regularly travel to meet members of Alaska's congressional delegation. "He was not authorized to lobby Congress," Griffin said. The revelation came on the same day that several individuals subpoenaed to testify in Troopergate refused to appear as ordered. Those who refused to answer their subpoenas (including Todd Palin, the Governor's husband; Randy Ruaro, the governor's deputy chief of staff; and aide Ivy Frye) will be referred to the full Senate for contempt, said Sen. Hollis French, who is heading the investigation. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:02:00 -0400, A Real Boater wrote:
Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing. And if this is an example of her "executive experience", Alaska can keep her. WTF, the Public Safety Commissioner has to get his itinerary approved? Talk about micro-managing. Try this in Washington and her head will explode. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
WaIIy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:59:11 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:02:00 -0400, A Real Boater wrote: Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing. And if this is an example of her "executive experience", Alaska can keep her. WTF, the Public Safety Commissioner has to get his itinerary approved? Talk about micro-managing. Try this in Washington and her head will explode. He wasn't fired, idiots. He was offered a very good alternative position and resigned instead. This is hilarious...the Republi-retards are *defending* Ms. Palin, just as they defend Bush. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
On Sep 20, 4:25*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"A Real Boater" wrote in messagenews:F_6dnYJpnNmhy0jVnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@comca st.com... wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:02:00 -0400, A Real Boater wrote: Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing. And if this is an example of her "executive experience", Alaska can keep her. *WTF, the Public Safety Commissioner has to get his itinerary approved? *Talk about micro-managing. *Try this in Washington and her head will explode. When I worked for the teacher's union, one of my subordinates in a regional office needed a camera for some of his newsletter work. At one weekend board meeting, the 30-member board debated that purchase for two hours and finally turned it down. Money was not tight. So, after the meeting, I gave him the camera I was using and bought another. I had the power of the pen up to $5000; he did not. The camera was about $125. I have a really hard time with micromanagers. If he was your subordinate and you could authorize and sign up to $5k, why did he have to go before a 30 member board for a $125 capital expenditure? Something doesn't add up. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Let it go, man! Remember, you are trying to make sense to a narrow minded buffoon. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
Eisboch wrote:
"A Real Boater" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:02:00 -0400, A Real Boater wrote: Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing. And if this is an example of her "executive experience", Alaska can keep her. WTF, the Public Safety Commissioner has to get his itinerary approved? Talk about micro-managing. Try this in Washington and her head will explode. When I worked for the teacher's union, one of my subordinates in a regional office needed a camera for some of his newsletter work. At one weekend board meeting, the 30-member board debated that purchase for two hours and finally turned it down. Money was not tight. So, after the meeting, I gave him the camera I was using and bought another. I had the power of the pen up to $5000; he did not. The camera was about $125. I have a really hard time with micromanagers. If he was your subordinate and you could authorize and sign up to $5k, why did he have to go before a 30 member board for a $125 capital expenditure? Something doesn't add up. Eisboch He reported to me for his assignments, but he reported to the regional administrator there for operational (non-salary & fringe) budgetary purposes. I had authority to recommend the hiring and discipline of my subordinates, and to direct their activities. I don't know how it works these days, but that is how it worked back then. The board was deep into micromanaging in those days. The problem was the organization was emerging from its old style of governance into a more political structure. The old way was a professional staff exec director who ran the professional staff and an elected president and board who ran the politics. The board more and more was intruding into staff management. The old exec director model is gone. Those were really the fun days of my young career in trade unionism. I had just joined the union staff after working on two political campaigns in Michigan and after a stint working for SW Tom's hero, Saul Alinsky. I spent a few months on the union flying squad and then was sent to New York to handle a few assignments. Hehehe. When Nixon imposed his wage-price regs, I had to fly back out to Chicago and tell 2000 teacher leaders why classroom teachers were not going to be exempted. Now that was a interesting presentation. But not as much fun as dumping caskets full of books on the steps of a board of education building. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
WaIIy wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:25:49 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "A Real Boater" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:02:00 -0400, A Real Boater wrote: Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing. And if this is an example of her "executive experience", Alaska can keep her. WTF, the Public Safety Commissioner has to get his itinerary approved? Talk about micro-managing. Try this in Washington and her head will explode. When I worked for the teacher's union, one of my subordinates in a regional office needed a camera for some of his newsletter work. At one weekend board meeting, the 30-member board debated that purchase for two hours and finally turned it down. Money was not tight. So, after the meeting, I gave him the camera I was using and bought another. I had the power of the pen up to $5000; he did not. The camera was about $125. I have a really hard time with micromanagers. If he was your subordinate and you could authorize and sign up to $5k, why did he have to go before a 30 member board for a $125 capital expenditure? Something doesn't add up. Eisboch It's an absurd story. Its like the time the freaking EVP wouldn't buy formatted diskettes for 74 cents each. We had to buy the the unformatted diskettes for 69 cents each. 10,000 diskettes at 5 cents a piece was a lot of money to him. When I pointed out that it cost more money for our technicians to format the diskettes he threw me out of his office and bought the formatted diskettes. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
What? Palin lied? Oh...nooooooo.....
WaIIy wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:25:49 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "A Real Boater" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:02:00 -0400, A Real Boater wrote: Palin, saying she did not authorize the expenses for the travel, cited that trip as a primary example of the insubordination that led to Monegan's firing. And if this is an example of her "executive experience", Alaska can keep her. WTF, the Public Safety Commissioner has to get his itinerary approved? Talk about micro-managing. Try this in Washington and her head will explode. When I worked for the teacher's union, one of my subordinates in a regional office needed a camera for some of his newsletter work. At one weekend board meeting, the 30-member board debated that purchase for two hours and finally turned it down. Money was not tight. So, after the meeting, I gave him the camera I was using and bought another. I had the power of the pen up to $5000; he did not. The camera was about $125. I have a really hard time with micromanagers. If he was your subordinate and you could authorize and sign up to $5k, why did he have to go before a 30 member board for a $125 capital expenditure? Something doesn't add up. Eisboch It's an absurd story. Why makes you think "absurdity" and organizational decisions are mutually exclusive? -- http://tinyurl.com/4q88t6 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Whoops - Palin Lied About Foreign Travel - Again | General | |||
Does admiting that you lied | ASA | |||
Does admiting that you lied | ASA | |||
Does admiting that you lied | ASA | |||
Does admiting that you lied | ASA |