Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:

Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's
ass.


Tough soldier talk! snerk

Herring, of course, is the newsgroup expert on soldier ass.


I'm betting he's seen his share!



Don, have you ever had a heterosexual thought?

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:35:57 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"BAR" wrote in message
m...
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
news Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK
wrote:

BAR wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
...
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was
unaware of
predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months,
told
reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend
off
high
prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts
permanent.

...

Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by
this
spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation,
among
other reasons.

When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told
the
reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."*
Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on
fears of
renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in
a
country from which we get pretty much zero oil?

Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is
perceived as
a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the
cause?
Political blame for US election advantage.

The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next
President
is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush?


The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the
IDIOT
heads
back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video
games,
booze, coke, and drunken driving.

Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems
will
run. Got it?
Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her?

You're still past tense.
--
John H

Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny?
Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would
just
about do it.
Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again?

Speaking of idiots...........
I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating
my food and drinking my beer.


Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common.
The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals
here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is
acceptable
to you?

Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying
rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need
to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to
do
so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled.



Is this Blurt, the pseudo Christian or Blurt, the pseudo marine talkin'?


Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's
ass.

Be your own man, Don. Harry doesn't need your hand-licking, tail-wagging,
puppy dogging.
--
John H

On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:37:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:35:57 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"BAR" wrote in message
om...
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
news Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK
wrote:

BAR wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
...
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was
unaware of
predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months,
told
reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend
off
high
prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts
permanent.

...

Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by
this
spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation,
among
other reasons.

When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told
the
reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."*
Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on
fears of
renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in
a
country from which we get pretty much zero oil?

Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is
perceived as
a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the
cause?
Political blame for US election advantage.

The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next
President
is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush?


The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the
IDIOT
heads
back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video
games,
booze, coke, and drunken driving.

Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems
will
run. Got it?
Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her?

You're still past tense.
--
John H

Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny?
Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would
just
about do it.
Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again?

Speaking of idiots...........
I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating
my food and drinking my beer.


Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common.
The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals
here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is
acceptable
to you?

Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying
rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need
to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to
do
so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled.



Is this Blurt, the pseudo Christian or Blurt, the pseudo marine talkin'?


Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's
ass.

Be your own man, Don. Harry doesn't need your hand-licking, tail-wagging,
puppy dogging.
--
John H


The connection between Harry and anyone else is largely imaginary. He just
jumps in the "help" whether anyone needs it or not. But, you're the same
way. When you live in a glass house, don't throw stones.


Imaginary my ass.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 11:57:46 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 10:35:57 -0400, "Don White"
wrote:


"BAR" wrote in message
om...
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
news Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Don White wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:23:44 -0500, HK
wrote:

BAR wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
...
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was
unaware of
predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months,
told
reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend
off
high
prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts
permanent.

...

Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by
this
spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation,
among
other reasons.

When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told
the
reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."*
Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on
fears of
renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in
a
country from which we get pretty much zero oil?

Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is
perceived as
a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the
cause?
Political blame for US election advantage.

The sad thing is that Bush leaves office as soon as the next
President
is sworn in on 1/20/09. Why is everyone running against Bush?


The sad thing? There will be dancing in the streets when the
IDIOT
heads
back to Crawford, or wherever he plans to go to take up his video
games,
booze, coke, and drunken driving.

Oh...it is the *failed* Bush-GOP policies against which the Dems
will
run. Got it?
Harry, does your mother know you're telling lies about her?

You're still past tense.
--
John H

Back to bringing families into the foolishness here eh Johnny?
Time for an extended Goofy cruise..... from now until May would
just
about do it.
Did you lazy son drink all of your beer again?

Speaking of idiots...........
I don't have a lazy son laying around my house, watching my TV, eating
my food and drinking my beer.


Well.. believe it or not, looks like we have something in common.
The only thing my son does on your list is .. he eats most of his meals
here...... but since he pays 'room & board', I assume this is
acceptable
to you?

Any child over the age of 25 still living at home regardless of paying
rent or room and board should be pushed out the door. Your children need
to find their own way in life and they should be strongly encouraged to
do
so. There are exceptions for physically or mentally disabled.



Is this Blurt, the pseudo Christian or Blurt, the pseudo marine talkin'?


Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's
ass.

Be your own man, Don. Harry doesn't need your hand-licking, tail-wagging,
puppy dogging.
--
John H




That's the best thought you've had in months.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Tim" wrote in message news:e75e8ad5-ff31-4c80-8517-

The gov. still says we're broke.

yeah.... r-r-r-r-ight!

Government spending will always grow to exceed revenues unless you get a
real conservative player at the top willing to rustle the feathers of the
civil service. That is, put the government on a diet and show some real
leadership.

"BAR" wrote in message
news
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:

Smart assed question from one who wouldn't make a pimple on a Marine's
ass.


Tough soldier talk! snerk

Herring, of course, is the newsgroup expert on soldier ass.


