On Sep 21, 10:52*am, wrote:
On Sep 16, 9:37*pm, wrote:





On Sep 14, 1:54*pm, wrote:

On Sep 13, 4:01*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008 07:07:16 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 12, 5:58*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:24:30 -0700, Roy Blankenship wrote:

"greylock" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:16:05 -0500, "Rob Fraser"
FraserRacing"AT"RobFraser.Net wrote:

Well this is cruel but true- If the Republicans do win, She has a kid who
is
retarded so there will technically still be a retard in the White House.

*Does the Vice-President live in the White House in your world?

How interesting !!!

And I wouldn't call it cruel - I'd call it - and you - *assinine.

All the bull**** the neocons have thrown out? Give it a rest.

McCain won't finish his term, and then she WILL be in the White House.

Palin is another
bible-thumping crazymother****er (yeah, I know that's redundant) that
risks our civli liberties.

At least what is left of them.

--
Regards, Curly

Curly, Roy is saying Sarah Palin will be president and you give us
Quayle and Cheney???

Where is your cognitive disconnect? *

I have none, but thanks for asking.

Cheney and Quayle were Vice Presidents of the United States, no? *

Correct.

Cheney and Quayle were one heartbeat away from the Presidency, no? *

Correct.

Cheney and Quayle were horrid examples of what "might have been" if they had ascended the throne, no?

No/Yes. *I'd have preferred Cheney as president. *I don't think about
Quayle much.

And you have changed the parameters of the above dialog. *Neither
Quayle nor Cheney were president nor occupied the White House.

Why doesn't the little squirrel reply?

How does that differ in kind, not detail, from Sarah Palin ascending to
the Presidency when/if McCain is elected and dies?

Perhaps you want her "creature" billeted at the White House kennel?

Do you ever read what it is you are replying to, or do you just unroll
the dem talking points scroll and start posting?

"Phoney Outrage" is the term, you make **** up to get your panties in a
bunch. *Follow the logic, even though that appears difficult in your case.

My underwear are just fine. *As a matter of fact I just got some of
those new Hanes that are quite comfy. *They're probably not available
in Argentina yet.

Neither Quayle nor Cheney have become president. *And Hillary was more
of a VP than Algore.

Nor has Sarah Palin "become" president. *

Correct. *Curly: *"Dan Quayle and Dick Cheney have proven the dangers
of electing an administration with a terrible 2nd in command."

So how does Cheney and Quayle having NOT been president PROVEN your
perceived danger?

Why doesn't the little squirrel reply?

Perhaps parallel thinking is
difficult for you but not the rest of us.

I'm not the one saying that something that didn't happen is PROOF that
Sarah Palin is unfit to be president. *You are.

So why doesn't the little squirrel address his failed logic?

Everyone knows he is so much smarter than me so it should be a simple
matter for him to use "honest dialog" to dispatch me.

Where are you, little squirrel???

Where Oh where has my little squirrel gone, Oh where oh where can he
be?

With his brain cut short and tail cut long so he can tuck it in
between his legs...