wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is
the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe
that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the
business of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his
fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but
not for the sex.

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is
the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe
that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the business
of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his
fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but
not for the sex.

Well, she's one lucky woman that the great Harry Krause hasn't cheated on
her yet. Perhaps he hasn't had the opportunity.

wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is
the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe
that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the
business
of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his
fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but
not for the sex.

Well, she's one lucky woman that the great Harry Krause hasn't cheated on
her yet. Perhaps he hasn't had the opportunity.


Once again, you are projecting.

wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is
the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe
that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the
business
of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his
fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but
not for the sex.

Well, she's one lucky woman that the great Harry Krause hasn't cheated on
her yet. Perhaps he hasn't had the opportunity.

Or the means.

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:06:40 -0400, BAR wrote:

wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is
the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe
that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the
business
of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his
fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but
not for the sex.

Well, she's one lucky woman that the great Harry Krause hasn't cheated on
her yet. Perhaps he hasn't had the opportunity.

Or the means.

Harry is the type who is also unconcerned about the fact that half of the
black females from 14-19 have an STD, or that 25% of all 14-19 year-old
females have an STD.

It's a liberal thing.
--
John

wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is
the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe
that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the
business
of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his
fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but
not for the sex.

Well, she's one lucky woman that the great Harry Krause hasn't cheated on
her yet. Perhaps he hasn't had the opportunity.

Or the means.

HK wrote:
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults
is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe
that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the
business of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his
fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but
not for the sex.

I think prostitution and drugs should be decriminalized, but i would
never recommend we just ignore those crimes we don't agree with. I
guess that is one of the things you and will just disagree.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults
is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't
believe that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be
the business of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for
his fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for
that, but not for the sex.

I think prostitution and drugs should be decriminalized, but i would
never recommend we just ignore those crimes we don't agree with. I
guess that is one of the things you and will just disagree.


If prostitution is decriminalized, well, then, it isn't a crime, is it?

Stupid laws should be fought. If we followed your example, we'd still
have segregation.

HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults
is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the
relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't
believe that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be
the business of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for
his fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for
that, but not for the sex.

I think prostitution and drugs should be decriminalized, but i would
never recommend we just ignore those crimes we don't agree with. I
guess that is one of the things you and will just disagree.


If prostitution is decriminalized, well, then, it isn't a crime, is it?

Stupid laws should be fought. If we followed your example, we'd still
have segregation.

We have an established way to change those laws you call stupid. It is
called the legislative process. You are free to encourage your Democrat
brothers and sisters to offer a bill decriminalizing prostitution. Or,
you can go and have a state or municipality enact a law decriminalizing
prostitution.

I am suprised the party of low morales and no ethics, the Democrat
party, hasn't gotten this accomplished yet.

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
...
I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting
adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in
the relationship.

Try that line on your wife and see how it flies.


We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't
believe that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should
be the business of the law, or even the general public.

I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he
sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for
his fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for
that, but not for the sex.

I think prostitution and drugs should be decriminalized, but i would
never recommend we just ignore those crimes we don't agree with. I
guess that is one of the things you and will just disagree.


If prostitution is decriminalized, well, then, it isn't a crime, is it?

Stupid laws should be fought. If we followed your example, we'd still
have segregation.

We have an established way to change those laws you call stupid. It is
called the legislative process. You are free to encourage your Democrat
brothers and sisters to offer a bill decriminalizing prostitution. Or,
you can go and have a state or municipality enact a law decriminalizing
prostitution.

I am suprised the party of low morales and no ethics, the Democrat
party, hasn't gotten this accomplished yet.

There is *nothing* a prostitute does that compares in depravity to what
Bush and Cheney have perpetrated on this country and the world.