I'm betting he's seen his share!

Don, have you ever had a heterosexual thought?


You should really try thinking a bit before blurting things out........ then
again, maybe you do...which is even scarier!

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

He's in a halfway house, hopefully on his way to a "fullway" house. :)


I wouldn't hold my breath...those %^%& politicians are slippery *******s.
We would love to nail a former prime minister ( Ronnie Reagan bum boy) up
here, but with his Conservative party currently in power....... he shucks
& jives with the best of them.
Have you stopped and taken a look at why the Conservative party is in
power? You can bitch about all you want but, a majority of your fellow
citizens disagree with you.

Out choices were limited. Liberals just finished with a significant
corruption scandal. Now the conservatives too are up to it. There are
problems in only having one active branch of government, something the
forefounders of the US got real right. Must more aristocratic than the US.
The Canadian government is in essence a 5 year dictatorship if it is not in
a minority government situation.

The Canadian senate for example, appointed by the ruling party is a
geriatric yes fest. Not once in Canadian history has the Canadian senate
actually blocked a piece of legislation from eventually becoming law.
Totally ineffective and a waste of money. British parliamentary
hand-me-down with all the warts.

There is no congress. And our bill of rights is secular. I always admired
"We the people..." -- freaking insightful of the US founders. Ours was
drawn up by a drunken aristocrat.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:50:39 GMT, "Canuck57"
wrote:


"JimH" wrote in message
. ..

"Canuck57" wrote in message
news:4Jmyj.31064$w94.3216@pd7urf2no...

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 14:32:58 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Everyone says 4 dollars... I will throw my prediction in, I think we
will test 5 dollars a gallon before the end of the year.

I'll take that bet. I'll say that gas will be back at $2.34/gal by
the end of the year.

And oil will be down around $60/bl.

What do you base that on?

Fantasy what?

If I knew you, I would gave you 3:1 odds against and an $10,000 wager
you
are wrong.


I would up the odds to 4::1 on $100,000.

There is no way oil will drop to $60/barrel and gasoline drop to $2.34
by
the end of 2008, Presidential election year or not.

This series of posts is a keeper. ;-)

Hey, I was trying to make money on an almost assured bet, you undercut
me....

Will do 5:1?

We'll see who is right. :)

And make that Canadian dollars or Euros.

Canuck57 wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
He's in a halfway house, hopefully on his way to a "fullway" house. :)

I wouldn't hold my breath...those %^%& politicians are slippery *******s.
We would love to nail a former prime minister ( Ronnie Reagan bum boy) up
here, but with his Conservative party currently in power....... he shucks
& jives with the best of them.
Have you stopped and taken a look at why the Conservative party is in
power? You can bitch about all you want but, a majority of your fellow
citizens disagree with you.

Out choices were limited. Liberals just finished with a significant
corruption scandal. Now the conservatives too are up to it. There are
problems in only having one active branch of government, something the
forefounders of the US got real right. Must more aristocratic than the US.
The Canadian government is in essence a 5 year dictatorship if it is not in
a minority government situation.

The Canadian senate for example, appointed by the ruling party is a
geriatric yes fest. Not once in Canadian history has the Canadian senate
actually blocked a piece of legislation from eventually becoming law.
Totally ineffective and a waste of money. British parliamentary
hand-me-down with all the warts.

There is no congress. And our bill of rights is secular. I always admired
"We the people..." -- freaking insightful of the US founders. Ours was
drawn up by a drunken aristocrat.

Y'all should have joined with us in our efforts to kick the British out
of the north American continent, way back in the late 18th century.

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:01:04 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote:

2) I don't mind ****ing off the Kennedy's, but geographically I hope
it is not cutting off one's nose to spite one's face (the studies say,
not). Wind is a good way to go, though, and I suspect that the project
will be approved this year and we may see a turbine in place in about
4 years....

http://www.reuters.com/article/domes...rpc=22&sp=true


Not that I particularly care or am even concerned, but it sure won't
surprise me to read a future report by an AGore wannabe that widespread
use of wind power has detrimental effects on the earth's natural air
currents, seed distribution and overall global tinkering with nature.

Nuclear power is the answer. Clean, safe and has been the center of our
solar system and of the universe for that matter, for billions of years.

Eisboch

Only a few problems with nuclear. But I agree, currently our best option.

First, it needs to be safer to run. And not just the uranium cycle, but the
thorium cycle is pretty good characteristics here and the US even has
thorium reserves. The issue is 3-mile island type issues. Needs a massive
KISS redesign for dummies to get it right every time.

Second issue, as hot water/steam is involved, the greenies will still
complain. 1/2 the greenies out there are stupid sheep following a pied
piper -- Green has more to do with marketing and crowd control than reality.
But none the less, greens will pounce on every nuke for something to do.

Now to store the stuff for mobility, add lead, mercury, lithium and other
heavy metals that are usually considered toxic. Have to buy one whole lot
of batteries to pull a boat.