Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message . .. HK wrote: D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: HK wrote: Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H. wrote: why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a Democrat, although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a Republican is involved in a sex scandal. It couldn't be media bias, could it? http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms The undereducated must never know the truth, else the Democrats may lose their base. Got a better one for you. Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what political affiliation the mayor of Detroit is. Oh - the reason? He's involved with the murder a hooker. And covering/obstructing the investigation. Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by political party because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of "family values," and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out the various sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans. My favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays. One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the Democrat party has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct. Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above the bar aren't a great party, that's the Democrats. I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the relationship. I don't take seriously any of "morality" crap as exuded by "family value" conservatives/Republicans. It's all the height of hypocrisy. .Hypocrisy you say. Spitzer is the poster boy for that trait. Indeed he is. But that isn't illegal, usually. But paying for a hooker and financially supporting an illegal business is. Not illegal everywhere, and that's why most cops are smart enough to not obsess about it. If a law enforcement agency puts a lot of attention into it on occasion, it's almost always for some other reason. Everyone knows that. Goodbye. |
#72
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message
. .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message . .. HK wrote: D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: HK wrote: Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H. wrote: why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a Democrat, although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a Republican is involved in a sex scandal. It couldn't be media bias, could it? http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms The undereducated must never know the truth, else the Democrats may lose their base. Got a better one for you. Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what political affiliation the mayor of Detroit is. Oh - the reason? He's involved with the murder a hooker. And covering/obstructing the investigation. Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by political party because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of "family values," and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out the various sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans. My favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays. One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the Democrat party has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct. Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above the bar aren't a great party, that's the Democrats. I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the relationship. I don't take seriously any of "morality" crap as exuded by "family value" conservatives/Republicans. It's all the height of hypocrisy. .Hypocrisy you say. Spitzer is the poster boy for that trait. Indeed he is. But that isn't illegal, usually. But paying for a hooker and financially supporting an illegal business is. Not illegal everywhere, and that's why most cops are smart enough to not obsess about it. If a law enforcement agency puts a lot of attention into it on occasion, it's almost always for some other reason. Everyone knows that. Goodbye. Why? It's true. Ask any cop, especially in a big city where there are much scarier things they need to deal with. They may round up hookers & johns if they're becoming an annoyance and there are complaints from businesses & residents. But, generally, they leave them alone. What kind of fairy tale world do you live in? |
#73
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message . .. JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message . .. HK wrote: D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: HK wrote: Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H. wrote: why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a Democrat, although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a Republican is involved in a sex scandal. It couldn't be media bias, could it? http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms The undereducated must never know the truth, else the Democrats may lose their base. Got a better one for you. Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what political affiliation the mayor of Detroit is. Oh - the reason? He's involved with the murder a hooker. And covering/obstructing the investigation. Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by political party because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of "family values," and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out the various sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans. My favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays. One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the Democrat party has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct. Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above the bar aren't a great party, that's the Democrats. I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the relationship. I don't take seriously any of "morality" crap as exuded by "family value" conservatives/Republicans. It's all the height of hypocrisy. .Hypocrisy you say. Spitzer is the poster boy for that trait. Indeed he is. But that isn't illegal, usually. But paying for a hooker and financially supporting an illegal business is. Not illegal everywhere, and that's why most cops are smart enough to not obsess about it. If a law enforcement agency puts a lot of attention into it on occasion, it's almost always for some other reason. Everyone knows that. Goodbye. Why? It's true. Ask any cop, especially in a big city where there are much scarier things they need to deal with. They may round up hookers & johns if they're becoming an annoyance and there are complaints from businesses & residents. But, generally, they leave them alone. What kind of fairy tale world do you live in? ReggieVille? |
#74
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Q. Public" wrote in message
... In message news ![]() why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a Democrat, although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a Republican is involved in a sex scandal. Our paper's headline: GOP calls on Spitzer to resign It uses those words because they accurately describe who is calling on him to resign. No mention of scandal. No mention of whores. Today's headline? If yes, there's no mention of those things because you'd have to be living in a cave to have missed the rest of the story. No mention of Democrats. Rewrite the story. Pretend you majored in journalism. |
#75
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hk" wrote in message . .. wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... Consensual - you know - both parties agree. They consent. The standard definition. What do you think consensual means? :) I think I'll reconsider our personal value system and encourage our kids that: Extramarital sex is fun and ok ..... as long as it is consensual. Forget the vows and commitments you made to each other. Drugs are fun and ok ..... as long as everyone in the family agrees. Introduce your 12 year old to the pleasures. Lying and cheating is ok .... as long as it only serves your personal agenda. In other words, become a Democrat. Eisboch This behavior seems normal if you are a swinger like Harry. This guy really gives me the creeps. Are you projecting again? Why would you think I was a "swinger," because I am not upset by adult expressions of sexuality? No, that's not it. I don't think you can tell the difference between right and wrong. Ahh, well. That's your problem, not mine. Wrong again. It was probably back in the sixties when the oil leaked out of your moral compass. It's been spinning out of control ever since. The difference between you and many other people that had that problem back then is that most of em got their compass fixed and you didn't. And that's your problem. You are quite the funny guy. It's always amusing when right wingers make moral pronouncements about others. Oh. I've got some stuff for you that will keep you in stitches. But for now I am awarding you a time out. Buh Bye. snerk |
