"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:



"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.


Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead of
some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of a
housewife without foreign exposure? Sarah Palin who began her campaign
with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of strategic or
tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military experience,
and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded the
Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its current
condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ..............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-


She is the Veep. What foreign experience does Obama have? Not a lot from
his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Being the most liberal
legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who works for a living.
How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social programs?
How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens earnings?

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:


"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:



"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.


Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead
of some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? Sarah Palin who began her
campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of
strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military
experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded
the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its
current condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ..............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-


She is the Veep.

No, she's not.

What foreign experience does Obama have?

Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. Of all the highly qualified people
McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who
thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored,
and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago.

That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America.

Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Being the
most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who
works for a living.

Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for him.

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of
Sarah Palin.

How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens
earnings?

That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. I will get
into that useless, futile, arguement. Instead I will vote for a good
candidate not a pawn of others.



--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 15, 1:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:

"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:

"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.

Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead
of some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? *Sarah Palin who began her
campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of
strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military
experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded
the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its
current condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---
* * * * * *I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---

.................................................. ..............
* * * Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
* * * * * * athttp://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

She is the Veep.

No, she's not.

She will be.

What foreign experience does Obama have?

Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. *

You demand foreign experience in a VP, but not in the President?
You're an idiot.

Of all the highly qualified people
McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who
thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored,
and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago.

He did? Who might that be? Cites?

That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America.

What do you know of America? You speak ESL and live in Argentina.
Some American you are.

Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. *Being the
most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who
works for a living.

Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for him..

By voting for a third party, you get Obama.

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of
Sarah Palin.

So you have no wages taxable by the USA? Are you sure you're an
American?

How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens
earnings?

That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. *I will get
into that useless, futile, arguement. *Instead I will vote for a good
candidate not a pawn of others.

--
Regards, Curly

You've got it all figured out and will vote for Obama via a
surrogate. You're one smart feller.

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:47:47 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:

"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:

"John R. Carroll" wrote in
message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election.
Palin is.

Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years,
instead of some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands
of a housewife without foreign exposure? Â*Sarah Palin who began her
campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of
strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no
military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her
religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded
the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its
current condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Â*---
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Â*---

.................................................. .............. Â* Â*
* Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*
athttp://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous,
UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

She is the Veep.

No, she's not.

She will be.

What foreign experience does Obama have?

Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. Â*

You demand foreign experience in a VP,

Precisely.

but not in the President? You're an idiot.

Work on your reading comprehension.

Of all the highly qualified people
McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who
thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored,
and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago.

He did? Who might that be? Cites?

Ron Paul.

That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America.

What do you know of America? You speak ESL and live in Argentina. Some
American you are.

You, who support Bush, are in no position to judge.

Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Â*Being
the most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody
who works for a living.

Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for
him.

By voting for a third party, you get Obama.

You just said that Sarah Palin will be the next VP, which is it?

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of,
of Sarah Palin.

So you have no wages taxable by the USA? Are you sure you're an
American?

I'm a true patriot, not a loyalist.

How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens
earnings?

That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. Â*I will get
into that useless, futile, arguement. Â*Instead I will vote for a good
candidate not a pawn of others.

--
Regards, Curly

You've got it all figured out and will vote for Obama via a surrogate.

And you're a loyalist voting for the status quo. You've sold your vote in
a decidedly un-American manner thwarting the concept of the electoral
system.

You're one smart feller.

Thank you.

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 15, 11:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:47:47 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:

"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:

"John R. Carroll" wrote in
message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election.
Palin is.

Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years,
instead of some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands
of a housewife without foreign exposure? Â*Sarah Palin who began her
campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of
strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no
military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her
religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded
the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its
current condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*Â*---
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*Â*---

.................................................. .............. Â* Â*
* Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*
athttp://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous,
UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

She is the Veep.

No, she's not.

She will be.

What foreign experience does Obama have?

Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. Â*

You demand foreign experience in a VP,

Precisely.

but not in the President? You're an idiot.

Work on your reading comprehension.

Work on posting precisely what you mean. Kindly explain Obama's
foreign service experience.

Of all the highly qualified people
McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who
thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored,
and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago.

He did? *Who might that be? *Cites?

Ron Paul.

Ron Paul said all that? I just don't believe you.

That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America..

What do you know of America? *You speak ESL and live in Argentina. Some
American you are.

You, who support Bush, are in no position to judge.

But I am.

I am not the government and you are not applying to me for a job.

I can judge you all day long, every day.

As a matter of fact, I'm judging you right now.

Hint... you're not doing so good.

Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Â*Being
the most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody
who works for a living.

Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for
him.

By voting for a third party, you get Obama.

You just said that Sarah Palin will be the next VP, which is it?

Depends. Which way are you voting?

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None,

Exactly. You are here only to take.

but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of,
of Sarah Palin.

So you have no wages taxable by the USA? *Are you sure you're an
American?

I'm a true patriot, not a loyalist.

You sound more like a tax evader. Why aren't you paying taxes?

How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens
earnings?

That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. Â*I will get
into that useless, futile, arguement. Â*Instead I will vote for a good
candidate not a pawn of others.

--
Regards, Curly

You've got it all figured out and will vote for Obama via a surrogate.

And you're a loyalist voting for the status quo. *You've sold your vote in
a decidedly un-American manner thwarting the concept of the electoral
system.

You call the peaceful transfer of power which we Americans practice un-
American?

