Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Solar, although getting better, is still less efficient than wind. Eisboch Solar is oversold. 2 huge problems. Does not work well if you have a cloudy week and at nights. Then you have to store the power to use it. And that is before one gets to needing many acres of land to get a meaningful quality. And by the way, using lots of plastics made from oil to make the cells...funny. Works good on poles and signs though. Just isn't going to scale up or power a whole city. |
#132
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BAR" wrote in message news ![]() Canuck57 wrote: "BAR" wrote in message . .. Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... He's in a halfway house, hopefully on his way to a "fullway" house. :) I wouldn't hold my breath...those %^%& politicians are slippery *******s. We would love to nail a former prime minister ( Ronnie Reagan bum boy) up here, but with his Conservative party currently in power....... he shucks & jives with the best of them. Have you stopped and taken a look at why the Conservative party is in power? You can bitch about all you want but, a majority of your fellow citizens disagree with you. Out choices were limited. Liberals just finished with a significant corruption scandal. Now the conservatives too are up to it. There are problems in only having one active branch of government, something the forefounders of the US got real right. Must more aristocratic than the US. The Canadian government is in essence a 5 year dictatorship if it is not in a minority government situation. The Canadian senate for example, appointed by the ruling party is a geriatric yes fest. Not once in Canadian history has the Canadian senate actually blocked a piece of legislation from eventually becoming law. Totally ineffective and a waste of money. British parliamentary hand-me-down with all the warts. There is no congress. And our bill of rights is secular. I always admired "We the people..." -- freaking insightful of the US founders. Ours was drawn up by a drunken aristocrat. Y'all should have joined with us in our efforts to kick the British out of the north American continent, way back in the late 18th century. No doubt in my mind. Not just the British though, don't forget France's influence (Quebec). |
#133
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Canuck57" wrote in message news:J7Byj.36101$w94.20623@pd7urf2no... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... Solar, although getting better, is still less efficient than wind. Eisboch Solar is oversold. 2 huge problems. Does not work well if you have a cloudy week and at nights. Then you have to store the power to use it. And that is before one gets to needing many acres of land to get a meaningful quality. And by the way, using lots of plastics made from oil to make the cells...funny. Plastic? Don't think so. State of the art cells are doped silicon (plenty of that around) which are then further processed with protective and conductive coatings. Recent advances in the optical assemblies that focus more of the available sunlight onto the cells is one of the significant reasons for improved efficiency. About 25 years ago solar cell efficiency was, at best, 15 percent. Today it's up to a mind boggling 18-20 percent. Long ways to go. Solar and wind are still a long, long ways from being a viable energy alternative to replace fossil fuel. The 100,000 megawatt capacity of the nuclear plants currently operating in the US only supplies about 20 percent of consummed power. Solar and/or wind can't even be considered to make up the difference, let alone replace oil and nuc altogether. Eisboch |
#134
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 21:48:00 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:25:28 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: I don't know about that. There's nothing on the horizon to influence it that way. I'd like to hear your reasoning. It's pretty simple - it's a huge commodity bubble. There is absoutely nothing, and I mean nothing, to support these levels in any sense of the word. It's too much money chasing too little profit - a sort of currency inflation if you will. If I'm right, and I'm pretty sure I am, economic data will provide the catalyst for the crash - sometime around the middle to the end of July. Hmmmmm..... It sounds like you are basically in agreement with Doug. Did hell just freeze over? Well, obviously - six inches of snow last night and no open water anywhere. :) I'd add this - out of control information flow is also a function of this - anything will move the market. If somebody sneezes in Nigeria, another $.50 to $1. Fog in the Houston shipping channel - another $.50 to a $1. And it happens more and more often - issues that wouldn't have affected the price 10 years ago, now can cause 1-2% changes in price instantly. Bingo. And, it works in the exact same way as when irrelevant financial news causes nervous old ladies to sell their Toyota stock because Kroger reported a bad quarter. And we can blame the whole mess on some tulip lovers. |
#135
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:07:50 -0500, Eisboch wrote:
