On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote:

"greylock" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser"
FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote:

Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who
is
retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House.

*Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world?

How interesting !!!

And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine.

All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest.

McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House.

Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an
administration with a terrible 2nd in command. *Palin is another
bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that
risks our civli liberties.

At least what is left of them.

--
Regards, Curly

Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us
Quayle and Cheney??? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to,
or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start
posting?

Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. And Hillary was more
of a VP than Algore.

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote:

"greylock" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser"
FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote:

Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who
is
retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House.

*Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world?

How interesting !!!

And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine.

All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest.

McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House.

Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an
administration with a terrible 2nd in command. *Palin is another
bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that
risks our civli liberties.

At least what is left of them.

--
Regards, Curly

Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us
Quayle and Cheney??? Do you ever read what it is you are replying to,
or do you just unroll the dem talking points scroll and start
posting?

Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. And Hillary was more
of a VP than Algore.


even Biden admits Hillary is better than he is.

Biden: Hillary a Better Pick Than Me

September 10, 2008 5:17 PM

ABC News' Matthew Jaffe reports: Sen. Barack Obama's, D-Ill., vice
presidential nominee, Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., Wednesday said that Sen.
Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., might have been a better pick for the
position than him.

At a rally in Nashua, N.H., a man in the audience told Biden how glad
he was that Obama picked him over Hillary, "not because she's a woman,
but because, look at the things she did in the past."

"Make no mistake about this," Biden responded. "Hillary Clinton is as
qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the
United States of America. Let’s get that straight. She’s a truly close
personal friend, she is qualified to be president of the United States
of America, she’s easily qualified to be vice president of the United
States of America, and quite frankly, it might have been a better pick
than me. But she’s first rate, I mean that sincerely, she’s first
rate, so let’s get that straight."

Spokesman Ben Porritt offered this response from the McCain camp:
"Barack Obama’s most important decision of this election, and Biden --
the candidate he selects -- suggests, himself, that he wasn’t the
right man for the job, and that Hillary Clinton would have been a
better choice. Biden certainly has a credible viewpoint on this."



"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the
name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program
until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it
happened." -- Norman Thomas, American socialist

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote:

"greylock" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser"
FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote:

Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who
is
retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House.

*Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world?

How interesting !!!

And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine.

All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest.

McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House.

Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers of electing an
administration with a terrible 2nd in command. *Palin is another
bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that
risks our civli liberties.

At least what is left of them.

--
Regards, Curly

Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us
Quayle and Cheney???

Where is your cognitive disconnect? Cheney and Quayle were Vice
Presidents of the United States, no? Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat
away from the Presidency, no? Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of
what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no?

How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to
the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies?

Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll
the dem talking points scroll and start posting?

"Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a
bunch. Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case.

Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. And Hillary was more
of a VP than Algore.

Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. Perhaps parallel thinking is
difficult for you but not the rest of us.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush, Plunderer In Chief
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:05:09 -0700, Gunner Asch wrote:

---Snipped distractions and probably some more lies---

Hey Weasel!

Where's that offered proof there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Still spouting the bull**** that the U.S. Economy is just peachy, you
lying piece of ****...

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bush, Plunderer In Chief
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 13, 4:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote:

"greylock" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser"
FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote:

Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who
is
retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House.

*Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world?

How interesting !!!

And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine.

All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest.

McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House.

Palin is another
bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that
risks our civli liberties.

At least what is left of them.

--
Regards, Curly

Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us
Quayle and Cheney???

Where is your cognitive disconnect? *

I have none, but thanks for asking.

Cheney and Quayle were Vice Presidents of the United States, no? *

Correct.

Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat away from the Presidency, no? *

Correct.

Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no?

No/Yes. I'd have preferred Cheney as president. I don't think about
Quayle much.

And you have changed the parameters of the above dialog. Neither
Quayle nor Cheney were president nor occupied the White House.

How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to
the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies?

Perhaps you want her "creature" billeted at the White House kennel?

Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll
the dem talking points scroll and start posting?

"Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a
bunch. *Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case.

My underwear are just fine. As a matter of fact I just got some of
those new Hanes that are quite comfy. They're probably not available
in Argentina yet.

Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. *And Hillary was more
of a VP than Algore.

Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. *

Correct. Curly: "Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers
of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command."

So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your
perceived danger?

Perhaps parallel thinking is
difficult for you but not the rest of us.

I'm not the one saying that something that didn't happen is PROOF that
Sarah Palin is unfit to be president. You are.

--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---
* * * * * * * * * * * *Bush, Plunderer In Chief
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---

wrote:
On Sep 13, 4:01 pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 12, 5:58 pm, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote:

"greylock" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser"
FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote:


So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your
perceived danger?

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election.
Palin is.

--

John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com

"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election.
Palin is.


Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of
some liberal boner shrinker.

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:



"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.


Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of
some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a
housewife without foreign exposure? Sarah Palin who began her campaign
with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or
tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience,
and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the
Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current
condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:



"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.


Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of
some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a
housewife without foreign exposure? Sarah Palin who began her campaign
with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or
tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience,
and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the
Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current
condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ..............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-


She is the Veep. What foreign experience does Obama have? Not a lot from
his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Being the most liberal
legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who works for a living.
How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs?
How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens earnings?

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:


"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:



"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.


Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead
of some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? Sarah Palin who began her
campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of
strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military
experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded
the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its
current condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ..............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-


She is the Veep.

No, she's not.

What foreign experience does Obama have?

Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. Of all the highly qualified people
McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who
thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored,
and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago.

That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America.

Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Being the
most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who
works for a living.

Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for him.

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of
Sarah Palin.

How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens
earnings?

That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. I will get
into that useless, futile, arguement. Instead I will vote for a good
candidate not a pawn of others.



--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-