#76
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
You are quite the funny guy. It's always amusing when right wingers make moral pronouncements about others. Oh. I've got some stuff for you that will keep you in stitches. But for now I am awarding you a time out. Buh Bye. snerk Stitches? You threatening me? |
#77
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 12, 10:40*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message ... HK wrote: D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: HK wrote: Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H. wrote: why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a Democrat, although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a Republican is involved in a sex scandal. It couldn't be media bias, could it? http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms The undereducated must never know the truth, else the Democrats may lose their base. Got a better one for you. Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what political affiliation the mayor of Detroit is. Oh - the reason? He's involved with the murder a hooker. And covering/obstructing the investigation. Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by political party because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of "family values," and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out the various sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans. My favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays. One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the Democrat party has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct. Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above the bar aren't a great party, that's the Democrats. I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the relationship. I don't take seriously any of "morality" crap as exuded by "family value" conservatives/Republicans. It's all the height of hypocrisy. .Hypocrisy you say. *Spitzer is the poster boy for that trait. Indeed he is. But that isn't illegal, usually. But paying for a hooker and financially supporting an illegal business is. Not illegal everywhere, and that's why most cops are smart enough to not obsess about it. If a law enforcement agency puts a lot of attention into it on occasion, it's almost always for some other reason. Everyone knows that. Goodbye.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I generally don't infringe on SW's territory, but I have to say ~~snerk~~ Cause that just says it best. ![]() |
#78
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Mar 12, 10:40 am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message ... HK wrote: D.Duck wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... BAR wrote: HK wrote: Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H. wrote: why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a Democrat, although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a Republican is involved in a sex scandal. It couldn't be media bias, could it? http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms The undereducated must never know the truth, else the Democrats may lose their base. Got a better one for you. Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what political affiliation the mayor of Detroit is. Oh - the reason? He's involved with the murder a hooker. And covering/obstructing the investigation. Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by political party because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of "family values," and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out the various sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans. My favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays. One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the Democrat party has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct. Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above the bar aren't a great party, that's the Democrats. I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the relationship. I don't take seriously any of "morality" crap as exuded by "family value" conservatives/Republicans. It's all the height of hypocrisy. .Hypocrisy you say. Spitzer is the poster boy for that trait. Indeed he is. But that isn't illegal, usually. But paying for a hooker and financially supporting an illegal business is. Not illegal everywhere, and that's why most cops are smart enough to not obsess about it. If a law enforcement agency puts a lot of attention into it on occasion, it's almost always for some other reason. Everyone knows that. Goodbye.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I generally don't infringe on SW's territory, but I have to say ~~snerk~~ Cause that just says it best. ![]() ============================ Reggie is allergic to facts. |
#79
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John H." wrote in message
... On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:33 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "BAR" wrote in message m... HK wrote: Valgard Toebreakerson wrote: On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:40:23 -0500, John H. wrote: why most of the major media refuse to mention that Spitzer is a Democrat, although the party affiliation is mentioned ad nauseum when a Republican is involved in a sex scandal. It couldn't be media bias, could it? http://tinyurl.com/2c3kms The undereducated must never know the truth, else the Democrats may lose their base. Got a better one for you. Go to Detroit news - paper, TV - whatever, and find what political affiliation the mayor of Detroit is. Oh - the reason? He's involved with the murder a hooker. And covering/obstructing the investigation. Republicans involved in these scandals are identified by political party because the GOP likes to identify itself as the party of "family values," and since it obviously is not, it is interesting to point out the various sexual adventures of "family value" conservatives/Republicans. My favorite exposes involve conservative/Republicans and gays. One can only conclude, by your statments above, that the Democrat party has no values, none, nada, zip. Is that correct. Throw the bar on the floor, then everything we do will be above the bar aren't a great party, that's the Democrats. Democrats are less likely to suggest that people live like families which only exist in books written for toddlers. From what I've seen, you could put your period after the word 'families' in your sentence above. -- John That's because you're lying. Or, because you don't see much. Don't fret about it. It's a plague. |
#80
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:06:40 -0400, BAR wrote:
wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... I don't believe that sexual relationships between consenting adults is the business of anyone other than the adults involved in the relationship. Try that line on your wife and see how it flies. We agree. We're loyal to each other because we are, but we don't believe that matters of sexuality between consenting adults should be the business of the law, or even the general public. I don't give a damn who Governor Spitzer sleeps with, not even if he sleeps with hookers, so long as he is using his own money to pay for his fun. If he was using public funds, he should be prosecuted for that, but not for the sex. Well, she's one lucky woman that the great Harry Krause hasn't cheated on her yet. Perhaps he hasn't had the opportunity. Or the means. Harry is the type who is also unconcerned about the fact that half of the black females from 14-19 have an STD, or that 25% of all 14-19 year-old females have an STD. It's a liberal thing. -- John |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|