Solar and wind are still a long, long ways from being a viable energy alternative to replace fossil fuel. The 100,000 megawatt capacity of the nuclear plants currently operating in the US only supplies about 20 percent of consummed power. Solar and/or wind can't even be considered to make up the difference, let alone replace oil and nuc altogether. I'm not sure about that. In this country, wind energy alone, accounts for 13,000 megawatts, most installed in the last 5 years, and there are estimates that wind alone, could provide twice our present energy needs. Portugal expects 45% of their energy needs to be met by renewable energy by 2015. Germany isn't far behind. I don't think anyone expects *one* silver bullet. It's going to take conservation, new technologies, and, perhaps, most importantly, a comprehensive national energy policy, which this present administration doesn't seem to have the stomach for. I'm not saying it will be easy, but it can be done, and solar/wind should be part of the mix. |
#136
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Mar 1, 6:33 pm, "Don White" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:vhmjs3hb88pe2briqesvncdfgof6b1n6cq@4ax .com... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:01:04 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: 2) I don't mind ****ing off the Kennedy's, but geographically I hope it is not cutting off one's nose to spite one's face (the studies say, not). Wind is a good way to go, though, and I suspect that the project will be approved this year and we may see a turbine in place in about 4 years.... http://www.reuters.com/article/domes...2920080228?fee... Careful what you wish for. Quite a few of those big wind towers have been errected here and people close to the wind farms complain that the noise makes them sick.http://www.ventdecolere.org/archives...y/nswind_e.htm LOL.. ================ It figures you'd say "LOL" because you're completely at a loss to understand the information presented. Isn't it time for the captain's nightly licking, puppy boy? |
#137
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gene Kearns wrote: .. Gimme a brake..... I'm getting over the flue, it is a wonder I am even coherent.... -- Sorry to hear you've been sick, Gene. hope you get feeling better quickly. |
#138
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 2, 7:04*pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Mar 1, 6:33 pm, "Don White" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:vhmjs3hb88pe2briqesvncdfgof6b1n6cq@4ax .com... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:01:04 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: 2) I don't mind ****ing off the Kennedy's, but geographically I hope it is not cutting off one's nose to spite one's face (the studies say, not). Wind is a good way to go, though, and I suspect that the project will be approved this year and we may see a turbine in place in about 4 years.... http://www.reuters.com/article/domes...2920080228?fee.... Careful what you wish for. Quite a few of those big wind towers have been errected here and people close to the wind farms complain that the noise makes them sick.http://www.ventdecolere.org/archives...&low_frequency... LOL.. ================ It figures you'd say "LOL" because you're completely at a loss to understand the information presented. Isn't it time for the captain's nightly licking, puppy boy?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You know the deal. Come here, sign a release, get in the ring, let me videotape myself breaking your elbow over my leg... then you will have my respect... Until then... well, you know.... |
#139
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Mar 2, 7:04 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: wrote in message ... On Mar 1, 6:33 pm, "Don White" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in messagenews:vhmjs3hb88pe2briqesvncdfgof6b1n6cq@4ax .com... On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 15:01:04 -0500, Gene Kearns wrote: 2) I don't mind ****ing off the Kennedy's, but geographically I hope it is not cutting off one's nose to spite one's face (the studies say, not). Wind is a good way to go, though, and I suspect that the project will be approved this year and we may see a turbine in place in about 4 years.... http://www.reuters.com/article/domes...2920080228?fee... Careful what you wish for. Quite a few of those big wind towers have been errected here and people close to the wind farms complain that the noise makes them sick.http://www.ventdecolere.org/archives...&low_frequency... LOL.. ================ It figures you'd say "LOL" because you're completely at a loss to understand the information presented. Isn't it time for the captain's nightly licking, puppy boy?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You know the deal. Come here, sign a release, get in the ring, let me videotape myself breaking your elbow over my leg... then you will have my respect... Until then... well, you know.... ======================== Well, that certainly clarifies your knowledge of the wind farm issue. |
#140
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim" wrote in message ... Gene Kearns wrote: . Gimme a brake..... I'm getting over the flue, it is a wonder I am even coherent.... -- Sorry to hear you've been sick, Gene. hope you get feeling better quickly. Ditto. This year's flu bug seems to be almost epidemic. From what Mrs.E. tells me, most of our family are sick, half the company's employee's are sick, several of her friends at the horse joint are sick and the schools are half filled with kids who have either recovered or haven't been sick yet. I wouldn't know first hand. I've holed myself up in a corner of the house with enough food, water and dog bones for Sam Adams to last until the GB is launched. No way am I going out "there" in a community filled with diseases. Eisboch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Our next president | General | |||
I am the President! | ASA | |||
( OT) Help your president | General | |||
( OT ) Do we have a gay president? | General |