John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?

Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.

"Ban"? He can only control what goes though his server. The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.

DK wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?

Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.

"Ban"? He can only control what goes though his server. The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.

Check the latest development at Chuck's Kudos to SW

On Sep 9, 8:06*pm, jim wrote:
DK wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?

Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.

"Ban"? *He can only control what goes though his server. *The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.

Check the latest development at Chuck's Kudos to SW- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...34881f48773a0#

Particularly, the fifth paragraph, second and third sentence...
It's doesn't take much to have things fall apart. But you do what you
gotta' do...

On Sep 9, 8:06*pm, jim wrote:
DK wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?

Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.

"Ban"? *He can only control what goes though his server. *The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.

Check the latest development at Chuck's Kudos to SW

I would like to see a copy of what he posted. I missed it and it
has been deleted over there.

Not taking sides.........just want to see what resulted in a permanent
ban.

BTW: How is it that you are still able to post over there after being
permanently banned by Chuck?

Has Tom checked into that?

JimH wrote:
On Sep 9, 8:06 pm, jim wrote:
DK wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?
My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.
Anyone know of any decent free readers?
Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.
He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.
"Ban"? He can only control what goes though his server. The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.
Check the latest development at Chuck's Kudos to SW

I would like to see a copy of what he posted. I missed it and it
has been deleted over there.

Not taking sides.........just want to see what resulted in a permanent
ban.

BTW: How is it that you are still able to post over there after being
permanently banned by Chuck?

Has Tom checked into that?



What's the "latest development" in chuck's kudos? :)

Is Chuck still involved in his message board, or has he turned it over
to Brownie? I haven't seen any significant presence of chuck in a hell
of along time.

jim wrote:
DK wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?

Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.

"Ban"? He can only control what goes though his server. The dozens
of other servers will still post anything here.

Check the latest development at Chuck's Kudos to SW

It's about time. Good call, LOQ!

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:58:22 -0400, DK wrote:

John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?

Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.

"Ban"? He can only control what goes though his server. The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.

I meant ban from his server.

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:06:36 -0400, jim wrote:

DK wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?

Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.

"Ban"? He can only control what goes though his server. The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.

Check the latest development at Chuck's Kudos to SW

Ditto.

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:58:22 -0400, DK wrote:

John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?

My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.

Anyone know of any decent free readers?
Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.

He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.
"Ban"? He can only control what goes though his server. The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.

I meant ban from his server.

10-4.

On Sep 9, 8:32*pm, hk wrote:
JimH wrote:
On Sep 9, 8:06 pm, jim wrote:
DK wrote:
John H wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 05:54:38 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
Anyway, I see we have a new rule here, is it because of Gene's server?
My readers 30 day trial ran out so this post won't show up there
anyway.
Anyone know of any decent free readers?
Gene announced it yesterday, I believe, in response to a question I had
about all the name-calling attack posts showing up over there.
He's instituted an OT rule, and threatened to ban those who can't keep
their act together.
"Ban"? *He can only control what goes though his server. *The dozens of
other servers will still post anything here.
Check the latest development at Chuck's Kudos to SW

I would like to see a copy of what he posted. * I missed it and it
has been deleted over there.

Not taking sides.........just want to see what resulted in a permanent
ban.

BTW: *How is it that you are still able to post over there after being
permanently banned by Chuck?

Has Tom checked into that?

What's the "latest development" in chuck's kudos? *:)

Is Chuck still involved in his message board, or has he turned it over
to Brownie? I haven't seen any significant presence of chuck in a hell
of along time.

As I said, I am not taking sides. I just want to see the entire post
from you that resulted in you being permanently banned.

I also want to know why FL Jim is still able to access and post to
that place after being permanently banned.