On Sep 7, 9:13*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Sep 7, 8:36 pm, jim wrote:

It's so sad to see Tom leave.

There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive.

A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who
exhibits similar behavior could work.

Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference
over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via
email.

We can. It almost happened before when the ones of us left completely
ignored him. We could do it again but then he gets crazy and makes
some sock puppets or a thinly veiled troll having to do with boats.. I
say everyone should have one respons to anything he says, a dot and
the words screw off. No matter what he says... Shun anybody stupid
enough to engage him, and just let him go...

-------------------------------------------------------------
I would suggest forgetting even the Chucky dots or *any* comment.
To use them acknowledges presence of the offending poster.

Eisboch

[The members of this news group have unanimously decided that this
poster is detrimental to the group in general. Therefore, this and all
future posts, questions, trolls, and sockpuppets will be ignored]

wrote in message
...
On Sep 7, 9:13 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Sep 7, 8:36 pm, jim wrote:

It's so sad to see Tom leave.

There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive.

A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who
exhibits similar behavior could work.

Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference
over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via
email.

We can. It almost happened before when the ones of us left completely
ignored him. We could do it again but then he gets crazy and makes
some sock puppets or a thinly veiled troll having to do with boats.. I
say everyone should have one respons to anything he says, a dot and
the words screw off. No matter what he says... Shun anybody stupid
enough to engage him, and just let him go...

-------------------------------------------------------------
I would suggest forgetting even the Chucky dots or *any* comment.
To use them acknowledges presence of the offending poster.

Eisboch

[The members of this news group have unanimously decided that this
poster is detrimental to the group in general. Therefore, this and all
future posts, questions, trolls, and sockpuppets will be ignored]

-----------------------------------------------------

"Persona non grata"

Eisboch

On Sep 7, 9:38*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Sep 7, 9:13 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Sep 7, 8:36 pm, jim wrote:

It's so sad to see Tom leave.

There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive.

A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who
exhibits similar behavior could work.

Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference
over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via
email.

We can. It almost happened before when the ones of us left completely
ignored him. We could do it again but then he gets crazy and makes
some sock puppets or a thinly veiled troll having to do with boats.. I
say everyone should have one respons to anything he says, a dot and
the words screw off. No matter what he says... Shun anybody stupid
enough to engage him, and just let him go...

-------------------------------------------------------------
I would suggest forgetting even the Chucky dots or *any* comment.
To use them acknowledges presence of the offending poster.

Eisboch

[The members of this news group have unanimously decided that this
poster is detrimental to the group in general. Therefore, this and all
future posts, questions, trolls, and sockpuppets will be ignored]

-----------------------------------------------------

"Persona non grata"

Eisboch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But I might spell it wrong But it's done, anyone else in?

But I might spell it wrong But it's done, anyone else in?

I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone
else doesn't do the same. Even when you respond with your disclaimer, harry
*knows* he's getting attention. That's the problem... he thrives on it
postitive or negative.

--Mike

wrote in message
...
On Sep 7, 9:38 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message

...
On Sep 7, 9:13 pm, "Eisboch" wrote:





wrote in message

...
On Sep 7, 8:36 pm, jim wrote:

It's so sad to see Tom leave.

There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive.

A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who
exhibits similar behavior could work.

Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could
conference
over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via
email.

We can. It almost happened before when the ones of us left completely
ignored him. We could do it again but then he gets crazy and makes
some sock puppets or a thinly veiled troll having to do with boats.. I
say everyone should have one respons to anything he says, a dot and
the words screw off. No matter what he says... Shun anybody stupid
enough to engage him, and just let him go...

-------------------------------------------------------------
I would suggest forgetting even the Chucky dots or *any* comment.
To use them acknowledges presence of the offending poster.

Eisboch

[The members of this news group have unanimously decided that this
poster is detrimental to the group in general. Therefore, this and all
future posts, questions, trolls, and sockpuppets will be ignored]

-----------------------------------------------------

"Persona non grata"

Eisboch- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

But I might spell it wrong But it's done, anyone else in?

On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote:

I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone
else doesn't do the same.

Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the
problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be
filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage
here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry.

wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote:

I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone
else doesn't do the same.

Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the
problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be
filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage
here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry.

That's exactly what harry wants. Ignore him, and it will stop... simple as
that. There's no need to "defend yourself" from him. harry knows nothing
about any of us. Anything he says is pure fabrication, surely the
intelligent here must realize that!

--Mike

On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:11:20 -0700, "Mike" wrote:


wrote in message
et...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote:

I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone
else doesn't do the same.

Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the
problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be
filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage
here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry.

That's exactly what harry wants. Ignore him, and it will stop... simple as
that. There's no need to "defend yourself" from him. harry knows nothing
about any of us. Anything he says is pure fabrication, surely the
intelligent here must realize that!

--Mike


The intelligent realize that, but no one here meets that criterium.
And then there's Scotty @ SmallNutz.com, who really drags the curve
down!

wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote:

I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone
else doesn't do the same.

Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the
problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be
filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage
here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry.

Bingo..... and the award goes to.....Mr Thunder

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote:

I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone
else doesn't do the same.
Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the
problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be
filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage
here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry.

Bingo..... and the award goes to.....Mr Thunder




Look at it this way...if it weren't for me, rec.boats would be nothing
but endless drooling about grandchildren, golf, travel trailers,
guitars, cholesterol-laden recipes, the good old days in uniform, and
watching JustWaitaLoogy ejaculate.

:)

wrote:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote:

I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone
else doesn't do the same.

Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the
problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be
filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage
here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry.

I disagree. He is a scab on the ass of most people here. Ignoring WAFA
will make him go away.