HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 13, 5:03 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:47:01 -0500, John H. wrote:
You might want to consider, Republicans' were rather slow to come
around
to the threat. As I recall, a BJ had all their focus. Remember "Wag
the Dog"?
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...esstional.reac...

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/25/wag-the-dog/
So you believe that Clinton was actually trying to do something other
than divert attention?
Why didn't he finish the job?
Why hasn't GWB? bin Laden is *still* missing.

yukity, yukity, yuk, that's sooooo 2003...Get with it, the mission
changes, like any war...


Translation: Bush blew it, but we don't want to discuss that part of it
anymore.

Blew what? There is no benefit in "getting Bin Laden." If we kill him on
the battle field he becomes a martyr, if we capture and then kill him,
regardless of the circumstances, we become very bad people, however, if
we let him die in a cold dark cave in the mountainous region between
Afghanistan and Pakistan he dies as a feeble man. The latter is the
preferred method for Bin Laden to die.