wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:36:38 -0400, Eisboch wrote:


Some would argue that is because Clinton didn't do much, period.

US interests were attacked many times by terrorists during the Clinton
years with very little action or response on his part.

Eisboch

You might want to consider, Republicans' were rather slow to come around
to the threat. As I recall, a BJ had all their focus. Remember "Wag the
Dog"?

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stori...onal.react.02/

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/25/wag-the-dog/


They were focusing on the BJ because it was heterosexual. The Repubs
weren't aware of *that* possibility. :)