On Sep 15, 6:32*am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:19:28 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
Rigid or non-rigid?

Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? *Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). *:)

What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...

Which part - the spherical harmonic maps or the fact that I'm an
idiot? *:)

If you are the latter, yo can understand the former...

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Anything to do with Klingons? 8)
Nope - although it might as well have been.
Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)



What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are talking
about ...

Eisboch



No one does, including SWS.

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Anything to do with Klingons? 8)
Nope - although it might as well have been.
Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)



What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are
talking about ...

Eisboch


No one does, including SWS.



Another off-topic "discussion" in rec.boats

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.

sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed

How about rich DNC contributors?

you mean both of them?

More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.

DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....

Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems


I referred to Congress.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm

1 in 3 makes over a million a year.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:


Anything to do with Klingons? 8)


Nope - although it might as well have been.

Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)

Rigid or non-rigid?

Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)

And now, for someting completely different.

For some reason, the rear passenger tire on Mrs.Wave's town car is
flat.

I must analyze this. :)

Would not all Hyperbolic surfaces be non parabolic?

What I am analysing is the brakes on the boat trailer. Just bleed them a
week ago and now no brakes again. Found a cracked bleeder seat. Now to
find a new seat adapter. Brass on Kodiak Disk Brakes.

"A Boater" wrote in message
...
Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 03:56:10 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in
message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:24:14 -0400, "D.Duck" wrote:

Anything to do with Klingons? 8)
Nope - although it might as well have been.
Hyperbolic Riemann Surfaces which are not parabolic and their use as
evaluative data sets in high energy particle analysis.

Aren't you glad you asked? :)


Rigid or non-rigid?


Non-rigid by definition. rigid by application.

The fun part of the whole exercise were the spherical harmonic maps
which once they were plotted, were quite beautiful and almost three
dimensional - which, oddly, would have taken them out of two space and
into three space which was not a result I expected, but it happened.

Three and a half years, 25 hours a week, tons of calculations, graphs,
formings and misformings, draft graphics, proofing, printing and
presentations.

Was it worth it? Yes because it was interesting and frankly, my one
and only single talent that I don't honestly have to work at -
nonsense came naturally to me - idiot savant like if you will (yes, I
said it). :)



What's even funnier is the fact that I haven't a clue what you are
talking about ...

Eisboch


No one does, including SWS.



Another off-topic "discussion" in rec.boats

Maybe the surface boats transit are Hyperbolic Reimen Surfaces?

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:56:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:21:28 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:59:02 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:GICdnWCs37yx91DVnZ2dnUVZ_hidnZ2d@earthl ink.com...


Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.
Well except at a University.

Most PhD's that I know should have never left the University.

(whoops .... hope ShortWave isn't lurking)

HEY!!!!

Some of us overeducated morons live in the real world you know.

Like this one?
http://ourlighterside.com/stuff/engineer/

Anybody who drives a car with the jet turbine intake sitting less than
a foot from his elbow can not possibly qualify as living in the real
world no matter how you try to define it. :)

Got a screen over the intake. Might be different if he tried to run it at
110% power.

Anybody who drives a car with the jet turbine intake sitting less than
a foot from his elbow can not possibly qualify as living in the real
world no matter how you try to define it. :)

Phd. ;}

On Sep 15, 2:45*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message

....
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message

....
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.

sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed

How about rich DNC contributors?

you mean both of them?

More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.

DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....

Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems

I referred to Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm

1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

as i said, it depends on what year

and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.

"wf3h" wrote in message
...
On Sep 15, 2:45 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.

sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed

How about rich DNC contributors?

you mean both of them?

More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.

DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....

Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems

I referred to Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm

1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

as i said, it depends on what year

and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.

I said Congress at first. You are the one who has comprehension problems.

On Sep 15, 6:08*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 15, 2:45 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:





"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 11:43 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message

....
On Sep 14, 9:57 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

"wf3h" wrote in message

...
On Sep 14, 7:22 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:

companies. And that is a crap shoot in the best of times. You get
another
job. Just because you have a Phd does not mean you get lifetime
employment.

sure it does. you just have to be a rich GOP contributor. then the
govt will protect you. if you're middle class, you're screwed

How about rich DNC contributors?

you mean both of them?

More millionaire Dems in Congress than Repubs. Soros, a plague on the
people of the earth, is rich Dem supporter.

DUH!! there are more dems in congress than there are repubs. kind of
like 'who's buried in grant's tomb'....

Even when there were less Dems, more dem rich.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

when? in 2003, 22 members of the senate were millionaire republicans;
18 were dems

I referred to Congress.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0630-05.htm

1 in 3 makes over a million a year.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

as i said, it depends on what year

and, yes, the senate is part of congress. congress is composed of the
house and the senate. read your constitution.

I said Congress at first. *You are the one who has comprehension problems.-

if you could read, instead of having someone read this to you, you'd
be a democrat, not a hezbollah member