| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So... |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
On Jul 14, 12:05*pm, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message om... Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", *a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". *You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all *would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and *post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. *It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. * **You* can't fix it. * But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. Then why don't you do just that? Shut your stupid pie hole and watch. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Like your girlfriend JimH stated, some people that enjoy boating also have other varied interests. |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So... Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here. I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one. Look what you'd have to gain! |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
On Jul 14, 7:59*pm, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:nYudnZFj4sA17ebVnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@comcast. com... Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", *a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". *You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all *would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and *post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. *It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. * **You* can't fix it. * But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So... Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here. I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one. Look what you'd have to gain! JimH View profile More options Jul 14, 7:35 pm Newsgroups: rec.boats From: JimH Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Local: Mon, Jul 14 2008 7:35 pm Subject: Ping: SW Tom Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author On Jul 14, 7:12 pm, JimH wrote: - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - On Jul 14, 6:47 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:40:15 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: If I am wrong, then I was right to begin with. Carry on. The problem with The God of Posts is that he intentionally distorts and misapplies what he is told. Which means that no matter what you actually say, it's automatically wrong. Your dealing with somebody who is in a permanent state of PMS. Attack the messenger rather than address the message being deliverd. You just cannot stand being proved wrong...........a trend you continue to prove. Update............an email just received: ======================================== From: xxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 4:21 PM To: Robin Parker Subject: Question Thanks! My concern is what looks like a low transom and water coming in over it, especially when backing down. If I do not opt for the splashboard will I have this problem? Thanks Jim ================================================== = - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - ----- Original Message ----- From: Robin Parker To: xxxxxx Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 6:47 PM Subject: Question The splashboard can be added in the aftermarket if you choose. I run the 21SE without a splashboard. Sincerely, Robin Parker Marketing/Dealer Support ================================================== BTW: The name calling and low blows seem to be coming from folks here claiming they want to improve the tone and quality of this NG. Eh? |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So... Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here. I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one. Look what you'd have to gain! Deal. Not that you had anything to add, boating-wise, there or here. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So... Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here. I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one. Look what you'd have to gain! WAFA can't, John. He has a mental disease that controls his behavior. |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:08:44 -0400, DK wrote:
John H. wrote: On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So... Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here. I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one. Look what you'd have to gain! WAFA can't, John. He has a mental disease that controls his behavior. He's done it. Now, what are you gaining by the posts you've made in the past hour? |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Who sent me a PM in Chuck's Place?
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:08:44 -0400, DK wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:05:58 -0400, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. Most of what you fellows do, 24-7, is either fling juvenile insults, discuss subjects that have nothing to do with any aspect or boating, or act like idiots. Because of you and your dwarfs, I simply gave up on this place as a forum for boating discussions, and I freely admit I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of you and your buddies. If all you did was "watch", a good chunk of the problem would go away. You don't "watch". You (and others) pounce upon certain individuals regardless of the subject of their posts or to whom they are addressed. The only way to restore rec.boats to something other than a personal insult free-for-all would be for everybody to retire the past, forget about old issues and conflicts, and post as if all were meeting for the first time. Problem is, it would require 100% participation and that just isn't going to happen. Eisboch tell you what, Richard, as an old Westvillian to an aging Amityite, you work assiduously on getting the seven dwarfs to behave and I'll work on the rest. how's that? No thanks. It would be like trying to solve a Catch-22. *I* can't fix it. *You* can't fix it. But if all the participants were seriously motivated and committed to reviving rec.boats to it's former glory, it can be done by simply resisting the urge to post idiotic claims/counterclaims. It can't be "my" rules .... "your" rules or anybody else's "rules". Eisboch Well, then, I go back to my original post on this to you...that as a boating newsgroup, this place is lost, and that I show up mainly to watch the aberrant behavior of the seven dwarfs and (as you mentioned) to crap on one of their heads from time to time. None of the seven, so far as I can tell, has the slightest interest in boating related subjects or, if they do, they seem incapable of making any but the most empty headed of posts (e.g., I took my kid wakeboarding yesterday, or, I took my 93 grandchildren on a cruise). So... Harry, your statement, "I show up mainly to watch aberrant behavior...", is belied by the sheer quantity of attack posts you make here. I am willing to make you a deal. I will make no posts on Chuck's Island if you make no more than one more post here, in answer to this one. Look what you'd have to gain! WAFA can't, John. He has a mental disease that controls his behavior. He's done it. Now, what are you gaining by the posts you've made in the past hour? As I thought, you were wrong (or scammed). WAFA can spin any topic to his benefit. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Nice pics at Chuck's | General | |||
| Chuck's Boston Trip | General | |||
| Chuck's boat reno | General | |||
| Chuck's hero loses. | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