Why don't you stay in Argentina and wait for the next revolution or
coup?

You're one smart feller.

Thank you.

--
Regards, Curly

You're welcome.

On Sep 15, 1:13*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:

"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:

"John R. Carroll" wrote in message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election. Palin
is.

Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years, instead
of some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands of
a housewife without foreign exposure? *Sarah Palin who began her
campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of
strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no military
experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her religion?

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God commanded
the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run America in its
current condition?

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---
* * * * * *I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---

.................................................. ..............
* * * Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
* * * * * * athttp://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

She is the Veep.

No, she's not.

What foreign experience does Obama have?

Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. *Of all the highly qualified people
McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing wacko who
thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be censored,
and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago.

That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America.

Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. *Being the
most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who
works for a living.

Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for him..

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of
Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens
earnings?

That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. *I will get
into that useless, futile, arguement. *Instead I will vote for a good
candidate not a pawn of others.

--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---
* * * * * * I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like Chickenhawks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*---

.................................................. ..............
* * * *Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
* * * * * * * athttp://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:

On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:46:24 -0700, Calif Bill wrote:

"Curly Surmudgeon" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:13 -0500, Jerry wrote:

"John R. Carroll" wrote in
message
...

Cheney and Quayle weren't in line behind a guy that is likely to be
undergoing chemo during the first few month's after an election.
Palin is.

Good, then we get to watch her on TV for the next eight years,
instead of some liberal boner shrinker.

Do you really look forward to putting the United States in the hands
of a housewife without foreign exposure? Â*Sarah Palin who began her
campaign with lies and misrepresentations, someone without a shred of
strategic or tactical experience, speaks no other languages, no
military experience, and wants to burn library books based upon her
religion?

You evaded this question.

Are you really postulating that Sarah Palin, who thinks God
commanded the Iraq and Afghanistani wars, is qualified to run
America in its current condition?

You evaded this question.

Or are you a pacifist troll trying to tweak noses?

You evaded this question.

--
Regards, Curly
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Â*---
Â* Â* Â* Â* Â* Â*I Love Republicans, They Taste Just Like
Chickenhawks
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Â*---

.................................................. .............. Â*
Â* * Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access Â* Â* Â* Â*
Â* Â*
athttp://www.TitanNews.com -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous,
UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

She is the Veep.

No, she's not.

Why do you say Sarah Palin is the Vice President of the United States?

What foreign experience does Obama have?

Irrelevant in the Sara Palin context. Â*Of all the highly qualified
people McCain could have had for the position he chose a right-wing
wacko who thinks God commanded these wars, that library material must be
censored, and that the earth was created 4,000 years ago.

That is a very bad choice for John McCain and unacceptable for America.

Not a lot from his few days he has showed up in the Senate. Â*Being the
most liberal legislator is enough to give the shivers to anybody who
works for a living.

Do not expect me to defend Barak Obama, ask someone who will vote for
him.

Instead of trying to detour the thread, why not stay on topic?

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of
Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? I "asked for a cite"? Where do you see
a request in this thread?

You've evaded the rebuttal to your mistruths and now fabricate nonsense to
what end? Man, you're raising insanity to a new level...

How much do you want to mortgage your children and grandchildrens
earnings?

That implies that Obama/Biden are worse than McCain/Palin. Â*I will get
into that useless, futile, arguement. Â*Instead I will vote for a good
candidate not a pawn of others.

Any other gymnastics to avoid substantive discourse on the thread?

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of, of
Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you see
a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. If you don't remember when or
where you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:15:36 -0700, almostcutmyhairtoday wrote:

On Sep 21, 1:32*pm, Curly Surmudgeon wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 07:37:56 -0700, hot-ham-and-cheese wrote:
On Sep 15, 1:13Â*am, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:

How much of your wages are you going to contribute to his social
programs?

None, but that, too, is irrelevant to the qualifications, or lack of,
of Sarah Palin.

You asked for a cite, little squirrel, and here it is.

What are you babbling about now? *I "asked for a cite"? *Where do you
see a request in this thread?

This is the cite you've asked for. If you don't remember when or where
you asked for such a cite, that's your problem.

You're making **** up again, just like your twisted subject line.

Anyway, good luck with your tax evasion program.

You are a pathological liar:

"From Andrea Broadbent "The Truth about Truman": To begin, the definition
of pathological actually means abnormal or grossly atypical. Therefore, a
pathological liar prevaricates more frequently than the average person or
tells more abnormal lies. In most cases, pathological liars tell lies that
are "unplanned and impulsive" (Hausman). These lies are usually very
emotional stories that tend to serve no purpose except to impress people
(Ford 133). As of now, psychiatrists are unsure whether or not
pathological liars are fully capable of realizing if and when they are
lying, so detecting whether or not a person is a pathological liar is a
very difficult task (Hausman). By looking at the list of conditions
commonly connected with people considered to be pathological liars,
psychiatrists are better able to determine whether or not a person might
actually have the disorder. Some main qualities linked with pathological
liars include dysfunctional family origin, family lying patterns,
anomalies of sexual life, frequent substance abuse, and a great capacity
for language."

--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




.................................................. ...............
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
at http://www.TitanNews.com
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 13:37:42 -0700, Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:


"From Andrea Broadbent "The Truth about Truman": Some main qualities linked with pathological
liars include dysfunctional family origin, family lying patterns,
anomalies of sexual life, frequent substance abuse, and a great capacity
for language."

Wow.
--
John H.