"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
news
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.

2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury trial.

3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.

4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this has
cost you money.

5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to cause
your sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is
almost certainly unwinable.


This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:03:47 -0400, "Jim" wrote:



This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

Uh, I have it.. and for the record, looking at Harry's place via
google sattelite would suggest that he indeed has the outbuildings he
has posted pics of, and the natural boundries and access suggest that
either he owns a lot of land, or he has rented a house in the middle
of a huge section of undeveloped property.. I'm just sayin'...

RowdyMouseRacing "Crap free at last"

On Aug 16, 12:17*pm, RMR wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:03:47 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

Uh, I have it.. and for the record, looking at Harry's place via
google sattelite would suggest that he indeed has the outbuildings he
has posted pics of, and the natural boundries and access suggest that
either he owns a lot of land, or he has rented a house in the middle
of a huge section of undeveloped property.. I'm just sayin'...

RowdyMouseRacing "Crap free at last"

I've seen that, too. I believe you're using the correct address, but
the mistake is with Google. I've driven by the same address that
you're using for the Google view and it's nothing like the view you're
seeing on Google. I suspect that the crafty "you know who" may have
discovered this mistake a while back and used it for his own benefit
(ie: to brag about acreage, outbuildings, etc.).

camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 16, 12:17 pm, RMR wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:03:47 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.
Uh, I have it.. and for the record, looking at Harry's place via
google sattelite would suggest that he indeed has the outbuildings he
has posted pics of, and the natural boundries and access suggest that
either he owns a lot of land, or he has rented a house in the middle
of a huge section of undeveloped property.. I'm just sayin'...

RowdyMouseRacing "Crap free at last"

I've seen that, too. I believe you're using the correct address, but
the mistake is with Google. I've driven by the same address that
you're using for the Google view and it's nothing like the view you're
seeing on Google. I suspect that the crafty "you know who" may have
discovered this mistake a while back and used it for his own benefit
(ie: to brag about acreage, outbuildings, etc.).





And camac dumps another load of


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../cam-dumps.jpg










into rec.boats.


Better put on your cpap mask, schitt-for-brains...your brain is
oxygen-starved.







--
If you want to talk boating or fishing, you're in the wrong place.
rec.boats is the domain of the Seven Little Schitts, who mostly
talk trash. The current members are "Reggie," Loogy, Florida Jim,
DK, BAR and JohnH, and alternates Mike and an occasional
floater.

Try thehulltruth.com or other properly moderated discussion boards
if you want to talk about boats.

Jim wrote:

"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
news
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the
reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly
diminishes your protection under the laws.

2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge
can not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury
trial.

3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of
cases in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular
is rampant with this behavior.

4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this
has cost you money.

5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims
that would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You
could find yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to
do with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to
cause your sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case
that is almost certainly unwinable.


This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way
could anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

A simple ISP subpoena will take care of that.