On Sep 7, 6:50*pm, hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
...

I won't dispute that Tom knows something about boats, but I will dispute
that I drove him off. He was tossing insults with the best of him, and
apparently only got ****ed when I deigned to question his "superior"
knowledge in areas where it wasn't.

I don't know Tom well, but I have met him a couple of times. * One thing I
know for sure though .... Tom doesn't get "driven off" by anybody,
especially someone like you who thinks he is the de facto king of rec.boats.

But, Harry, you display the lowest form of hypocritical BS to be found here.
Tom agreed to mind the store at Chuck's Island for a while and simply
insisted that Chuck's forum rules be respected. *Contrary to your claims in
rec.boats, *you were the worst offender of the rules with snarky, poorly
veiled insults directed at others, in direct violation of Chuck's requests.
Tom had a level of control over things and your ego just couldn't deal with
that.

You became so frustrated, the "Brownie" comments and insults started.
Christ, anybody with a 5th grade education could follow this cute little
display. *I suspect that part of your problem is dealing with the fact that
Tom's IQ is probably 30 or 40 points higher than yours, another fact that
your inflated ego just can't handle.

It's fine to disagree about transom heights. *But it's wrong to insult, call
names and, when you get really, really frustrated simply employ your
childish "ESAD" *comment. * *You really are a piece of work. * Or sick.
Seriously.

Eisboch

Yawn. Tom had control over the kill switch, that's all. He may be the
worst moderator I have ever encountered. He handled Chuck's place like
Brownie handled the aftermath of Katrina.

Your buddy Tom spent about a year insulting my boat. He got a couple of
weeks of it back, and he folded his tent.

I don't know what Tom's IQ is, nor do I care. I have noticed though,
that when he is questioned, he gets mad.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****.

On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:29:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote:



All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****.

Loogy, his 'childish bull****' is sucking you in.

Please.

John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:29:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote:


All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****.

Loogy, his 'childish bull****' is sucking you in.

Please.

Agreed.

wrote in message
...
All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I doubt one person could run Tom out of anywhere.
My guess is that he can only tolerate so much crap and with the drone unit
and various associates filling the newsgroup on an hourly basis... it just
didn't make sense to waste his time here...especially if he has an
opportunity for gainful employment.

wrote in message
...

All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****.

----------------------------------

Loogy, an attempt is being made to clean up this NG. Doing so requires
restraint by all to stop the insults, attacks and most importantly, instant,
knee-jerk responses to those that have contributed to the mess. Doing so
only perpetuates the crap.

Please join in the effort.

Eisboch