On Sep 15, 12:38*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:

"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.

Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of
some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a
housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Sarah Palin who began her campaign
with lies and misrepresentations,

There you go again with the "liar, liar, pants on fire" nonsense
again.

someone without a shred of strategic or
tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience,
and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

You've described Obama.

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the
Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current
condition?

You do like to make up lies, don't you?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

Did Obama serve? He has no "tactical" experience. He has no
"strategic" experience. He has no foreign experience.

Is he a pacifist?

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument that
got us in this mess to begin with.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument that
got us in this mess to begin with.

Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an
independant and we got a liberal."

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument that
got us in this mess to begin with.

Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an
independant and we got a liberal."

Clinton was a moderate conservative.
--
Cliff

On Sep 20, 7:24*am, Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument that
got us in this mess to begin with.

Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an
independant and we got a liberal."

* Clinton was a moderate conservative.
--
Cliff

Cliffie is nuts. Stay away from squirrelly... he's nutless.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:24*am, Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument that
got us in this mess to begin with.

Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an
independant and we got a liberal."

* Clinton was a moderate conservative.
--
Cliff

Cliffie is nuts. Stay away from squirrelly... he's nutless.

Clinton was a moderate conservative.
Why did you think he got elected? Twice?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton
[
His policies, on issues such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and
welfare reform, have been described as "centrist." Clinton presided over the
longest period of peace-time economic expansion in American history, which
included a balanced budget and a reported federal surplus. Based on
Congressional accounting rules, at the end of his presidency Clinton reported a
surplus of $559 billion.
]
[
Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end of office
rating of any President since World War II.
]
--
Cliff

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:29:07 -0400, Cliff wrote:

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:50:14 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 20, 7:24*am, Cliff wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 19:58:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:16*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:41:14 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the
hands of a housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

Another lie, irrelevant, and the old "lesser of two evils" argument
that got us in this mess to begin with.

Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, he was the "I voted for an
independant and we got a liberal."

* Clinton was a moderate conservative. --
Cliff

Cliffie is nuts. Stay away from squirrelly... he's nutless.

Clinton was a moderate conservative.
Why did you think he got elected? Twice?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton
[
His policies, on issues such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
and welfare reform, have been described as "centrist." Clinton presided
over the longest period of peace-time economic expansion in American
history, which included a balanced budget and a reported federal surplus.
Based on Congressional accounting rules, at the end of his presidency
Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion.
]
[
Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end of
office rating of any President since World War II. ]

That's why the Wackos want to disparage him, he was an economic success
that violated some of their deeply held precepts. To admit Slick Willies
success would undermine their delusions.

Sometimes we have to admit that our opinions were wrong. I don't like
Clinton but he did a good job on the economy.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 15, 5:41*am, wrote:
On Sep 15, 12:38*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a
housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

i agree. mccain was born in the panama canal zone. he doesn't deserve
to be president...


someone without a shred of strategic or
tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience,
and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

You've described Obama.

he wants a hillbilly president. after all, the US doesn't need a
leader who can out think putin, or the chinese or the saudis. all she
has to do is show 'em she can shoot and they'll roll right over.

yep, he's republican alright.


You do like to make up lies, don't you?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

Did Obama serve? *He has no "tactical" experience. *He has no
"strategic" experience. *He has no foreign experience.

Is he a pacifist?


which is incorrect. obama authored the bill to find and clean up
weapons of mass destruction in russia...which, otherwise, may have
gone to terrorists. he's lightyears ahead of the sportswriter bimbo.

On Sep 15, 11:46*pm, wf3h wrote:
On Sep 15, 5:41*am, wrote:

On Sep 15, 12:38*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a
housewife without foreign exposure? *

Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

i agree. mccain was born in the panama canal zone. he doesn't deserve
to be president...

So you think the children of service men and service women born on USA
military installations overseas are foreigners? I don't.

someone without a shred of strategic or
tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience,
and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

You've described Obama.

he wants a hillbilly president.

Who wants a hillbilly president? Obama? Squirrelly?

We've recently had a hillbilly president in Bill Clinton.

after all, the US doesn't need a
leader who can out think putin, or the chinese or the saudis. all she
has to do is show 'em she can shoot and they'll roll right over.

Obama couldn't think his way out of a wet cardboard box if he didn't
have his earpiece in.

yep, he's republican alright.

? he? she?

You do like to make up lies, don't you?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

Did Obama serve? *He has no "tactical" experience. *He has no
"strategic" experience. *He has no foreign experience.

Is he a pacifist?

which is incorrect. obama authored the bill to find and clean up
weapons of mass destruction in russia...

Wow! He authored a bill? A real bill? A real USA law that will be a
real law in Russia??? How does that happen?

Was it called SALT 1 or SALT 2? START?

I "feel" so much better knowing that Obama has stood on the wall and
defended me.

which, otherwise, may have
gone to terrorists. he's lightyears ahead of the sportswriter bimbo.

The things you never knew you never knew.

On Sep 15, 11:45*pm, wrote:
On Sep 15, 11:46*pm, wf3h wrote:


Better than putting it in the hands of a foreigner.

i agree. mccain was born in the panama canal zone. he doesn't deserve
to be president...

So you think the children of service men and service women born on USA
military installations overseas are foreigners? *I don't.

nor do i think people born in the US are foreigners...unless, of
course, the constitution has been changed.

given the fact GOP members think the constitution is written in
crayon, you never know.


he wants a hillbilly president.

Who wants a hillbilly president? *Obama? *Squirrelly?

We've recently had a hillbilly president in Bill Clinton.

and he balanced the budget, didn't he. something the intellectual
giant bush never did.


after all, the US doesn't need a
leader who can out think putin, or the chinese or the saudis. all she
has to do is show 'em she can shoot and they'll roll right over.

Obama couldn't think his way out of a wet cardboard box if he didn't
have his earpiece in.

no...sorry...he's not a republican.

which is incorrect. obama authored the bill to find and clean up
weapons of mass destruction in russia...

Wow! *He authored a bill? *A real bill? *A real USA law that will be a
real law in Russia??? *How does that happen?

and what has mccain done in 26 years?

nothing. basically zip. a few bills here and there...nothing of
note...he's done about the same as obama

it just took him 26 years to do it.